How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A -invariant section is determined on the big cell
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let and let , regarded as a regular function on with . If is invariant under left translation by (equivalently, if for every in the negative nilradical ), then Consequently is determined by its value , the space of left--invariant sections of has dimension at most , and every nonzero such section spans the -weight space of weight , that is for all .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the group , its Borel and opposite unipotent subgroup , the flag variety , a weight , the bundle , and as in the Statement.
Restriction along identifies with the regular functions on satisfying , and the induced -action is left translation (Sections of an associated line bundle as equivariant functions, The equivariant line bundle associated to a Borel character).
The multiplication map , , is an isomorphism onto a dense open subscheme of (The opposite-root big cell is an open chart).
and is the product of the root subgroups , , each being a closed one-parameter subgroup isomorphic to ; the torus normalizes each , with (Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates, Algebraic root subgroups from root exponentials).
For every nonzero the curve is the isomorphism onto the closed subgroup , and it is given by polynomial matrix coefficients; hence and for the function is polynomial in for every regular and every (Algebraic root subgroups from root exponentials, Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates).
Proof
Fix a root parametrization with . The derived left action is . If every annihilates , put . For every , the group law gives . Thus this polynomial has zero derivative everywhere and is constant over . Each root subgroup fixes , and their product is by [F3], so fixes . Conversely, differentiating a -invariant function gives .
Assume now that is invariant under . For and the invariance gives , and the functional equation of [F1] with gives . Hence for all , .
Let be two -invariant sections of with . By step 2.1, and agree on , which is dense open in the irreducible variety by [F2]; two regular functions on agreeing on a dense open subset agree everywhere, so . The linear map is therefore injective on the space of -invariant sections, which has dimension at most .
Finally let and put . By [F3] the torus normalizes every , so is again -invariant: for there is with . Hence is a -invariant section, and by the functional equation. By step 3.1 the vanishing of forces , that is . If is nonzero, it therefore has weight .
Let be any section of -weight . Left translation and right -equivariance [F1] give for . In the polynomial root coordinates on of [F3], conjugation scales each coordinate by the character for a positive root . A nonconstant monomial has character : every positive root has nonnegative simple-root coefficients, and some . Since distinct torus characters are linearly independent (restrict a finite list to a one-parameter subgroup separating their exponents), a conjugation-invariant polynomial is constant. Thus is constant on and on . Density [F2] makes -invariant on . Step 3.1 now shows that the entire weight- space has dimension at most one; any nonzero invariant section spans it.
Remarks
Constancy in step 1.1 uses vanishing of the derived action at every translated point, giving zero derivative at every parameter value, rather than only at the origin.
Depends on
- Sections of an associated line bundle as equivariant functions
- The cohomology of a Borel-character line bundle is a rational G-module
- The opposite-root big cell is an open chart
- Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates
- Algebraic root subgroups from root exponentials
- Complex semisimple algebraic group, Borel, and flag variety
- The equivariant line bundle associated to a Borel character
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- The Borel-Weil theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jacob Lurie, A Proof of the Borel-Weil-Bott Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- Xiong Rui, Borel-Weil and Borel-Weil-Bott, Lecture 1 (standard reference, not scraped)