How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cyclic p-fold power construction
Statement
Assume AC and let be prime. For every , every integer , and every space , the cyclic construction gives a natural additive operation
with for or . Its degree-zero coefficient is . On a finite regular cell complex it agrees, under the cellular--singular comparison, with the coefficient of in the diagonal pullback of the equivariant external th power.
For odd , put . If is even, can be nonzero only for or ; if is odd, it can be nonzero only for or , where . With the positive mod- Bockstein used in this library,
where . If , then
For the same formula has . Finally, for and ,
and for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the prime , the standard cyclic resolution , a degree class, and the positive Bockstein convention.
On finite regular cell complexes the diagonal pullback of the equivariant external power has unique coefficients, and every coefficient operation is additive (Equivariant p-fold external power and diagonal decomposition).
The relative equivariant carrier theorem gives existence and homotopy uniqueness, relative to a prescribed subcomplex, for carried extensions (Equivariant p-fold external power and diagonal decomposition).
The standard cyclic resolution has one basis class in each degree; for odd its coefficient algebra has , , , and (Free cyclic resolution, group cohomology, and cochain transfer).
Transfer after restriction is multiplication by the subgroup index (Free cyclic resolution, group cohomology, and cochain transfer).
A natural mod- identity that holds on all finite regular complexes holds on every space (Natural singular-cohomology identities are detected on finite regular complexes).
Cellular homology agrees with singular homology (Cellular homology computes singular homology).
Alexander--Whitney and shuffle are natural augmentation-preserving chain homotopy inverses (Alexander--Whitney and shuffle are natural chain-homotopy inverses).
Homotopy equivalences induce singular-homology isomorphisms (Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology).
Under AC and the finite-free hypothesis, external product is an additive cohomological Kunneth isomorphism (Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism).
The Bockstein construction begins by choosing a cochain lift of a cocycle (Bockstein connecting operation).
For the cyclic mod- sequence, least nonnegative residue representatives give a canonical cochain lift without AC (Bockstein connecting operation).
The mod- Bockstein satisfies the signed cup-product derivation rule (The mod-two Bockstein is a derivation).
The Bockstein is natural in maps of spaces (Bocksteins are natural and stable).
The Axiom of Choice supplies the carrier fillings, the dual cellular--singular comparison, and the finite-detection complement used below.
Proof
Proof technique: construct the equivariant diagonal on universal singular simplices, compare it with the finite cellular construction, and perform the normalizer, transfer, circle, and product calculations coefficient by coefficient.
Construct an equivariant singular diagonal. [F2, F3, F7, F8, A1] For the identity simplex , construct elements by induction on . The already defined boundary is a cycle because the cyclic-resolution differential squares to zero. The affine contraction of to its first vertex, [F8], and the iterated chain equivalence [F7] make its augmented fold tensor complex acyclic, so a filling exists. [A1] selects one filling for each nonempty extension problem. Define the other -translates equivariantly, fix degree zero to be the iterated Alexander--Whitney diagonal, and put
for every singular -simplex . The inductive boundary equation says that is a chain map. The displayed formula makes it strictly natural in , including when is degenerate. The relative carrier comparison in [F2] shows that two systems so constructed are equivariantly chain-homotopic.
Define the singular coefficients and prove well-definedness. [F2, F3, step 1.1] For a degree- cocycle , define
The cyclic rotation fixes : for odd its Koszul exponent is , which is even, and for the sign is in the coefficient field. Evaluating the chain-map equation therefore kills both and and proves that is a cocycle. Evaluating a comparison homotopy proves independence of .
If , the chain map on with endpoint values and interval-edge value gives, after the equivariant interval extension of [F2], a cochain homotopy between the two fold evaluations. Thus the class depends only on . Strict naturality in step 1.1 proves naturality of .
Prove additivity and identify . [F3, F4, F7, step 2.1] For cocycles , the mixed words in form free -orbits. Taking the lexicographically least word in each finite orbit writes their sum as . The explicit contraction of after forgetting its action, together with [F7], makes restriction from equivariant to ordinary cohomology onto. Hence [F4]'s shows that diagonal pullback kills the mixed class. Uniqueness of the coordinates gives .
At , the fixed augmentation and the degree-zero diagonal in step 1.1 give the iterated Alexander--Whitney representative for the ordinary cup power. Therefore .
Compare with finite cellular coefficients. [F1, F2, F6, F7, F8, A1, step 1.1, step 2.1] For a finite regular , barycentric subdivision of each closed cell defines a cell-carried chain map . By [F6] it is a homology isomorphism. Its mapping cone is acyclic; [A1] chooses complements to its boundary subspaces, whose inverse boundary maps contract the cone. Dualizing proves that is a cohomology isomorphism.
The cellular diagonal from [F1] followed by and the singular diagonal from step 1.1 preceded by lie in the same closed-cell fold carrier. Each closed cell is a disk, and [F7], [F8] make that carrier augmented acyclic. The relative comparison in [F2] gives an equivariant chain homotopy between the two maps. Evaluating it on proves that every singular corresponds to the finite cellular coefficient stated in [F1].
Establish the sharp range on finite regular complexes. [F1, step 3.2] Restriction to the -skeleton is injective on and an isomorphism in lower degrees by the cellular cochain complex. Collapse its -skeleton and map each -cell to with the integer degree representing the chosen coefficient of a cellular cocycle. This gives a map pulling the sphere generator back to the class. Naturality therefore reduces for to a class in below degree . It is zero except possibly in degree zero. In that last case and ; restriction to a point sends the sphere generator to zero, so additivity sends to zero, while is injective. Thus throughout the stated range.
Apply the normalizer action at odd primes. [F3, F13, step 3.2] For , multiplication by permutes the tensor positions and conjugates to . Its sign is computed from the Vandermonde product:
On the induced map sends to ; naturality of the positive Bockstein in [F13] sends to . It therefore multiplies by and by . On the coefficient line of a degree- input, the position permutation acts by . Coordinate uniqueness forces for , and for . Separating even and odd gives exactly the four families in the Statement.
Derive the external product formula. [F1, F3, F7, step 1.1, step 3.2] Take the tensor product of the two equivariant power cocycles and pull it back along the diagonal . The shuffle moving degree- factors past the degree- factors contributes . The cyclic diagonal in [F3] gives every split with coefficient one when ; for odd , its even coordinate has only the even--even splits, since the odd--odd coefficient is zero in . Comparing the unique coordinates yields the two displayed external formulas. The carrier comparison in step 1.1 makes this chain calculation valid for arbitrary spaces, not only finite complexes.
Relate adjacent coefficients by the positive Bockstein. [F3, F4, F10, F11, F12, F13, step 2.1, step 3.1] Lift by its canonical residues [F11]. Writing , the coboundary of divided by is the cyclic sum of the words with one and copies of . For odd this is a transfer, so step 3.1's transfer argument makes the Bockstein of the pulled back total class zero. By [F3] and [F10], our positive convention has and . Applying the signed derivation rule [F12] to and comparing even and odd coordinates gives
This explains the minus sign relative to sources using .
Compute the circle coefficient. [F1, F3, step 3.2] Give two oriented edges with common boundary and let the cocycle take values on them. Steenrod--Epstein's carried map is obtained recursively from the interval contraction. At resolution degree , its displayed finite sum has the single surviving multi-index and hence
Tensor evaluation of on contributes the Koszul sign , while it vanishes on . Therefore , so . For the same two-edge calculation has coefficient one.
Compute every top coefficient. [F9, step 4.1, step 4.3, step 4.5] For , let be the generator in degree on and let be the circle class. [F9] makes nonzero. The sharp range already proved leaves only the two top factors in step 4.3, so
Starting with gives . None of is zero modulo , so is a unit. At the same recurrence keeps .
Pass the finite identities to every space and check boundaries. [F5, A1, step 2.1, step 3.1, step 3.2, step 4.1, step 4.2, step 4.3, step 4.4, step 5.1] For fixed , each residual in steps 4.1, 4.2, and 5.1 is a natural map between fixed singular cohomology degrees. It vanishes on finite regular complexes by steps 3.2--5.1, so [F5] makes it vanish on every space. The external and Bockstein formulas were already proved directly on singular cochains.
For the empty space and the zero class every operation is zero. At , and every positive is outside the sharp range; on a point these are all cases. The indices are included, and all negative or oversized indices are declared zero. Step 4.2 treats both input parities, while step 4.4 treats both adjacent coefficient parities and via . Degenerate singular simplices occur explicitly in the universal-simplex formula of step 1.1. Both external factors may be zero or a point, and their finite sums include both endpoints. No biconditional is asserted. AC is used exactly for the universal carrier fillings in step 1.1, the dual comparison in step 3.2, and the detection complement in [F5]; every transfer orbit, multi-index, product sum, and circle calculation is finite. ∎
Depends on
- Free cyclic resolution, group cohomology, and cochain transfer
- Equivariant p-fold external power and diagonal decomposition
- Natural singular-cohomology identities are detected on finite regular complexes
- Cellular homology computes singular homology
- Alexander--Whitney and shuffle are natural chain-homotopy inverses
- Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology
- Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism
- Bockstein connecting operation
- The mod-two Bockstein is a derivation
- Bocksteins are natural and stable
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- N. E. Steenrod and D. B. A. Epstein, Cohomology Operations (standard reference, not scraped)