How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A -sparse set has self-density at most , and a -dense set has self-density at least
Statement
Let be a finite simple graph, let , and let be nonempty.
- If is -sparse, then .
- If is -dense, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite simple graph , a real , and a nonempty set .
A set is -sparse exactly when every vertex of the induced graph has degree at most (A set is -sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most times its size, -sparse, -dense and -restricted vertex sets).
The self-density is (Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets).
The ordered edge count satisfies (Double counting: for a relation between finite sets, The sum over a finite index set, and its product form).
Proof
If is -sparse, then [L1] bounds every summand in [L3] by , so .
Dividing the inequality of step 1.1 by and using [L2] gives .
If is -dense, then every vertex of has at most non-neighbours in , so it has at least neighbours in . Summing as in [L3] gives , and [L2] turns this into .
Depends on
- $c$-sparse, $c$-dense and $c$-restricted vertex sets
- Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets
- Double counting: $\sum_{x \in X}\lvert R_x\rvert = \lvert R\rvert = \sum_{y \in Y}\lvert R^y\rvert$ for a relation between finite sets
- The sum $\sum_{i \in S} a_i$ over a finite index set, and its product form
- A set is $c$-sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most $c$ times its size
Used by
- The edge-density form of Rödl's theorem implies the maximum-degree form, with ε and δ each shrunk by a constant factor Corollary
- The edge-density form of Rödl's theorem: every nonempty H-free graph has a linearly large set of self-density at most ε or at least 1-ε Corollary
- A star has tiny self-density, yet no restricted subset containing its centre has more than two vertices Counterexample
- A clique of size s has self-density 1-1/s Example
- Bounded degree against bounded density: the two statements of Rödl's theorem, and which one is stronger Remark
- Why the self-density bound for a dense set carries a 1/|X| slack Remark
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Chudnovsky, A. Scott, P. Seymour, and S. Spirkl, Strengthening Rödl's theorem, sec. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)