How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The symmetric DAHA translation restricts to the A1 Macdonald operator
Statement
Let be the fundamental coweight translation in the polynomial representation of The rank-one DAHA polynomial representation. On the symmetric Laurent polynomials , the restriction of is the operator of The symmetric Macdonald difference operator of type A1. Here Weyl-invariant means fixed by the involution induced by the rank-one finite reflection. Every such Laurent polynomial in restricts to a polynomial in . Thus the symmetric rank-one DAHA translations give a commuting family of difference operators on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rank-one DAHA polynomial representation, the symmetric subspace , and the operator .
The rank-one DAHA polynomial representation: on , , , and .
The equal-parameter double-affine Hecke algebra of type A1: satisfies , and is the lift of the fundamental translation.
The rank-one root datum and parameter conventions for DAHA: , and the finite Weyl reflection sends to , so it negates the rank-one exponent.
Proof
Let . Since , the divided-difference term in [F1] vanishes and . Since is symmetric, . Hence .
Write and , where and . By [F4], , so . For , and , giving . Adding the formula from step 1.1 yields exactly [F2], so .
The -Laurent algebra is commutative because it is generated by the single invertible element . By [F5], the finite reflection negates the rank-one translation exponent, so the involution in the Statement replaces by ; this is an action on translation exponents, not conjugation by . If is invariant, then, since has characteristic zero, . This identity needs no linear independence of the powers of . The elements satisfy , , and by multiplication; induction therefore expresses each as a polynomial in . By [F3] and step 2.1, preserves and restricts to . Thus every invariant restricts to a polynomial in , and these restrictions commute.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander A. Kirillov Jr., Lectures on the affine Hecke algebras and Macdonald conjectures (standard reference, not scraped)
- I. G. Macdonald, Affine Hecke algebras and orthogonal polynomials (standard reference, not scraped)