How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An absolutely irreducible SL2 representation has a quadratic trace-field model
Statement
Let be a field of characteristic zero and let be a representation of a finitely generated group which is absolutely irreducible, meaning that no line is invariant under all its matrices after extension to any field containing . Let be the subfield generated by the prime field and all traces , . There are words and and an element satisfying , with , such that over the representation is conjugate by a matrix in to one whose generator matrices all lie in . Thus the required model field has degree at most two over . The entries are obtained by explicit finite formulas from and the traces of for each generator matrix . If , its nonidentity automorphism is realized on this model by simultaneous conjugation with one explicit matrix in . In particular, suppose a projective point is obtained from the model by a construction commuting with field automorphisms and invariant under simultaneous conjugation. Then is defined over . This last clause requires the stated compatibility and invariance; it asserts no analytic, homology-rank or quotient-existence theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field, finitely generated group, absolutely irreducible representation and trace subfield in the Statement.
For a two-by-two matrix , direct multiplication gives . A matrix with two distinct eigenvalues has the corresponding eigenvectors as a basis. A quadratic polynomial with distinct roots gives either the trivial extension or a separable quadratic extension, whose nonidentity automorphism exchanges the roots.
Proof
Find a noncentral semisimple word and a word meeting both eigenspaces. Some group matrix has trace different from . Otherwise, if all matrices were scalar the representation would be reducible; choose a nonscalar with , and by [F1]. For every group matrix and integer , All these traces belong to by the supposition. In characteristic zero a nonconstant affine function on the nonnegative integers takes infinitely many values, so for every . In a basis over with this forces the lower-left entry of every to be zero. Its first coordinate line would be invariant, a contradiction. Thus choose a word with trace different from , and adjoin one root of its characteristic polynomial. Its two distinct eigenvalues are , so it is diagonalizable already over . In that eigenbasis some group word has both off-diagonal entries nonzero. Indeed the elements preserving the first and second eigenlines form two proper subgroups of by absolute irreducibility. A group cannot be the union of two proper subgroups: for elements in their respective differences, their product belongs to neither. Choose outside that union. These are finitely many existential selections, not an infinite choice principle.
Normalize and recover every generator by trace equations. In the chosen eigenbasis write and conjugate by to make this entry one. The lower-left entry becomes the nonzero product . Put , , . In the normalized basis All these entries lie in . For each generator put , , and , which belong to by its definition. Its diagonal entries are Its off-diagonal entries are uniquely solved from The determinant of this two-by-two linear system is . Thus every normalized generator matrix has entries in . These are the actual conjugated original matrices in , not merely formal matrices with the correct traces: the normalization was performed first and the displayed linear equations uniquely recover their entries. Therefore their determinant-one equations and every group relation hold in , by its injection into . The conjugated representation is an actual model over , with no new relator-existence assumption.
The quadratic swap is explicit conjugation. If there is nothing to prove. Otherwise its automorphism exchanges and and fixes every word trace. The formulas of step 2.1 give , . Put Direct multiplication gives and . For each generator , both and have traces when paired respectively with : conjugation preserves trace, and fixes the four word traces. The diagonal/off-diagonal recovery in step 2.1 applies to this swapped pair as well; its determinant is still nonzero. Uniqueness therefore gives for every generator, hence for all group words. This proves simultaneous conjugacy over itself, without an appeal to pointwise complex-character classification.
Projective descent for compatible invariant constructions. Under the hypotheses on , applying to its construction yields the point constructed from , while conjugation invariance and step 3.1 identify that point with . Hence . Choose one nonzero homogeneous coordinate and normalize it to . Equality of projective points implies that each ratio is fixed by . Every element of the quadratic field has the unique form with ; being fixed gives , so . Thus every normalized coordinate lies in , proving that is a -point. In the trivial-extension case this is immediate. The argument uses only finite matrix and field operations; it neither asserts that an arbitrary merely pointwise invariant assignment is rational nor supplies any analytic or chain-complex prerequisite for constructing .
Used by
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Bénard, Florens and Rodau, A slope invariant and the A-polynomial of knots (standard reference, not scraped)