How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compatibility at time zero for a classical parabolic solution
Statement
Assume Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain) for the cited integral and semigroup suppliers.
Let be the generator of a strongly continuous semigroup on a Banach space (Infinitesimal generator of a C0-semigroup, Banach space), let , , and let be continuous with defined. Suppose satisfies , and for every , and suppose exists in (in particular if ). Then and consequently extends to a classical solution on in the sense of Classical, strong and mild abstract Cauchy solutions exactly when this limit exists, and in the PDE realisation is precisely the boundary-and-domain compatibility of the initial datum. One-order propagation under stronger regularity. If, in addition, , in the graph norm (Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension), and with in the graph norm as , then is right-differentiable at with . No choice principle beyond Dependent Choice is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A strongly continuous semigroup with generator on the Banach space , the closed operator with domain , a continuous with defined, and with , , on and existing in . For the one-order propagation clause, also assume , in graph norm, , and in graph norm.
is closed and densely defined: its graph is closed in (The generator is closed and densely defined).
A classical solution on is a function in with values in , , satisfying the equation on and the initial condition; continuous forcing on extends the equation to the endpoints (Classical, strong and mild abstract Cauchy solutions).
Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension: the graph norm on is , so is bounded.
Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves: if a continuous Banach-valued curve is differentiable on and its derivative extends continuously to , then its increment equals the integral of that derivative.
Proof
Limit of . For the equation gives , and by the hypothesis while by continuity; hence in .
Limit of . By continuity of at and one has as (Fréchet derivative between Banach spaces), and for every .
Closedness forces the endpoint compatibility. The pairs lie in the graph of for and converge to by [step 1.1] and [step 1.2]; since the graph is closed by [L1], the limit lies in the graph: and , that is .
Equivalence with the classical solution. If the limit exists, [step 2.1] shows and, using , the derivative extends continuously to with value . By [L4] applied to on , , so the right derivative at is this limiting value. Hence solves the equation at every point of and is a classical solution by [L2]; conversely a classical solution has , so its one-sided derivative at exists and the limit does.
(One-order propagation under stronger regularity) Assume the additional hypotheses in the final Statement clause and put , for . By [L3], is bounded from the graph-norm domain into ; since is there in graph norm and , differentiating on gives . The graph-norm convergence of and continuity of imply . By [L4] on , ; dividing by and using continuity of the integrand at gives the stated right derivative of at .
Assembly. [step 2.1] proves and the value of the limit; [step 3.1] gives the stated equivalence with the classical solution; [step 3.2] proves the one-order propagation. The argument used only continuity, closedness of the graph and the equation, so no choice principle beyond Dependent Choice was used.
Depends on
- Infinitesimal generator of a C0-semigroup
- Classical, strong and mild abstract Cauchy solutions
- Resolvent and spectrum of a closed operator on a Banach space
- The generator is closed and densely defined
- Fréchet derivative between Banach spaces
- Banach space
- Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension
- Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Klaus-Jochen Engel and Rainer Nagel, One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 194 (complete author-hosted monograph) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2026 author manuscript; complete 392-page archived text) (standard reference, not scraped)