Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniform closed nowhere-dense covers for Borel meagre sections

Statement

If H⊆2ω×2ω is Borel and every vertical section Hx is meagre, there are Borel maps x↦Fj(x) into codes for closed nowhere-dense subsets of 2ω such that Hx⊆⋃jFj(x) for every x.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Borel set H with meagre vertical sections.

[F2]

A meagre set lies in a countable union of closed nowhere-dense sets. (Nowhere dense, meagre, residual, and comeagre subsets of a topological space)

Proof

technique · uniform Baire-property induction on a Borel code
1.1

Code an open section by a subset of the fixed cylinder list. If its code is Borel in x, then the relation Us∩Ox≠∅ is Borel: it is the countable disjunction over listed cylinders Ut of the finite test Us∩Ut≠∅. Consequently the open set Ox′=2ω∖Ox‾=⋃{Us:Us∩Ox=∅} has a Borel open code in x. Its boundary error Dx=2ω∖(Ox∪Ox′)=Ox‾∖Ox has a Borel closed code, is closed, and is nowhere dense: every open set meeting Ox‾ meets Ox, hence no nonempty open set is contained in Dx.

F1
1.2

We construct for every Borel B⊆2ω×2ω a Borel open-section code Ox and Borel closed nowhere-dense-section codes Fj(x) satisfying Bx△Ox⊆⋃jFj(x). For an open product set, list all basic product rectangles contained in it; their second-factor cylinders with first factor containing x form the desired open section. Its error list is empty.

F1base
2.1

For B=⋃iBi, use the induction data (Oi,Fi,j) and put O=⋃iOi. If y∈Bx∖Ox, it lies in some (Bi)x∖(Oi)x. If y∈Ox∖Bx, it lies in some (Oi)x∖(Bi)x. Thus the symmetric difference is covered by the countable list (Fi,j(x))i,j. The union open code and paired error list are Borel in x.

step 1.2IH
2.2

For Bc, let O′ be the interior of the complement of O from step 1.1. Complementing both B and O preserves their symmetric difference, while (2ω∖Ox)∖Ox′=Dx. Hence (Bc)x△Ox′⊆Dx∪⋃jFj(x). Append the Borel closed nowhere-dense code Dx to the old error list.

step 1.1step 1.2IH
3.1

Every Borel set has a well-founded countable code built from open sets by complement and countable union. Recursion on that code using steps 1.2, 2.1, and 2.2 gives the asserted Borel data for H.

step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

For a fixed x, both Hx and its error set are meagre, so the open set Ox is meagre. But no nonempty open subset of Cantor space is meagre. To see this directly, start with a cylinder inside such an open set and, against a given sequence of closed nowhere-dense sets, repeatedly choose the first strictly smaller subcylinder avoiding the next closed set. The nested finite words determine a point in the open set outside their union. Hence Ox is empty and Hx⊆⋃jFj(x). The recursion and least-cylinder fusion use fixed countable enumerations and no countable-choice selection of sectionwise covers. ∎

step 3.1F2discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources