How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transcendental residue elements adjoin across a maximal subfield
Statement
Let be a local ring, let be a residue-injective subfield, and let be transcendental over the residue image . Then there exists a larger residue-injective subfield whose residue image contains .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A local ring , a residue-injective subfield , and a residue element transcendental over .
A coefficient-field argument enlarges a residue-injective subfield by adjoining new residue elements when injectivity is preserved (Maximal residue-injective subfields exist).
The residue image of a subfield is a field inside the residue field (Equicharacteristic local rings and coefficient fields).
Proof
Choose any lift of . For every nonzero polynomial , the residue of is . Since is transcendental over , this residue is nonzero, so and therefore is a unit of .
Hence evaluation at defines an injective homomorphism because every denominator evaluates to a unit by step 1.1. Let be its image. Then is a subfield of , and its residue image contains together with .
If an element of has zero residue, its representing rational function has zero value at the transcendental element , so the rational function is zero. Thus the residue map is injective on . By [L1], this is exactly the desired enlargement step.
Therefore every transcendental residue element adjoins across a maximal residue-injective subfield.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Melvin Hochster, The structure theory of complete local rings (standard reference, not scraped)