How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Wall form of an orthogonal operator, subspace restriction, and the interval structure of the orthogonal reflection-length order
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional real inner product space (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length); on this page with the positive definite Coxeter form of a Coxeter system of finite type (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Finiteness criterion: W is finite exactly when the Coxeter form is positive definite), and is the group of -preserving invertible linear maps (Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces). Let , and be as in Reflection length, the absolute order on a finite Coxeter group, and the moved and fixed spaces of an orthogonal operator. Then:
(1) Basic identities. For every one has , , , , , , and is a bijection (In finite dimension, and , Rank-nullity: ). For all , and hence .
(2) The Wall form. For put
Then is a bilinear form on satisfying
in particular is nondegenerate and its symmetric part is (The adjoint is characterised by , Adjoints satisfy , , , and ).
(3) Subspace restriction. Let , let be a subspace and let be the orthogonal projection (The orthogonal projection is the -component in , For a subspace of a finite-dimensional inner product space, ). There is a unique with for all , and it satisfies , so that is invertible. Define by for and on . Then and
An element is a reflection (that is, ) if and only if for the line ; in particular every line is the moved space of exactly one reflection of (For an endomorphism in finite dimension, preserving lengths, preserving inner products, carrying orthonormal bases to orthonormal bases, and are equivalent).
(4) The restriction theorem. For every subspace one has , that is ; and for one has , hence . Conversely every with satisfies , and . Consequently the assignment is a bijection from the set of subspaces of onto , with inverse , and it is an order isomorphism for inclusion of subspaces and .
(5) Rank-length equality and prefixes. Let and let be reflections with . Then , and is a product of exactly reflections. Moreover if and only if there are a shortest factorization (so ) and an index with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional real inner product space with the positive definite Coxeter form of a finite-type Coxeter system, an element , and the moved space , the fixed space and the relation of Reflection length, the absolute order on a finite Coxeter group, and the moved and fixed spaces of an orthogonal operator.
For a linear map with finite-dimensional, ; in particular an injective endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space is bijective. Rank-nullity:
For a subspace of a finite-dimensional inner product space, , and . For a subspace of a finite-dimensional inner product space, In finite dimension, and
The orthogonal projection sends with , to ; equivalently is the unique vector of with , and for every . The projection is linear: combining the unique decompositions of and gives . The orthogonal projection is the -component in
means that is invertible and for all ; equivalently for all . Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces For an endomorphism in finite dimension, preserving lengths, preserving inner products, carrying orthonormal bases to orthonormal bases, and are equivalent
is symmetric and bilinear, and positive definite: with only for ; consequently is nondegenerate, so for all implies , and the same holds for the restriction of to any subspace. Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length Finiteness criterion: W is finite exactly when the Coxeter form is positive definite
, and holds if and only if ; no order property of is asserted by the definition. Reflection length, the absolute order on a finite Coxeter group, and the moved and fixed spaces of an orthogonal operator
Proof
For one has for all by [F4], so holds exactly when and hence exactly when , that is, when ; thus . Since holds exactly when , one has , and shows . Consequently , and [F2] gives , and . Moreover , so ; and with equality because is injective.
For the identity gives ; the invertible restricts to an injective map , whose image therefore has dimension by [F1]; consequently .
By step 1.1 the direct sum gives , so the restriction , whose image lies in the -stable space , has trivial kernel and is therefore injective; by [F1] it is bijective, and is defined.
Let with , put and let be the orthogonal projection onto [F3]. By step 1.1 the line and the space are -stable, so fixes pointwise; for one has with , and since preserves by [F4] and by [F5], forces , while would put ; hence and . Conversely if is a line then acts as on and as the identity on , so it preserves and is invertible, and has dimension one; if is a reflection with , the first part applied to gives . Hence every line is the moved space of exactly one reflection of , namely .
Applying step 2.1 to the orthogonal element , whose moved space is by step 1.1, gives the bijection . For put and , so that and ; then , using [F4] and symmetry of . Moreover on the -stable space , so the inverse there is and .
The Wall form is bilinear on , and for the transpose identity of step 3.1 gives , so . If for all , then vanishes on and, since , also on , hence on ; by [F5] , and is injective, so : the form is nondegenerate, and its symmetric part is on .
Let and define . For , [F3] gives ; if another operator has these pairings, its difference from pairs to zero with every , so it equals by [F5]. Define , with from step 3.1. That step and [F3] give , so is the adjoint of The adjoint is characterised by . Since , compression to gives . If , then by step 4.1, hence ; thus is injective and invertible by [F1], including when .
Define by for and on ; this is well defined and linear because [F2]. Then has image , so and . Put and ; inverting the transpose relation of step 5.1 shows that is the transpose of , that is, for all . Multiplying on the left by and on the right by , and also on the left by and on the right by , gives , hence . Therefore for all , the transpose of being ; on the operator is the identity, and , so preserves on . If , then for every , so by [F5] and is injective, hence invertible by [F1]: thus .
Fix and let be as in step 6.1. In the direct sum of step 1.1 write ; then , so exactly when . With this equation reads , and it is consistent because is step 5.1: the solutions are exactly the with and arbitrary. Hence has dimension , so . Since , the space is the image of under and has the same dimension ; therefore , that is, by [F6].
Let and put , so that by [F6]. Since , one has , and comparing dimensions gives ; in particular . Fix and write with and ; then with and , so comparing the two direct summands gives and . Hence , where the first equality uses step 1.1 applied to ; therefore for all one has , because . Thus the operator defined by on in step 5.1 is , and the construction of step 6.1 for and gives on and on , while on and on by step 1.1, so .
Let and apply step 6.1 to , whose moved space is . Since , the Wall form of on is ; for this equals by step 5.1, because and . Hence the operator attached to and by step 5.1 is again , and the construction of step 6.1 gives ; applying step 7.1 with in place of and the subspace then gives .
Let be reflections and ; since by step 2.2, the subadditivity of step 1.2 gives . Conversely every is a product of exactly reflections: if then is the empty product, and otherwise one picks a line and applies step 7.1 to , obtaining , so by induction on the element is a product of reflections and is a product of of them.
The assignment from subspaces of to is injective, because forces by step 6.1, and surjective by step 7.2; with inverse it is a bijection. It is an order isomorphism: if then by step 8.1, and conversely gives by the inclusion clause of step 7.2.
Suppose with and ; the are involutions by step 2.2, so , whence and by step 8.2, while by step 1.2; both inequalities are therefore equalities and by [F6].
Conversely, if , write with and with , both by the factorization clause of step 8.2; then is a product of reflections by [F6], that is, a shortest factorization of by step 8.2, of which is the prefix of length .
Depends on
- In finite dimension, $W^{\perp\perp}=W$ and $\dim W+\dim W^\perp=\dim V$
- The adjoint $T^*:W\to V$ is characterised by $\langle Tv,w\rangle_W=\langle v,T^*w\rangle_V$
- The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps
- Reflection length, the absolute order on a finite Coxeter group, and the moved and fixed spaces of an orthogonal operator
- Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces
- The orthogonal projection $P_Wv$ is the $W$-component in $V=W\oplus W^\perp$
- Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length
- Adjoints satisfy $(S+T)^*=S^*+T^*$, $(\lambda T)^*=\overline\lambda T^*$, $(ST)^*=T^*S^*$, and $T^{**}=T$
- Finiteness criterion: W is finite exactly when the Coxeter form is positive definite
- For an endomorphism in finite dimension, preserving lengths, preserving inner products, carrying orthonormal bases to orthonormal bases, and $T^*T=I$ are equivalent
- For a subspace $W$ of a finite-dimensional inner product space, $V=W\oplus W^\perp$
- Rank-nullity: $\dim_F V=\operatorname{nullity}T+\operatorname{rank}T$
Used by
- A moved-space intersection in A₃ that is not the meet Example
- Simple and reflection lengths of a long transposition in S₅ Example
- The Wall form and line restrictions of a plane rotation, and the necessity of a common upper bound Example
- Root normals inside the moved space, factorizations into reflections, and independent normals Lemma
- The factorization criterion, linear independence of the faces, and the geometric simplicial structure of X(sigma) Lemma
- The mu-dot-root identities, the cone separation, and the canonical simple systems of the subintervals [1, sigma] Lemma
- Carter's reflection-length formula, the absolute order on a finite Coxeter group, and moved-space rigidity under a common upper bound Theorem
- The separating-root lemma, the exact facet halfspaces of the added cones, and the spherical convexity of |X(sigma)| Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Brady and C. Watt, Lattices in finite real reflection groups (arXiv:math/0501502) (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. W. Carter, Conjugacy classes in the Weyl group, Compositio Mathematica 25 (1972) 1-59 (Numdam full text) (standard reference, not scraped)