How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compact distribution convolution preserves schwartz and tempered spaces
Statement
Let have compact support. Then
is continuous and complex-linear. If , define by
After restricting and to , this agrees with the ordinary distribution convolution in which one factor has compact support. All assertions hold in ZF.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compactly supported distribution , a Schwartz function , and a tempered distribution (Tempered distribution).
Compactly supported distributions act continuously on all smooth functions and obey a fixed compact finite-order estimate (Compactly supported distributions extend to smooth functions).
The Schwartz seminorms/topology are those of Schwartz space and its seminorms and Schwartz topology and convergence.
The smooth-parameter clause for compact distribution pairings holds in ZF (Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families).
Distribution convolution with one compactly supported factor is well-defined by the addition-map pairing and is commutative (Convolution of distributions when one has compact support, Convolution of distributions is well defined under the support hypothesis).
Restriction embeds into (Tempered distributions embed continuously in distributions).
Proof
Choose a compact neighborhood of and an order for the estimate in [F1]. Differentiate by [F3] and expand .
Only finitely many terms occur because stays in . [F1, F2, F3, algebra]
The estimates in step 1.1 show that is Schwartz and that is continuous. Replacing by proves the same statement for ; equivalently for the reflected compact distribution .
The displayed candidate for is . By step 2.1 this is a continuous complex-linear functional on , hence tempered.
For , the inner function is precisely the iterated-pairing test used by the addition-map definition in [F4].
with the cutoff interpretation prescribed there. This proves agreement after the embedding [F5]. The cases , , or empty support give zero. Only the ZF smooth-parameter clause of [F3] was used; no integral-interchange clause or choice axiom entered. [F3, F4, F5, step 3.1] ∎
Depends on
- Compactly supported distributions extend to smooth functions
- Schwartz space and its seminorms
- Schwartz topology and convergence
- Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families
- Convolution of distributions is well defined under the support hypothesis
- Tempered distribution
- Tempered distributions embed continuously in distributions
- Convolution of distributions when one has compact support
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Semyon Dyatlov, Lecture notes for 18.155 (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)