Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A cyclic submodule is a residue module by its annihilator

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, let M be a left R-module, and let mM. Then the cyclic submodule Rm is naturally isomorphic to

R/AnnR(m).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, a left R-module M, and an element mM.

[L1]

The annihilator of m is AnnR(m)={rR:rm=0} (Annihilators, torsion elements and the torsion subset of a module).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define φ:R/AnnR(m)Rm by φ(r+AnnR(m))=rm. If rrAnnR(m), then (rr)m=0, so rm=rm; hence φ is well-defined. Every element of Rm has the form rm, so φ is surjective.

L1givenconstruct
2.1

If φ(r+AnnR(m))=0, then rm=0, so rAnnR(m) by [L1]. Thus r+AnnR(m)=0 and φ is injective.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that φ is the claimed natural isomorphism.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources