How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bott–Samelson bimodules carry delta and nabla support filtrations
Statement
Let be a word in simple reflections and , with . Then belongs to both and : it has a -flag and a -flag in the sense of Standard graph bimodules, support filtrations and characters, its support is contained in , and each successive quotient of these flags is a standard bimodule with a product () of a subexpression of formed by keeping letters; the Coxeter length can be smaller than . The shift of an occurrence is computed recursively, one step per letter of , from the two rank-one exact sequences of step 1.2 below: the -chart and the -chart use the two different sequences, so the shift depends on the chosen subexpression and on the chart, and it is not a function of the lengths and descent numbers of the subexpression alone: for the one-letter word the -chart occurrences are and , while the -chart occurrences are the translates and of the same two subexpressions, so the same subexpression carries different shifts in the two charts. In particular the number of occurrences of a graph in the -flag and in the -flag of is the number of subexpressions of with product . Moreover is finite free of rank as a left -module and as a right -module, and the flag categories are closed under tensoring with a generator on either side: if then and , and likewise with in place of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A word of simple reflections, the rank-one bimodules , and for a standard bimodule the notation for its internal shift by (generator in degree ).
The two exact sequences and of graded -bimodules with all maps of degree zero, and the right action of on in the basis (degree ) and (degree ) (Standard graph bimodules, support filtrations and characters).
is free of rank two as a left and as a right -module, and an iterated tensor product of the is finite free of rank on each side (Soergel generators and Bott–Samelson products are finite free on both sides).
by the balanced map , and the graded Hom formula for and otherwise (Standard graph bimodules, support filtrations and characters).
Imported from Soergel Proposition 5.7(1) and its dual Proposition 5.9(1), with the recursions of their proofs, stated in the normalization of this page: if then and if then ; in both cases the quotients of the resulting flag are again standard bimodules, indexed by the quotients of the flag of , and, for , the multiplicities satisfy and dually the source's shifted reflection functor of his Notation 5.6 being exactly the library functor , which differs from the unshifted by the internal shift recorded in step 1.1 below (Standard graph bimodules, support filtrations and characters).
Opposite bimodules: through the flip, , , the length filtrations of and agree, and a -flag of with quotients is a -flag of with quotients in the same order, while a -flag of is a -flag of in the same order, so that the opposite functor preserves each flag category separately: if and only if , and if and only if (Standard graph bimodules, support filtrations and characters).
Proof
Write for the unshifted balanced tensor functor; Soergel's shifted reflection functor, whose recursions [F4] records, is . Since and shifts may be moved across a balanced tensor product, for every graded bimodule , and associativity of with gives the empty word gives , which is its own -flag and -flag, and an internal shift preserves the flag categories because it changes only internal degrees and not supports.
One-step calculus: a standard bimodule is free of rank one as a right -module, so the functor is exact, and applying it to the two short exact sequences of [F1], whose total space is , and identifying the outer terms by [F3] gives the two exact sequences whose outer terms are standard bimodules with graph indices and and shifts differing by one; the first sequence exhibits the -graph as a sub-bimodule and the second exhibits the -graph as a sub-bimodule of the same total space, so has a two-term flag in either order. Taking opposites with [F5] turns these two sequences into the corresponding two sequences for , whose outer terms have the graph indices and and again differ by one in shift.
Membership: by [F4] the functor carries into and into , and by step 1.1 it differs from the unshifted balanced tensor functor by the internal shift , which preserves both categories because it changes only degrees, so carries each flag category into itself. Induction on the number of letters in the normal form of step 1.1 therefore gives together with a -flag and a -flag; the empty word is the single layer of step 1.1.
Quotient and shift bookkeeping: by the recursions of [F4], read in the direction of the contribution of an old quotient, a flag quotient of with graph and index contributes to the -flag of the two quotients with graph and index , and with graph and index when respectively index when ; in the -chart the same pair of recursions holds with the two signs exchanged, which is the dual pair of [F4]. Iterating this along the letters of , each flag quotient of arises from a choice, at every letter , of keeping the graph or multiplying it by on the left, so its graph is the subexpression product of the kept letters, and its normalized index is unchanged at each graph-changing branch and changes by only at a graph-preserving branch, with the sign specified above. The recursion is applied from the rightmost letter to the leftmost letter, so the final graph is the subexpression product in its original order. For the unnormalized generator degree in the -chart or in the -chart, each branch changes by , since ; the -chart is governed by the dual pair of recursions of [F4]. The two branches at a letter give different graphs, since for a simple reflection , so the number of occurrences of a graph equals the number of those subexpressions of whose product is ; for the one-letter word the two charts give the two displayed pairs of the statement.
Right tensors: let . By [F5] , so by [F4]; applying [F5] again, lies in , since the opposite functor preserves the -flag category. The same argument with the roles of and exchanged, using that the opposite functor preserves the -flag category as well, gives the closure clause for .
Freeness and rank: [F2] gives that is finite free of rank on each side, and each layer is free of rank one on each side; the support of , a finite union of graphs, is contained in because every flag quotient is a standard bimodule of a permutation, and the internal shifts change only degrees. ∎
Depends on
Used by
- Bott–Samelson words related by a braid need not be isomorphic bimodules Counterexample
- Special Bott–Samelson Hom formula before reflection localization Lemma
- The rank-one Soergel bimodule square splits Lemma
- The type-A character recursion under simple Soergel tensoring Lemma
- The type-A standard character is multiplicative Lemma
- The type-A support filtration multiplicities are intrinsic Lemma
- Type-A top support layers are controlled by reflection localization Lemma
- The type-A Soergel Hom formula Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Soergel, Kazhdan–Lusztig-Polynome und unzerlegbare Bimoduln, Proposition 5.7(1), 5.9(1), PDF pp.13–16 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Elias–Williamson, Soergel Calculus, §§3.4, 5–7 (standard reference, not scraped)