Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A U−-invariant section is determined on the big cell

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let λ∈X∗(T) and let f∈H0(X,Lλ), regarded as a regular function on G with f(gb)=λ(b)f(g). If f is invariant under left translation by U− (equivalently, if x⋅f=0 for every x in the negative nilradical n−), then f(u−b)=λ(b)f(1)(u−∈U−, b∈B). Consequently f is determined by its value f(1), the space of left-U−-invariant sections of Lλ has dimension at most 1, and every nonzero such section spans the T-weight space of weight −λ, that is t⋅f=λ(t)−1f for all t∈T.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the group G, its Borel B=T⋉U and opposite unipotent subgroup U−, the flag variety X=G/B, a weight λ, the bundle Lλ, and f∈H0(X,Lλ) as in the Statement.

[F1]

Restriction along G→X identifies H0(X,Lλ) with the regular functions on G satisfying f(gb)=λ(b)f(g), and the induced G-action is left translation (g0⋅f)(g)=f(g0−1g) (Sections of an associated line bundle as equivariant functions, The equivariant line bundle associated to a Borel character).

[F2]

The multiplication map U−×B→Ω=U−B, (u−,b)↦u−b, is an isomorphism onto a dense open subscheme Ω of G (The opposite-root big cell is an open chart).

[F3]

B=T⋉U and U− is the product of the root subgroups U−α, α∈Φ+, each U−α being a closed one-parameter subgroup isomorphic to Ga; the torus T normalizes each U−α, with t u−α(z) t−1=u−α((−α)(t)z) (Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates, Algebraic root subgroups from root exponentials).

[F4]

For every nonzero e∈g−α the curve z↦exp⁡G(ze) is the isomorphism u−α:Ga→U−α onto the closed subgroup U−α, and it is given by polynomial matrix coefficients; hence n−=Lie⁡U−=⨁α>0g−α and for x∈g−α the function z↦f(u−α(z)g) is polynomial in z for every regular f and every g (Algebraic root subgroups from root exponentials, Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates).

Proof

1.1F1F3F4givenalgebra

Fix a root parametrization u−α(t)=exp⁡G(tx) with 0≠x∈g−α. The derived left action is (x⋅f)(g)=ddt∣0f(u−α(−t)g). If every x∈n− annihilates f, put pg(t)=f(u−α(−t)g). For every t0, the group law gives pg′(t0)=(x⋅f)(u−α(−t0)g)=0. Thus this polynomial has zero derivative everywhere and is constant over C. Each root subgroup fixes f, and their product is U− by [F3], so U− fixes f. Conversely, differentiating a U−-invariant function gives n−f=0.

2.1F1step 1.1givenalgebra

Assume now that f is invariant under U−. For u−∈U− and b∈B the invariance gives f(u−b)=f(b), and the functional equation of [F1] with g=1 gives f(b)=f(1⋅b)=λ(b)f(1). Hence f(u−b)=λ(b)f(1) for all u−∈U−, b∈B.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra

Let f,f′ be two U−-invariant sections of Lλ with f(1)=f′(1). By step 2.1, f and f′ agree on Ω=U−B, which is dense open in the irreducible variety G by [F2]; two regular functions on G agreeing on a dense open subset agree everywhere, so f=f′. The linear map f↦f(1) is therefore injective on the space of U−-invariant sections, which has dimension at most 1.

4.1F1F3step 1.1step 3.1algebra

Finally let t∈T and put g=t⋅f−λ(t)−1f. By [F3] the torus normalizes every U−α, so t⋅f is again U−-invariant: for u−∈U− there is u′−=tu−t−1∈U− with u−⋅(t⋅f)=t⋅((t−1u−t)⋅f)=t⋅f. Hence g is a U−-invariant section, and g(1)=(t⋅f)(1)−λ(t)−1f(1)=f(t−1)−λ(t)−1f(1)=λ(t−1)f(1)−λ(t)−1f(1)=0 by the functional equation. By step 3.1 the vanishing of g(1) forces g=0, that is t⋅f=λ(t)−1f. If f is nonzero, it therefore has weight −λ.

5.1F1F2F3step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

Let h be any section of T-weight −λ. Left translation and right B-equivariance [F1] give h(tu−t−1)=h(u−) for t∈T. In the polynomial root coordinates on U− of [F3], conjugation scales each coordinate by the character −β for a positive root β. A nonconstant monomial has character −∑βmββ≠0: every positive root has nonnegative simple-root coefficients, and some mβ>0. Since distinct torus characters are linearly independent (restrict a finite list to a one-parameter subgroup separating their exponents), a conjugation-invariant polynomial is constant. Thus h is constant on U− and h(u−b)=λ(b)h(1) on Ω. Density [F2] makes h U−-invariant on G. Step 3.1 now shows that the entire weight-(−λ) space has dimension at most one; any nonzero invariant section spans it.

Remarks

Constancy in step 1.1 uses vanishing of the derived action at every translated point, giving zero derivative at every parameter value, rather than only at the origin.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources