Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Asymptotic induction identifies leading modular simples

Statement

In the finite-Weyl setting of Finite-Weyl Lusztig data and the precise basic-set hypotheses, assume its specified Lusztig properties and let θ:A→k have characteristic zero or satisfy θ(fE)≠0 for every generic simple label E. Write H=Hk, and let VE be the corresponding simple module of the split asymptotic algebra Jk, supported in degree αE. A star denotes restriction through ϕk:H→Jk.

For each simple H-module M, let aM=max⁡{a(w):DwM≠0}, where Dw=Cw†. There is an injective assignment M↦E(M) such that αE(M)=aM, M occurs once in ∗VE(M), and all its other simple factors have strictly smaller a-value. Moreover H is split: every simple H-module remains simple over every field extension.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated finite-Weyl data, exact Lusztig-property hypotheses and good-characteristic specialization.

[F1]

The finite filtration Ii=⟨Dw:a(w)≥i⟩ has two-sided ideals, I0=H, IN+1=0, and layers Bi=Ii/Ii+1 carrying commuting left Jk and right H actions. The original left H action equals restriction through ϕk. The left Jk action on Bi is supported in degree i (Finite-Weyl Lusztig data and the precise basic-set hypotheses, The asymptotic algebra, filtered layers and the specialization homomorphism).

[F2]

Jk is split semisimple, with simples VE supported in degree αE (Leading Schur coefficients and split good-characteristic asymptotic specializations).

Proof

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

Every simple H-module M is finite-dimensional, since for 0≠m∈M the map H→M, h↦hm, is surjective. Since D1=1, the maximum a=aM exists; Ia+1M=0 and IaM≠0. Set T(M)=Ba⊗HM. Its map π:T(M)→M, [f]⊗m↦fm, is well-defined: changing f by Ia+1 changes no value, and the tensor balancing relation is respected. It is H-linear by multiplication and nonzero by IaM≠0, so it is surjective.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

If x=∑j[fj]⊗mj∈ker⁡π and g∈Ia, then gx=∑j[gfj]⊗mj=[g]⊗∑jfjmj=0 by tensor balancing. Thus Ia annihilates ker⁡π. Every simple factor M′ of that kernel has aM′<a, because all Dw with a(w)≥a belong to Ia. In particular [∗T(M):M]=1. Every Jk-simple factor of T(M) has degree a, by the degree support of Ba.

3.1F2step 2.1constructalgebra

Decompose the semisimple Jk-module T(M)=⨁EVEmE. Restriction preserves the direct sum. The equality [∗T(M):M]=1 implies that exactly one occurring label E has M as a factor of ∗VE, and both mE and [∗VE:M] equal one. Define this label to be E(M). Its degree is αE(M)=aM. The direct-sum inclusion of this ∗VE into ∗T(M) and step 2.1 show that all its other simple factors have strictly smaller a-value. If E(M)=E(M′), differing a-values would contradict their common degree; at equal degree the unique factor just proved forces M≅M′. This proves the assignment's injectivity.

4.1F2step 3.1algebra

Put Δ=End⁡H(M). A nonzero endomorphism of the simple finite-dimensional module is bijective, so Δ is a division k-algebra. It acts on T(M) by 1⊗d, commuting with Jk. Consequently it preserves every Jk-isotypic component. The E(M)-component has multiplicity one, so restriction gives a unital homomorphism Δ→End⁡Jk(VE(M))=k. The equality on the right follows from the full matrix block of the split algebra Jk. The homomorphism's kernel is zero because Δ is a division algebra, and its image contains all scalar maps. Thus Δ=k.

5.1step 4.1choosealgebra∎

We verify explicitly that Δ=k implies absolute simplicity here. A finite direct sum of copies of a simple module is semisimple: by induction, every submodule has a complement. Indeed, in S⊕U, split its intersection with U by the induction hypothesis, quotient that intersection, and consider its projection to S; this is zero or S, and in the latter case the remaining submodule is the graph of a homomorphism from S into the remaining summand of U. That graph has the remaining U as a complement. Now choose a k-basis m1,…,mr of M. The image of H→Mr, h↦(hm1,…,hmr), is a submodule. If it were proper, semisimplicity would give a nonzero map Mr→M vanishing on that image. Its components belong to End⁡H(M)=k, so they are scalars ci, not all zero. Evaluating at h=1 would give ∑icimi=0, contrary to basis independence. Thus the map is surjective. Every prescribed list of images of the basis is realized by some h, proving that H→End⁡k(M) is surjective. After any field extension, its image remains the full matrix algebra acting on the extended vector space; its standard module is simple. Hence every M is absolutely simple, and H is split.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources