How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fusion paths give a basis of the fixed-boundary path space
Statement
Let be a complex fusion category, let be simple objects, and fix a basis of every finite-dimensional split space . Use the fixed representative set for internal labels and the chosen empty-path isomorphism of Fixed-boundary anyonic fusion-path space, retaining arbitrary simple external objects . For , every admissible path and every tuple of vertex indices gives a composite map of Fixed-boundary anyonic fusion-path space, and these maps form a basis of . Consequently,
At , separately, there is one empty path with vector when and no path otherwise; the displayed sum is for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex fusion category , simple objects , , and the vertex bases in the Statement.
Fixed-boundary anyonic fusion-path space: , , , and a path composite is built from inclusions .
Fusion and multifusion categories: every object of a fusion category is a finite direct sum of simple objects, and tensor product is bilinear and exact on morphisms.
Fusion rules: is the multiplicity of simple in and equals .
Absolutely simple objects: for simple , ; Hom spaces between nonisomorphic simple objects are zero.
Proof
Given: The category, boundary charges, site charge, and split-space bases above.
For , and [F4] gives when . If , composition with the chosen isomorphism identifies with , so the latter has basis . This is exactly the typed empty-path convention of [F1]. For , the path vectors are directly the chosen basis of , since the starting map is . This separately proves the positive-length base case without requiring the bases for isomorphic but unequal external objects to coincide.
Fix and assume for every simple endpoint that the length- path composites form a basis of .
By finite semisimplicity, the induction hypothesis decomposes , with one summand for each length- path ending at . Here ranges once over the fixed simple representatives, even when the external endpoints are different isomorphic objects. For each such , finite semisimplicity gives . Applying , all nonisomorphic simple summands vanish and each of the copies of contributes by [F4]. Hence and the specified inclusion basis has exactly that many vectors.
Choose retractions dual to the path inclusions in step 2.1. They exist by taking any semisimple decomposition and changing its inclusion basis to the given basis for each simple ; the inverse basis matrix changes its retractions. Thus and is the appropriate Kronecker identity. Tensoring gives a direct-sum decomposition of with inclusions and retractions . Applying therefore gives the isomorphism sending to . Its inverse applies each displayed retraction. Inserting the specified basis in each summand gives exactly the length- path composites of [F1], so they form a basis, including when the external differs from its representative.
For , step 3.1 shows that each admissible path contributes one basis vector for every tuple of vertex indices, hence contributes vectors. Summing over the finitely many internal simple labels gives the displayed dimension; every sum is finite because the category has finitely many simple isomorphism classes and is finite. Step 1.1 gives the separate count. Induction completes the basis proof and count.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David Penneys, Unitary Fusion Categories, Math 8800 lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories (standard reference, not scraped)