Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A coarse complex sample-covariance norm bound from real edge bounds

Statement

Let (ξij)i,j≥1 be one infinite iid array of centered complex random variables with E∣ξ11∣2=τ2<∞ and E∣ξ11∣4<∞. For positive integers n, let Nn be positive with n/Nn→c∈(0,∞), and let Xn=(ξij)1≤i≤n, 1≤j≤Nn. Then almost surely lim sup⁡n→∞∥Xn∥opNn≤(σR+σI)(1+c),σR2=E(Re⁡ξ11)2,σI2=E(Im⁡ξ11)2. In particular, when τ2=1, the right side is at most 2(1+c).

Statement references

Yin, Bai, and Krishnaiah, Theorem 3.1, as reconstructed in the current real finite-fourth-moment upper-edge supplier (full paper PDF).

Bai, Miao, and Pan, Section 2, printed pp. 12–16 (full paper PDF).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The common nested complex iid array and its centered finite-fourth-moment entry law.

[F1]

Iid entries are independent and share one common distribution (Identical distribution and IID families).

[F2]

For a real nested iid array with mean zero, variance one and finite fourth moment, lim sup⁡λmax⁡(ZnTZn/n)≤(1+γ)2 almost surely when the number of columns divided by the number of rows tends to γ>0 (Finite-fourth-moment upper bound for the largest sample-covariance eigenvalue).

[F4]

The operator norm is the maximum of ∥Av∥2 over unit vectors in the domain (The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Write κn=Nn/n→1/c, σR2=E(Re⁡ξ11)2, and σI2=E(Im⁡ξ11)2. Centering of ξ11 makes both real coordinates centered, and σR2+σI2=τ2. If σR>0, the matrices Zn=Re⁡Xn/σR are upper-left blocks of one real iid array with mean zero, variance one and finite fourth moment. Applying [F2] with γ=κ=1/c and then [F3] gives lim sup⁡n∥Re⁡Xn∥opNn≤σR1+κκ=σR(1+c)almost surely. If σR=0, the centered real part is zero almost surely, so the same bound holds. The identical argument for the imaginary part gives the bound with σI.

2.1givenF4step 1.1algebra∎

The complex operator norm satisfies ∥Xn∥op=∥Re⁡Xn+iIm⁡Xn∥op≤∥Re⁡Xn∥op+∥Im⁡Xn∥op. Intersecting the two probability-one events from step 1.1 proves the asserted limsup bound. Finally, σR+σI≤2(σR2+σI2)=2τ by Cauchy–Schwarz, giving the unit-variance consequence.

Source notes

The real edge application uses the current local upper-edge proof for the same top-left nested blocks, finite-fourth-moment law, dimension ratio and normalization. The complex-to-real reduction and triangle bound are proved above.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources