How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Countable bounded multisets admit injective sum encodings
Statement
Let be a countable set and let . There is a map such that the sum is injective on finite multisets of total multiplicity at most . For every irrational , the map
is injective on pairs with and a finite multiset of total multiplicity at most . For , the only allowed neighbor multiset is empty.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A countable set , a bound , and an irrational real number . Prove both injectivity claims.
Countability means that an injection is given.
Finite multisets as finitely supported multiplicity functions: A finite multiset on is its finitely supported multiplicity function ; its size is the sum of all multiplicities.
Proof
Let and set . If , the only allowed multiset is empty, so its sum encoding is injective. If and two allowed multisets have equal sums, for each let be the multiplicity in minus the multiplicity in of the element with -index , and set when no element has that index. The sequence has finite support and . If some , let be its largest such index. Equality of the sums gives , contradicting . Hence all multiplicities agree and .
Suppose . Rearranging gives , where and are integers. If , then is rational, contrary to the hypothesis. Thus ; since has distinct powers and is injective, is injective and . The equality then reduces to equality of the neighbor sums; step 1.1 gives .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keyulu Xu, Weihua Hu, Jure Leskovec, and Stefanie Jegelka, How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks? (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pan Li and Jure Leskovec, Graph Representation Learning (standard reference, not scraped)