Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Syzygies of a base-flat module over a flat algebra stay base-flat and fibrewise exact

Statement

Let R→P be a flat ring map, let M be a P-module flat over R, and let 0→Kn→Fn−1→⋯→F0→M→0 be an exact sequence of P-modules with n≥1 and each Fj free over P. Then every intermediate syzygy, including Kn, is flat over R. For every ring map R→R′, the sequence obtained by tensoring every term with R′ over R is still exact. In particular this holds for a residue field R′=κ(p) and after localizing the result at a prime of P⊗RR′.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The flat algebra, base-flat module, and exact free partial resolution.

[F1]

In a short exact sequence 0→A→B→C→0, if C is flat over R, tensoring with any R-module preserves the short exact sequence (A short exact sequence with flat quotient remains short exact after tensoring).

[F2]

A module is flat when tensoring preserves injections; free P-modules are R-flat because P is R-flat (Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests).

[F3]

Localization preserves exact sequences of modules (Localisation of modules is exact).

Proof

technique · move from the quotient $M$ upward through the free resolution, using a tensor diagram to show that each new kernel is flat
1.1F2

Put K0=M and, for j≥1, write the resolution as short exact sequences 0→Kj→Fj−1→Kj−1→0. The base K0=M is R-flat by hypothesis, and each Fj−1 is R-flat by [F2].

2.1F1F2step 1.1

Suppose Kj−1 is R-flat. By [F1], the sequence in step 1.1 stays short exact after tensoring with any R-module N. To show Kj is flat, take any injection N′↪N and compare the two tensored short exact rows. The vertical map Fj−1⊗RN′→Fj−1⊗RN is injective by [F2]. Since Kj⊗RN′ injects into the first free-module tensor, an element killed by Kj⊗RN′→Kj⊗RN must already be zero. Thus this latter map is injective, and [F2] makes Kj R-flat. Repeat for j=1,…,n.

3.1F1F3step 1.1step 2.1∎

Each short exact sequence of step 1.1 remains exact after tensoring with R′ by [F1], because its quotient Kj−1 is now known to be R-flat. Splicing these tensored sequences yields exactness of the full base-changed resolution. Localization preserves exactness by [F3], so the same is true at every prime of its base-changed algebra. No choice principle is used: the free resolution is part of the given data.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources