How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Connected four-valent link projections admit checkerboard colorings
Statement
Let be the finite connected 4-valent graph underlying a regular link projection. Its complementary regions have exactly two colorings with two colors such that regions sharing an edge have different colors.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite connected 4-valent graph embedded in .
Every crossing of a regular link projection is a transverse double point and has four local incident half-edges; there are finitely many crossings (Regular oriented link diagrams).
A smooth embedded circle in the plane has exactly two complementary regions and bounds a closed disk on its bounded side, without a choice assumption. The corresponding separation fact on the projection sphere follows by choosing a point off the circle and using a stereographic chart (Choice-free smooth Jordan disk parameters and prescribed collars).
Proof
Fix a point in a complementary region . First decompose the edges of into finitely many edge-disjoint simple cycles. In a nonempty remaining even-degree graph, follow unused edges until a vertex first repeats; the segment between its two occurrences is a simple cycle, including a loop edge as a one-edge cycle. Removing that cycle subtracts two incident half-edges at each of its vertices and leaves every degree even. Repeat until no edge remains. This terminates because each removal deletes an edge; a vertex-free circle is already one cycle. Now choose two piecewise-smooth paths from to the same point in a region , avoiding the finitely many vertices and meeting open edges transversely in finitely many points. Their concatenation is a closed test path; it need not be embedded or be an edge-path of . Its intersections are counted with traversal multiplicity, so modulo two. For each simple graph cycle, choose small vertex disks disjoint from the compact image of and round that cycle inside them. The rounded cycle remains embedded and has exactly the same test-path intersections as its original edges. By [F2] it separates into two sides. Each transverse encounter switches the side occupied by , and a complete traversal returns to its initial side, even when the test path self-intersects or retraces an arc. Thus meets each rounded cycle evenly. The graph cycles partition all open edges and misses their vertices, so summing their intersection counts proves modulo two. Therefore and have the same crossing parity. Coloring by this parity gives a well-defined function, independent also of the chosen endpoint inside , since two such endpoints are joined within without crossing . All decompositions, rounding choices and perturbations are finite; no choice axiom is used.
Crossing one edge changes the parity by one, so adjacent regions receive different colors. The dual adjacency graph of regions is connected because a generic path between any two regions crosses finitely many edges; hence fixing the color of forces every other color. The two choices for the color of give exactly two colorings.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Danny Calegari, Introduction to Knot Theory, §5.2, printed pp. 44–45 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Louis H. Kauffman, New Invariants in the Theory of Knots, Astérisque 163–164 (1988), §III, pp. 160–163 (standard reference, not scraped)