Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact distribution convolution preserves schwartz and tempered spaces

Statement

Let vD(Rn) have compact support. Then

Cv:SS,(Cvφ)(x)=(vφ)(x)=vy,φ(xy),

is continuous and complex-linear. If uS, define uvS by

uv,ψ=ux,vy,ψ(x+y).

After restricting u and uv to D, this agrees with the ordinary distribution convolution in which one factor has compact support. All assertions hold in ZF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compactly supported distribution v, a Schwartz function φ, and a tempered distribution u (Tempered distribution).

[F1]

Compactly supported distributions act continuously on all smooth functions and obey a fixed compact finite-order estimate (Compactly supported distributions extend to smooth functions).

[F2]

The Schwartz seminorms/topology are those of Schwartz space and its seminorms and Schwartz topology and convergence.

[F3]

The smooth-parameter clause for compact distribution pairings holds in ZF (Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families).

[F4]

Distribution convolution with one compactly supported factor is well-defined by the addition-map pairing and is commutative (Convolution of distributions when one has compact support, Convolution of distributions is well defined under the support hypothesis).

[F5]

Restriction embeds S into D (Tempered distributions embed continuously in distributions).

Proof

technique · uniform compact-support estimates and transposition
1.1

Choose a compact neighborhood K of suppv and an order m for the estimate in [F1]. Differentiate by [F3] and expand xα=((xy)+y)α.

F1F3algebra

pαβ(Cvφ)Cv,K,α,βmaxγm, δαpδ,β+γ(φ).

Only finitely many terms occur because y stays in K. [F1, F2, F3, algebra]

2.1

The estimates in step 1.1 show that Cvφ is Schwartz and that Cv is continuous. Replacing y by y proves the same statement for Tvψ(x)=vy,ψ(x+y); equivalently Tv=Cvˇ for the reflected compact distribution vˇ.

F2step 1.1
3.1

The displayed candidate for uv is uTv. By step 2.1 this is a continuous complex-linear functional on S, hence tempered.

givenstep 2.1
4.1

For ψD, the inner function Tvψ is precisely the iterated-pairing test used by the addition-map definition in [F4].

F4step 3.1

uv,ψ=ρ(u)v,(x,y)ψ(x+y)

with the cutoff interpretation prescribed there. This proves agreement after the embedding [F5]. The cases u=0, v=0, or empty support give zero. Only the ZF smooth-parameter clause of [F3] was used; no integral-interchange clause or choice axiom entered. [F3, F4, F5, step 3.1] ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources