How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Casimir separates comparable dominant primitive weights
Statement
For a finite symmetrizable GCM, fix the invariant form, positive symmetrizer and . Every integrable is the algebraic direct sum of its Casimir generalized eigenspaces These are integrable submodules. In each summand the primitive weights are dominant integral and form an antichain in the positive-root order. The argument is choice-free; it does not assume a positive-definite full Cartan form or a factorization theorem for arbitrary complex polynomials.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated symmetrizable data and integrable module.
The restricted Casimir is central and acts on a highest vector of weight by (Generalized kac moody casimir is central and scalar on highest weight modules).
The invariant form gives with (Invariant bilinear form for a symmetrizable kac moody algebra).
Primitive weights of an integrable module are dominant integral (Maximal and primitive weights in integrable category O modules).
The Casimir formula is pointwise finite, with and positive-then-negative root factors (Generalized casimir on restricted kac moody modules).
Finite upper support sets make modules restricted; submodules and quotients inherit the weight decomposition and bounds (Kac moody category o).
Proof
The formula F4 on gives . It preserves the weight and the sum is finite by F5. Every nonzero lies at a strictly higher support weight. Induct on the finite number of support weights at or above . At a maximal weight the displayed right side is zero, so annihilates under . Inductively choose for each of the finitely many nonzero vectors on the right an annihilating polynomial that is a product of linear factors. Their product annihilates the right side because F1 commutes through each . Thus . A general vector has finitely many weight components; the product of their annihilators works for it. Zero vectors allow the constant polynomial . Therefore every vector has an annihilator already split into linear factors, without using the fundamental theorem of algebra.
Let annihilate , with distinct finite and . Put , , and . Since and is divisible by , the polynomial is modulo and zero modulo each for . These congruences imply is divisible by : powers of distinct linear factors are coprime, as the same finite inverse construction shows, so divisibility by each factor can be combined successively. Set . Then is divisible by , hence , and . If a finite sum of generalized eigenvectors at distinct eigenvalues is zero, take a product with exponents large enough to annihilate every summand and apply its to that relation. It extracts precisely the summand, proving uniqueness and that the sum of all is direct. Uniqueness makes the components independent of the chosen annihilator.
Each is a linear subspace: a maximum of two exponents annihilates a sum. Centrality F1 makes it stable under every generator. By F5 it is in with its induced weights, and simple local nilpotence restricts from . The same Casimir formula preserves every submodule and induces the identical operator on a quotient, because its terms are pointwise finite algebra actions. If a primitive vector of weight in has nonzero highest class in a quotient, F1 gives , while some power of kills it. Therefore forces . F3 gives dominant integrality of this weight.
If two such dominant primitive weights satisfy , write with nonnegative integers , at least one positive. Symmetry of the form and F2 give Every summand is a nonnegative real number and at least one is strictly positive, although the separate Casimir eigenvalues may be complex. This contradicts their common value from 3.1. Hence the primitive weights form an antichain. For equal weights the difference is zero; zero simple labels still leave the positive term. The zero module has the empty direct sum, a single eigenvalue requires only one projector, and all choices of annihilators or bounds in 1.1–2.1 are finite. No AC or positivity of the full bilinear form was used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kleshchev, Lectures on Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)
- Perrin, Introduction to Kac-Moody Groups and Lie Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)