How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Carleson density selection
Statement
Assume AC. Let S be a finite tile family, E a finite-measure testing set and N a measurable selector, and let . There is a partition of S into a remainder of density at most and finitely many trees with designated tops satisfying . The constant depends only on the fixed exponent .
Facts & Assumptions
Density uses all dominating tiles, the weight with exponent 20, and designated forest tops Density size and tree count for carleson tiles.
Assume AC The Axiom of Choice, as in F1's packet conventions.
Proof
Given: The finite family S with positive density delta.
Write . Consider all tiles t dominating some s in S and satisfying . They form a finite nonempty set: implies , while domination implies . Only finitely many dyadic scales lie in this range; at each scale there is one spatial ancestor of each fixed s and finitely many frequency subintervals of its frequency interval. Nonemptiness follows from the definition of positive supremum delta. Let Tops be the maximal members of this finite set. Assign each s lying below a member of Tops to one such top using a fixed finite ordering. This gives disjoint trees. Every s left over has density at most : otherwise a witness t with would dominate s and extend to a maximal candidate.
For a top t let , , and let be the interval with the same center and length . There is an integer with , where c is an absolute positive constant fixed below. Indeed, partition the line into I and the shells for k>=1. On the kth shell for , and the same bound with k=0 dominates its value on I. If every proposed mass bound failed, then . Taking makes this less than , contradicting the choice of t. Assign the least successful k to t, and call its assigned family .
Fix k. Greedily choose from a tile with greatest spatial length, retain it, and remove every remaining tile whose enlarged rectangle intersects its enlarged rectangle. Continue until none remain; this is a finite procedure. Retained enlarged rectangles are disjoint, so their sets are disjoint. Step 2.1 gives .
A tile s removed by a retained t has and overlapping frequency intervals; dyadic nesting and reciprocal lengths imply . All tiles removed by this same t therefore have mutually overlapping, hence nested, frequency intervals. Since Tops is an antichain, their original spatial intervals must be pairwise disjoint: otherwise dyadic nesting of both coordinates would make two tops comparable. Also overlap of the enlarged spatial intervals implies each original lies in the interval centered at of radius . Thus the sum of their lengths is at most . Including t itself in its removed family, and using step 3.1, yields . Summing over k gives . Together with step 1.1 this proves the partition and count assertion. Empty assigned trees may be deleted, only reducing the count. AC is inherited; the selections here are finite greedy choices and least integers.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lacey, Carleson’s Theorem: Proof, Complements, Variations (standard reference, not scraped)