Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

In the Artin–Tate setup the intermediate ring is module-finite over the coefficient subalgebra

Statement

Keep the data and the notation of The Artin–Tate coefficient subalgebra is a Noetherian algebra of finite type: commutative rings ABC, each a subring of the next, with A Noetherian, C=A[t1,,tr], a B-module generating list y1,,yn of C with y1=1C, coefficients zij,zijkB as displayed there, and A the A-subalgebra of B they generate.

Then C is generated as an A-module by y1,,yn, so C is module-finite over A; and B is module-finite over A as well (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data of The Artin–Tate coefficient subalgebra is a Noetherian algebra of finite type, and the set M:=j=1nAyj={j=1najyj:ajA}C.

[L1]

In that setup AAB, the algebra A is of finite type over A, and A is a Noetherian ring (The Artin–Tate coefficient subalgebra is a Noetherian algebra of finite type).

[L2]

R[a1,,an] is the smallest subring of A containing the image of R and a1,,an; an algebra is module-finite over R when it is finitely generated as an R-module (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[L3]

For a ring R, a left R-module M and SM, the submodule SR is the set of finite sums i=1krisi with kN, riR and siS (The submodule generated by a subset consists of the finite R-linear combinations of that subset).

[L4]

Let A be a Noetherian commutative ring and B a commutative A-algebra module-finite over A with A a subring of B; then every ring C with ACB is module-finite over A and is a Noetherian ring (A module-finite algebra over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, and so is every ring between the two).

[L5]

A subring contains the identity of the ambient ring and is closed under sums, additive inverses and products (Subring: a subset containing 1R and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The set M=j=1nAyj is the A-submodule of C generated by y1,,yn, by the finite-sum description of a generated submodule; it is in particular an additive subgroup of C closed under multiplication by elements of A. Since y1=1C we have A=Ay1M, and therefore AM and 1CM.

L1L3L5given
2.1

M is closed under multiplication, hence is a subring of C. It suffices to multiply two generators with coefficients: for a,aA, (ayi)(ayj)=aa(yiyj)=aak=1nzijkyk=k=1n(aazijk)yk, and each aazijk lies in A because A is a subring of B containing every zijk. A product of two elements of M expands by distributivity into a finite sum of such terms, so it lies in M; with the additive subgroup property and 1CM from step 1.1, M is a subring of C.

L1L3L5step 1.1
3.1

M contains each ti, since ti=j=1nzijyj and every zij lies in A. So M is a subring of C containing A and t1,,tr. But C=A[t1,,tr] is the smallest such subring, so CM; and MC by construction. Hence C=M, and y1,,yn generate C as an A-module, so C is module-finite over A.

L2L3step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Now A is a Noetherian commutative ring, A is a subring of C, and C is module-finite over A; the intermediate-ring clause applied to ABC gives that B is module-finite over A.

L1L4step 3.1

Remarks

  • No induction on total degree is needed. Showing directly that jAyj is a subring containing A and the algebra generators, and then invoking minimality of A[t1,,tr], replaces the degreewise reduction of a polynomial expression; the multiplication table yiyj=kzijkyk is exactly what makes the closure argument work in one line.

  • y1=1C is used, and used here. It is what puts A itself inside M, without which M need not contain A and the minimality argument would not apply.

  • Only A is known to be Noetherian. The final step is applied with A as the Noetherian base, never with B, which is exactly the point of the Artin–Tate argument.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources