Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cyclic p-fold power construction

Statement

Assume AC and let p be prime. For every q0, every integer j, and every space X, the cyclic construction gives a natural additive operation

Dj:Hq(X;Fp)Hpqj(X;Fp),

with Dj=0 for j<0 or j>(p1)q. Its degree-zero coefficient is D0(x)=xp. On a finite regular cell complex it agrees, under the cellular--singular comparison, with the coefficient of [wj] in the diagonal pullback of the equivariant external pth power.

For odd p, put m=(p1)/2. If q is even, Dj can be nonzero only for j=2r(p1) or 2r(p1)1; if q is odd, it can be nonzero only for j=(2r+1)(p1) or (2r+1)(p1)1, where r0. With the positive mod-p Bockstein used in this library,

βD2r=D2r1,βD2r1=0,

where D1=0. If xHq(X;Fp), then

D(p1)q(x)=aqx,aq=(1)mq(q+1)/2(m!)qFp×.

For p=2 the same formula has aq=1. Finally, for xHr(X;Fp) and yHs(Y;Fp),

D2k(x×y)=(1)p(p1)rs/2a+b=kD2a(x)×D2b(y)(p odd),

and Dk(x×y)=a+b=kDa(x)×Db(y) for p=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the prime p, the standard cyclic resolution W, a degree q class, and the positive Bockstein convention.

[F1]

On finite regular cell complexes the diagonal pullback of the equivariant external power has unique coefficients, and every coefficient operation is additive (Equivariant p-fold external power and diagonal decomposition).

[F2]

The relative equivariant carrier theorem gives existence and homotopy uniqueness, relative to a prescribed subcomplex, for carried extensions (Equivariant p-fold external power and diagonal decomposition).

[F3]

The standard cyclic resolution has one basis class [wj] in each degree; for odd p its coefficient algebra has v=[w1], u=[w2]=βv, [w2r]=ur, and [w2r+1]=urv (Free cyclic resolution, group cohomology, and cochain transfer).

[F4]

Transfer after restriction is multiplication by the subgroup index (Free cyclic resolution, group cohomology, and cochain transfer).

[F5]

A natural mod-p identity that holds on all finite regular complexes holds on every space (Natural singular-cohomology identities are detected on finite regular complexes).

[F6]

Cellular homology agrees with singular homology (Cellular homology computes singular homology).

[F7]

Alexander--Whitney and shuffle are natural augmentation-preserving chain homotopy inverses (Alexander--Whitney and shuffle are natural chain-homotopy inverses).

[F8]

Homotopy equivalences induce singular-homology isomorphisms (Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology).

[F9]

Under AC and the finite-free hypothesis, external product is an additive cohomological Kunneth isomorphism (Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism).

[F10]

The Bockstein construction begins by choosing a cochain lift of a cocycle (Bockstein connecting operation).

[F11]

For the cyclic mod-p sequence, least nonnegative residue representatives give a canonical cochain lift without AC (Bockstein connecting operation).

[F12]

The mod-p Bockstein satisfies the signed cup-product derivation rule (The mod-two Bockstein is a derivation).

[F13]

The Bockstein is natural in maps of spaces (Bocksteins are natural and stable).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice supplies the carrier fillings, the dual cellular--singular comparison, and the finite-detection complement used below.

Proof

Proof technique: construct the equivariant diagonal on universal singular simplices, compare it with the finite cellular construction, and perform the normalizer, transfer, circle, and product calculations coefficient by coefficient.

1.1

Construct an equivariant singular diagonal. [F2, F3, F7, F8, A1] For the identity simplex ιn:ΔnΔn, construct elements Φ(ejιn)C(Δn;Fp)p by induction on j+n. The already defined boundary is a cycle because the cyclic-resolution differential squares to zero. The affine contraction of Δn to its first vertex, [F8], and the iterated chain equivalence [F7] make its augmented pfold tensor complex acyclic, so a filling exists. [A1] selects one filling for each nonempty extension problem. Define the other Cp-translates equivariantly, fix degree zero to be the iterated Alexander--Whitney diagonal, and put

ΦX(ejσ):=(σ#)pΦ(ejιn)

for every singular n-simplex σ. The inductive boundary equation says that ΦX:WC(X)C(X)p is a chain map. The displayed formula makes it strictly natural in X, including when σ is degenerate. The relative carrier comparison in [F2] shows that two systems so constructed are equivariantly chain-homotopic.

2.1

Define the singular coefficients and prove well-definedness. [F2, F3, step 1.1] For a degree-q cocycle c, define

Dj(c)(z):=cpΦX(ejz).

The cyclic rotation fixes cp: for odd p its Koszul exponent is q2(p1), which is even, and for p=2 the sign is 1 in the coefficient field. Evaluating the chain-map equation therefore kills both T1 and N=1++Tp1 and proves that Dj(c) is a cocycle. Evaluating a comparison homotopy proves independence of Φ.

If c=c+δb, the chain map on IC(X) with endpoint values c,c and interval-edge value b gives, after the equivariant interval extension of [F2], a cochain homotopy between the two pfold evaluations. Thus the class depends only on x=[c]. Strict naturality in step 1.1 proves naturality of Dj.

3.1

Prove additivity and identify D0. [F3, F4, F7, step 2.1] For cocycles c,d, the mixed words in (c+d)pcpdp form free Cp-orbits. Taking the lexicographically least word in each finite orbit writes their sum as Tr1Cpz. The explicit contraction of W after forgetting its action, together with [F7], makes restriction from equivariant to ordinary cohomology onto. Hence [F4]'s TrRes=p=0 shows that diagonal pullback kills the mixed class. Uniqueness of the [wj] coordinates gives Dj(x+y)=Dj(x)+Dj(y).

At j=0, the fixed augmentation and the degree-zero diagonal in step 1.1 give the iterated Alexander--Whitney representative for the ordinary cup power. Therefore D0(x)=xp.

3.2

Compare with finite cellular coefficients. [F1, F2, F6, F7, F8, A1, step 1.1, step 2.1] For a finite regular K, barycentric subdivision of each closed cell defines a cell-carried chain map ι:Ccell(K;Fp)Csing(K;Fp). By [F6] it is a homology isomorphism. Its mapping cone is acyclic; [A1] chooses complements to its boundary subspaces, whose inverse boundary maps contract the cone. Dualizing proves that ι is a cohomology isomorphism.

The cellular diagonal from [F1] followed by ιp and the singular diagonal from step 1.1 preceded by 1ι lie in the same closed-cell pfold carrier. Each closed cell is a disk, and [F7], [F8] make that carrier augmented acyclic. The relative comparison in [F2] gives an equivariant chain homotopy between the two maps. Evaluating it on cp proves that every singular Dj corresponds to the finite cellular coefficient stated in [F1].

4.1

Establish the sharp range on finite regular complexes. [F1, step 3.2] Restriction to the q-skeleton is injective on Hq and an isomorphism in lower degrees by the cellular cochain complex. Collapse its (q1)-skeleton and map each q-cell to Sq with the integer degree representing the chosen coefficient of a cellular cocycle. This gives a map KqSq pulling the sphere generator back to the class. Naturality therefore reduces Dj for j>(p1)q to a class in Hpqj(Sq;Fp) below degree q. It is zero except possibly in degree zero. In that last case j=pq and q>0; restriction to a point sends the sphere generator to zero, so additivity sends Dpq to zero, while H0(Sq)H0() is injective. Thus Dj=0 throughout the stated range.

4.2

Apply the normalizer action at odd primes. [F3, F13, step 3.2] For aFp×, multiplication by a permutes the p tensor positions and conjugates T to Ta. Its sign is computed from the Vandermonde product:

sgn(iai)=ap(p1)/2=amin Fp.

On H(BCp;Fp) the induced map sends v=[w1] to av; naturality of the positive Bockstein in [F13] sends u=βv to au. It therefore multiplies [w2r] by ar and [w2r+1] by ar+1. On the coefficient line of a degree-q input, the position permutation acts by amq. Coordinate uniqueness forces rmq(modp1) for j=2r, and r+1mq(modp1) for j=2r+1. Separating even and odd q gives exactly the four families in the Statement.

4.3

Derive the external product formula. [F1, F3, F7, step 1.1, step 3.2] Take the tensor product of the two equivariant power cocycles and pull it back along the diagonal CpCp×Cp. The shuffle moving p degree-s factors past the degree-r factors contributes (1)p(p1)rs/2. The cyclic diagonal in [F3] gives every split with coefficient one when p=2; for odd p, its even coordinate has only the even--even splits, since the odd--odd coefficient p(p1)/2 is zero in Fp. Comparing the unique wk coordinates yields the two displayed external formulas. The carrier comparison in step 1.1 makes this chain calculation valid for arbitrary spaces, not only finite complexes.

4.4

Relate adjacent coefficients by the positive Bockstein. [F3, F4, F10, F11, F12, F13, step 2.1, step 3.1] Lift c by its canonical residues [F11]. Writing δc~=ph, the coboundary of c~p divided by p is the cyclic sum of the p words with one h and p1 copies of c. For odd p this is a transfer, so step 3.1's transfer argument makes the Bockstein of the pulled back total class zero. By [F3] and [F10], our positive convention has βw2r=0 and βw2r1=w2r. Applying the signed derivation rule [F12] to jwj×Dj(x) and comparing even and odd coordinates gives

βD2r+D2r1=0,βD2r1=0.

This explains the minus sign relative to sources using βw2r1=w2r.

4.5

Compute the circle coefficient. [F1, F3, step 3.2] Give S1 two oriented edges J1,J2 with common boundary and let the cocycle z take values 1,0 on them. Steenrod--Epstein's carried map is obtained recursively from the interval contraction. At resolution degree p1=2m, its displayed finite sum has the single surviving multi-index αi=βi=0 and hence

Φ(ep1(J1J2))=m!(J1pJ2p).

Tensor evaluation of zp on J1p contributes the Koszul sign (1)p(p1)/2=(1)m, while it vanishes on J2p. Therefore Dp1(z)=(1)mm!z, so a1=(1)mm!. For p=2 the same two-edge calculation has coefficient one.

5.1

Compute every top coefficient. [F9, step 4.1, step 4.3, step 4.5] For q1, let u be the generator in degree q1 on Sq1 and let z be the circle class. [F9] makes u×z nonzero. The sharp range already proved leaves only the two top factors in step 4.3, so

aq=(1)p(p1)(q1)/2aq1a1=(1)mqm!aq1.

Starting with a0=1 gives aq=(1)mq(q+1)/2(m!)q. None of 1,,m is zero modulo p, so aq is a unit. At p=2 the same recurrence keeps aq=1.

6.1

Pass the finite identities to every space and check boundaries. [F5, A1, step 2.1, step 3.1, step 3.2, step 4.1, step 4.2, step 4.3, step 4.4, step 5.1] For fixed p,q,j, each residual in steps 4.1, 4.2, and 5.1 is a natural map between fixed singular cohomology degrees. It vanishes on finite regular complexes by steps 3.2--5.1, so [F5] makes it vanish on every space. The external and Bockstein formulas were already proved directly on singular cochains.

For the empty space and the zero class every operation is zero. At q=0, D0(a)=ap=a and every positive Dj is outside the sharp range; on a point these are all cases. The indices j=0,(p1)q are included, and all negative or oversized indices are declared zero. Step 4.2 treats both input parities, while step 4.4 treats both adjacent coefficient parities and r=0 via D1=0. Degenerate singular simplices occur explicitly in the universal-simplex formula of step 1.1. Both external factors may be zero or a point, and their finite sums include both endpoints. No biconditional is asserted. AC is used exactly for the universal carrier fillings in step 1.1, the dual comparison in step 3.2, and the detection complement in [F5]; every transfer orbit, multi-index, product sum, and circle calculation is finite. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources