Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (openai/gpt-5.4)audited 2026-07-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A non-null Cauchy sequence is eventually bounded away from zero, with constant sign

Statement

If (an)(a_n) is Cauchy but not null, there are a rational δ>0\delta > 0 and an index N0N_0 such that an>δ|a_n| > \delta for all nN0n \ge N_0; moreover either an>δa_n > \delta for all nN0n \ge N_0, or an<δa_n < -\delta for all nN0n \ge N_0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Cauchy sequence (an)(a_n) that is not null.

[A1]

Negation of null (Null sequence): there is a rational ε0>0\varepsilon_0 > 0 such that for every NN some nNn \ge N has anε0|a_n| \ge \varepsilon_0.

[L1]

Ordered-field arithmetic: ε0/3>0\varepsilon_0/3 > 0, ε0ε0/3>ε0/3\varepsilon_0 - \varepsilon_0/3 > \varepsilon_0/3 (The rationals form a totally ordered field).

[L2]

Triangle inequality, in the form uvvu|u| \ge |v| - |v - u| (Absolute value and the triangle inequality).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix ε0>0\varepsilon_0 > 0 witnessing that (an)(a_n) is not null.

A1
1.2

Fix N0N_0 with aman<ε0/3|a_m - a_n| < \varepsilon_0/3 for all m,nN0m, n \ge N_0.

A2L1
2.1

Pick n0N0n_0 \ge N_0 with an0ε0|a_{n_0}| \ge \varepsilon_0.

step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

For every nN0n \ge N_0: anan0an0an>ε0ε0/3>ε0/3=:δ|a_n| \ge |a_{n_0}| - |a_{n_0} - a_n| > \varepsilon_0 - \varepsilon_0/3 > \varepsilon_0/3 =: \delta; so an>δ|a_n| > \delta for all nN0n \ge N_0.

step 2.1step 1.2L2L1
4.1

Sign stability: if some am>δa_m > \delta and some an<δa_n < -\delta with m,nN0m, n \ge N_0, then aman>2δ=2ε0/3>ε0/3|a_m - a_n| > 2\delta = 2\varepsilon_0/3 > \varepsilon_0/3, impossible by step 1.2; so beyond N0N_0 all terms have one sign, and by step 3.1 either an>δa_n > \delta for all nN0n \ge N_0 or an<δa_n < -\delta for all nN0n \ge N_0.

step 3.1step 1.2L1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources