How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The unit and counit transpose formulas are mutually inverse
Statement
Let have unit and counit . For every and ,
where transposition is defined in Adjuncts and transposition under an adjunction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An adjunction with unit and counit , objects , and morphisms and .
The triangle identities are and (Adjunction by unit, counit, and the triangle identities).
The transpose formulas are and (Adjuncts and transposition under an adjunction).
Proof
Expanding the first composite gives .
Naturality of at gives .
Expanding the second composite gives .
Naturality of at gives .
Substituting step 1.2 into step 1.1 and applying the first triangle identity yields .
Substituting step 1.4 into step 1.3 and applying the second triangle identity yields .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 7 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Leinster, Basic Category Theory, Lemmas 2.2.2 and 2.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Theorem 4.2.7 (standard reference, not scraped)