How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Common shifts force binary robust risk at least one half
Statement
Let be an integer, let , let satisfy , and let be uniform on and independent of an arbitrary Borel random vector . Set , let be the joint law of , and let be any Borel classifier. For the closed threat and robust zero-one risk defined by outer expectation, .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
The center satisfies .
Robust risk is the infimum of expectations of nonnegative measurable majorants of the pointwise robust loss; the threat includes every with . Measurable threat correspondences and robust risk.
If nonnegative measurable functions satisfy , then . Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral.
Independence of and means their generated sigma-algebras are independent. Independent random elements.
Proof
Since is Borel, the event belongs to , which is independent of by [F3]. Thus .
For each outcome, the perturbation satisfies by [A1], and . Hence the pointwise robust loss is at least . This indicator is measurable because and the coordinate variables are measurable.
Every measurable nonnegative majorant in the definition of robust risk therefore satisfies . By [F2] and step 1.1, its expectation is at least . Taking the infimum over all such majorants gives .
References
Measurable threat correspondences and robust risk: the robust loss is bounded below pointwise by the loss at any one admissible perturbation, and risk uses outer expectation.
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: transfers a pointwise measurable lower bound to every measurable majorant's expectation.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ludwig Schmidt, Shibani Santurkar, Dimitris Tsipras, Kunal Talwar, and Aleksander Madry, Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Data, arXiv:1804.11285v2, Appendix A.2, proof of Theorem 11, PDF pp. 27–30 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Muni Sreenivas Pydi, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning: An Optimal Transport Perspective, Chapter 2 §§2.2–2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)