Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A sparse graph without a large sparse pair has a large nearly covered sparse pair

Statement

Let x,y>0 with xy28, and let G be a y3-sparse graph with V(G)y4. Suppose that G is not 2y4-sparse, and that there do not exist disjoint sets X,YV(G) such that

Xy4V(G),Y(14y)V(G),

and Y is x-sparse to X. Then there exist a vertex vV(G) and disjoint sets A,BV(G){v} such that:

  1. AV(G)NG[v] and BNG(v);
  2. A(13y)V(G) and By4V(G);
  3. A is y2-sparse to B; and
  4. every vertex of B has at least x2A neighbours in A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Parameters x,y and a graph G satisfying the displayed hypotheses.

[L2]

The assertion that Y is x-sparse to X means that every vertex of Y has at most xX neighbours in X (Sparsity of one vertex set to another, and weak sparsity of a pair).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Because G is not 2y4-sparse, some vertex v has degree at least 2y4V(G). Let N:=NG(v). Then N2y4V(G).

givenchooseL1
2.1

Let A be the set of vertices in V(G)(N{v}) with at least 12y2N neighbours in N. Averaging over the edges between A and N, some vertex of N has at least 12y2A neighbours in A. Since every vertex has degree at most y3V(G) by [L1], we obtain 12y2Ay3V(G), so A2yV(G).

step 1.1L1choosealgebra
3.1

Define A:=V(G)(NA{v}). Since G is y3-sparse, [L1] gives Ny3V(G), and because V(G)y4 we have 1yV(G). Therefore AV(G)(y3V(G)+2yV(G)+1)(13y)V(G). Also, every vertex of A has fewer than 12y2N neighbours in N by definition of A.

step 2.1L1algebra
4.1

Let NN be the set of vertices with at most x2A neighbours in A, and put B:=NN. The number of edges between A and N is at most x2AN, so at most xA vertices of A have more than xN neighbours in N. Hence at least AxA(13yx)V(G)(14y)V(G) vertices of A have at most xN neighbours in N.

step 3.1L2algebra
5.1

If Ny4V(G), then step 4.1 gives a set YA with Y(14y)V(G) such that every vertex of Y has at most xN neighbours in N. By [L2], the pair (X,Y):=(N,Y) is then a forbidden large sparse pair, contradicting the hypothesis. Therefore N<y4V(G).

step 4.1L2assume-contradischarge-contradiction
6.1

Since N2y4V(G) by step 1.1 and N<y4V(G) by step 5.1, we have B=NNy4V(G). By definition of B, every vertex of B has more than x2A neighbours in A. Also step 3.1 gives at most 12y2N neighbours in N for each vertex of A, while step 5.1 implies B>N/2; hence 12y2N<y2B, so every vertex of A has at most y2B neighbours in B. Therefore A is y2-sparse to B.

step 1.1step 3.1step 5.1L2algebra
7.1

Step 3.1 gives AV(G)NG[v], step 1.1 gives BNG(v), and steps 3.1 and 6.1 give the size, sparsity, and neighbourhood clauses. These are exactly the four clauses of the statement.

step 1.1step 3.1step 6.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources