Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Anchored-box summation by parts for finite Hardy–Krause variation

Statement

Let N≥1, let P=(x0,…,xN−1) be a point multiset in [0,1)d, and let f:[0,1]d→R have finite upper-anchor Hardy–Krause variation. This finiteness implies that f is bounded and Riemann integrable by Finite Hardy–Krause variation implies bounded Riemann integrability, so QP(f) is defined. Let G be a finite coordinate grid containing every coordinate of every point of P, with knots 0=tj,0<⋯<tj,mj=1. Its lower-corner Riemann sum is Ck:=∏j=1d[tj,kj,tj,kj+1],SG(f):=∑0≤kj<mjf(t1,k1,…,td,kd)vol⁡(Ck), where the cells and volume convention are those of Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh and Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume, and SG is the lower-corner tagged Riemann sum of Tagged grid partitions and Riemann sums in Rm. Then ∣QP(f)−SG(f)∣≤DN∗(P)VHK,1(f), with the quadrature and star discrepancy of Star discrepancy, digital nets, and digital sequences and the variation of Hardy–Krause variation anchored at the upper corner.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite nonempty point multiset P⊂[0,1)d and a real-valued f with VHK,1(f)<∞.

[F1]

DN∗(P) is the supremum of the absolute empirical-minus-volume error on boxes ∏j[0,uj), and QP(f) is the average of f at the listed nodes. (Star discrepancy, digital nets, and digital sequences)

[F2]

VHK,1(f) is the sum over nonempty coordinate subsets of the Vitali variations of the restrictions with all complementary coordinates fixed at 1. (Hardy–Krause variation anchored at the upper corner)

[F3]

A coordinatewise grid is a finite product of one-dimensional partitions; adding finitely many coordinate knots refines the grid and does not increase its mesh. (Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh)

[F4]

The volume of a closed rectangle is the product of its side lengths. (Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume)

[F5]

A Riemann sum assigns one tag to each grid cell; lower corners are canonical tags and the sum is the sum of tag values times cell volumes. (Tagged grid partitions and Riemann sums in Rm)

[F6]

Finite upper-anchor Hardy–Krause variation implies bounded Riemann integrability, the domain required for QP(f). (Finite Hardy–Krause variation implies bounded Riemann integrability, Star discrepancy, digital nets, and digital sequences)

Proof

1.1F1F3F4F5F6given

Write the grid knots in coordinate j as 0=tj,0<⋯<tj,mj=1, and assign each point of P to its unique half-open cell Ck=∏j[tj,kj,tj,kj+1). Define cℓ=f(t1,ℓ1,…,td,ℓd) for every vertex index with 0≤ℓj≤mj; cell tags use the lower indices kj<mj. Put F(k)=N−1#{i:xi∈∏j[0,tj,kj)}−∏jtj,kj. Inclusion–exclusion in the d coordinates gives N−1#{i:xi∈Ck}−∏j(tj,kj+1−tj,kj)=Δ1⋯ΔdF(k), with ΔjF(k)=F(k+ej)−F(k). Also F(k)=0 if any kj=0, while F(m1,…,md)=0 because all points lie in [0,1)d and the full cube has volume 1. The grid contains every node coordinate, so the point's assigned cell has it as lower corner. Summing the cell identities weighted by ck gives QP(f)−SG(f)=∑kckΔ1⋯ΔdF(k).

2.1F1F2F6step 1.1algebra∎

For one coordinate, the finite summation-by-parts identity is ∑k=0m−1ak(bk+1−bk)=ambm−a0b0−∑k=1mbk(ak−ak−1). In each application here, the sequence b has b0=0: initially it is F with that coordinate index zero, and at each successive application it is a finite difference in other coordinates of such values of F. Step 1.1 gives F=0 whenever any coordinate index is zero, so these lower-boundary terms vanish throughout the iteration and the shortened identity with no a0b0 term is valid. Applying it successively in all d coordinates gives a sum over subsets u⊆{1,…,d}: the empty subset contributes cm1,…,mdF(m1,…,md)=0; for each nonempty u, the terms are (−1)∣u∣F(ku,m−u)Δuc(ku,m−u), summed over 1≤kj≤mj for j∈u. Here Δuc(ku,m−u) is the alternating sum of the 2∣u∣ vertex values with coordinate index kj−1+ϵj for j∈u and index mj for j∉u, weighted by (−1)∣u∣−∣ϵ∣. The identity follows by induction on the number of coordinates: the one-coordinate formula is the base case, and applying it in the next finite sum adds that coordinate to the subsets in the difference terms while giving the stated upper-boundary term. Each F(ku,m−u) is the discrepancy of the anchored box ∏j∈u[0,tj,kj)×∏j∉u[0,1), so its absolute value is at most DN∗(P) by [F1]. Each Δuc is exactly the alternating increment on a cell of the face with complementary coordinates fixed at 1; hence its absolute-value sum over that face grid is at most VV(fu). Summing over nonempty u and using [F2] gives ∣QP(f)−SG(f)∣≤DN∗(P)VHK,1(f).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources