How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A sparse -free graph has a large nearly covered sparse pair
Statement
Let with , and let be a -sparse -free graph with . Suppose that is not -sparse, and that there do not exist disjoint sets such that
and is -sparse to . Then there exist disjoint sets such that:
- and ;
- is -sparse to ; and
- every vertex of has at least neighbours in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Parameters and a graph satisfying the displayed hypotheses.
Claim 5.2.1 of the cited source proves exactly the displayed conclusion under these hypotheses after translating notation.
Proof
The cited source claim proves exactly this large nearly covered sparse-pair conclusion after translating notation.
Therefore the present statement follows.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. VII. The five-vertex path, Claim 5.2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)