How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every relation satisfies , and is a relation from to if and only if and
Statement
Let be a relation and let and be sets. Then
- (i) ;
- (ii) if and only if and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a relation and sets , .
A relation is a set every element of which is an ordered pair (Relation, , , , and the specialisations "relation from to " and "relation on ").
holds if and only if for some and some (The Cartesian product ).
if and only if and ( if and only if and ).
means that every element of is an element of (Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation ).
Proof
Claim (i): let . Since is a relation, for some sets and ; then and by the defining conditions, so .
Claim (ii), from left to right: assume . If then for some , so , so with and , and the characterising property gives . The argument for is the same on the second coordinate.
Claim (ii), from right to left: assume and , and let . Then with and , so .
Claims (i) and (ii) are established, which is the statement.
Depends on
- Relation, $\operatorname{dom} R$, $\operatorname{ran} R$, $\operatorname{fld} R$, and the specialisations "relation from $A$ to $B$" and "relation on $A$"
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
- Subset $x \subseteq y$, proper subset $x \subsetneq y$, and the separation notation $\{\, z \in x : \varphi(z) \,\}$
- $(a,b) = (c,d)$ if and only if $a = c$ and $b = d$
Used by
- For relations R and S and a set A, the collections { (b,a) : (a,b) ∈ R }, { (a,c) : ∃ b ((a,b) ∈ R ∧ (b,c) ∈ S) } and { (a,b) ∈ R : a ∈ A } are sets Lemma
- For sets A and B the collection of all functions A → B is a set, being a subset of P(A × B) Lemma
- T ∘ (S ∘ R) = (T ∘ S) ∘ R, (S ∘ R)⁻¹ = R⁻¹ ∘ S⁻¹, (R⁻¹)⁻¹ = R, dom(R⁻¹) = ran R, and Δ_B ∘ R = R = R ∘ Δ_A for a relation R from A to B Proposition
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 18 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Binary relation (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cartesian product (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)