Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Common shifts force binary robust risk at least one half

Statement

Let d≥1 be an integer, let ϵ≥0, let μ∈Rd satisfy ∥μ∥∞≤ϵ, and let Y be uniform on {−1,+1} and independent of an arbitrary Borel random vector Z∈Rd. Set X=Yμ+Z, let P be the joint law of (X,Y), and let f:Rd→{−1,+1} be any Borel classifier. For the closed ℓ∞ threat Δϵ(x)={x+δ:∥δ∥∞≤ϵ} and robust zero-one risk defined by outer expectation, RP,Δϵrob(f)≥1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

[A1]

The center satisfies ∥μ∥∞≤ϵ.

[F1]

Robust risk is the infimum of expectations of nonnegative measurable majorants of the pointwise robust loss; the ℓ∞ threat includes every x+δ with ∥δ∥∞≤ϵ. Measurable threat correspondences and robust risk.

[F2]

If nonnegative measurable functions g,h satisfy h≤g, then E[h]≤E[g]. Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral.

[F3]

Independence of Y and Z means their generated sigma-algebras are independent. Independent random elements.

Proof

1.1givenF3algebra

Since f is Borel, the event A:={f(Z)=+1} belongs to σ(Z), which is independent of σ(Y) by [F3]. Thus P(f(Z)≠Y)=P(A)P(Y=−1)+P(Ac)P(Y=+1)=12P(A)+12P(Ac)=1/2.

1.2givenA1F1

For each outcome, the perturbation δ=−Yμ satisfies ∥δ∥∞≤ϵ by [A1], and X+δ=Z. Hence the pointwise robust loss is at least 1{f(Z)≠Y}. This indicator is measurable because f and the coordinate variables are measurable.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F1F2∎

Every measurable nonnegative majorant g in the definition of robust risk therefore satisfies g(X,Y)≥1{f(Z)≠Y}. By [F2] and step 1.1, its expectation is at least 1/2. Taking the infimum over all such majorants gives RP,Δϵrob(f)≥1/2.

References

Measurable threat correspondences and robust risk: the robust loss is bounded below pointwise by the loss at any one admissible perturbation, and risk uses outer expectation.

Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: transfers a pointwise measurable lower bound to every measurable majorant's expectation.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources