How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Associated graded quotients are well defined subquotients
Statement
The associated graded quotients of a filtered object exist as subquotients of the ambient object, independently up to unique compatible isomorphism of the monomorphisms representing its subobjects.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A filtered object and two systems of compatible monomorphisms representing its subobjects.
For an increasing filtration, is the cokernel of ; for a decreasing filtration, is the cokernel of (Associated graded object of a filtered object).
Quotients exist in the abelian category and maps preserving subobjects descend uniquely (Spectral sequence subquotient and local lifting calculus).
Proof
Choose the specified representatives . Subobject containment gives with . If , then , hence . Thus is monic and its cokernel exists, giving the subquotient in [F1].
For a decreasing filtration choose representatives . The containment gives with . The same monic-cancellation argument as in step 1.1 makes monic, so its cokernel is the decreasing associated-graded subquotient. Equivalently, this is step 1.1 after translating by .
Replace either system of representatives by a compatible primed system and let be the compatible isomorphisms. Monicity in gives in the increasing case and in the decreasing case. By [F2], and descend to maps of the respective cokernels. Their composites are identities because they agree with the identities after the epic quotient projections; the same cancellation proves uniqueness. This covers equal adjacent pieces and zero pieces in both conventions.
Source notes
Weibel, Chapter 5, §5.2 pp.122–125 and Definitions 5.4.2–4 pp.132–133; Sharifi, §4.1 pp.87–89 and Definition 4.2.1 p.90.
Depends on
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Associated graded object of a filtered object.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Romyar Sharifi, Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)