Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compatible normal disk boundary paths have a unique type-preserving switch

Statement

Let P,Q be two normal disk types in one tetrahedron, subject to quadrilateral compatibility. Thus if both are quadrilaterals they have the same type. Choose two distinct faces f,g met by both types, and cut each normal boundary word at one point of its arc in f and one point of its arc in g. Each boundary is divided into two paths from f to g.

There are two pairings that join one path from P to one from Q at both ends, producing two new closed boundary words. Exactly one pairing gives the original two normal disk boundary types, as an unordered pair, up to cyclic rotation and reversal of the words. The other pairing has a word crossing some tetrahedral edge at least twice and therefore cannot give those two normal types.

The conclusion concerns the finite boundary words and type counts in the original tetrahedron. It does not assert that arbitrary surface intersections already have the geometric regular-position or partial-switching properties.

Statement references

Normal-surface coordinates and the Haken cone — the four triangle and three quadrilateral types.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A tetrahedron with vertices A,B,C,D, compatible types and two distinct common faces.

[F1]

A triangle TA has cyclic edge word (AB,AC,AD). A quadrilateral QAB∣CD has cyclic edge word (AC,AD,BD,BC). Relabeling the vertices gives all seven types. Consecutive edge symbols specify the intervening triangular face. (Normal-surface coordinates and the Haken cone)

[F2]

A normal disk boundary crosses each of its indicated edges once and every other edge zero times. A boundary word containing an edge twice is therefore not any normal triangle or quadrilateral word. (Normal-surface coordinates and the Haken cone)

Proof

1.1givenF1construct

For each disk, the two cut paths partition its cyclic list of edge symbols. To form a new word, follow its chosen f-to-g path and then the reverse of the chosen f-to-g path of the other disk. Once the paths paired in one output have been chosen, the two remaining paths must be paired in the second. Thus there are exactly two pairings. We now check the compatible type cases. The edge sets displayed below also inherit their orders from [F1], so their concatenations determine the indicated cyclic words.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

If the two types are equal, their two path edge sets are the same nonempty complementary sets U,V. Pairing U with V in each output recovers the original word twice. Pairing U with U and V with V repeats every edge in the corresponding nonempty set, so [F2] excludes that pairing. This covers equal triangles and equal quadrilaterals, for every pair of common faces, including the two-edge paths between opposite faces of a quadrilateral boundary.

2.2F1F2step 1.1construct

For distinct triangles, relabel so they are TA,TB. Their common faces are exactly ABC,ABD. The paths of TA have edge sets {AB} and {AC,AD}; those of TB have {AB} and {BC,BD}. Pair the singleton in one disk with the two-edge path of the other. The resulting words are TB and TA. The other pairing repeats AB in one output, so is excluded by [F2].

2.3F1F2step 1.1construct

For a triangle and quadrilateral, relabel them TA,QAB∣CD. If the common faces are ABC,ABD, their common edge AB is avoided by the quadrilateral. The triangle paths have edge sets {AB} and {AC,AD}; the quadrilateral paths have {AC,AD} and {BC,BD}. Pair {AB} with the quadrilateral's {AC,AD}, giving TA. The remaining two paths concatenate in the order (AC,AD,BD,BC), giving the same quadrilateral. The other pairing joins the two copies of {AC,AD} in one output, repeating both edges, and is excluded.

2.4F1F2step 1.1construct

The other common-face pairs are ABC,ACD and ABD,ACD, whose common edges AC,AD are crossed by the quadrilateral. Interchanging C,D identifies these two cases, so consider ABC,ACD. The triangle paths have {AC} and {AB,AD}; the quadrilateral paths have {AC} and {AD,BD,BC}. Pair the singleton {AC} from the triangle with the three-edge path of the quadrilateral, giving the quadrilateral word up to reversal. Pair the two-edge triangle path with the other singleton, giving TA. The other pairing repeats AC, so is excluded. Vertex relabeling covers any other triangle–quadrilateral pair.

3.1givenstep 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 2.4cases∎

The allowed pairs consist of equal types, distinct triangles, and a triangle with a quadrilateral; distinct quadrilateral types were excluded in the hypothesis. Steps 2.1–2.4 cover them all and prove both existence and uniqueness of the type-preserving pairing, with the stated repeated-edge obstruction for its alternative. All lists and relabelings are finite and refer to the original seven types.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources