How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Composition of homotopy classes is well defined
Statement
If and satisfy and , then Thus composition on homotopy classes may be defined by
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Chain maps and with and .
Equality of classes means that differences are null-homotopic (Homotopy classes of chain maps).
Whiskering preserves chain homotopy (Chain homotopy is compatible with addition and composition).
Null-homotopic maps form a two-sided additive ideal (Null-homotopic maps form a two-sided additive ideal).
Proof
By [L1], the maps and are null-homotopic. Using [L3], is a sum of two null-homotopic maps.
The first summand in step 1.1 is null-homotopic by right whiskering, and the second is null-homotopic by left whiskering; this is exactly [L2] and [L3]. Hence is null-homotopic, so [L1] gives .
Depends on
Used by
- The homotopy category of chain complexes Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 13.8: The homotopy category (standard reference, not scraped)