How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under dependent choice, Riesz lemma builds an infinite separated sequence in the unit sphere
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain). Let be a normed space that is not spanned by any finite list, and let . Then there exists a sequence of unit vectors in such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Dependent Choice, a normed space that is not the span of any finite list, and a real with .
Dependent Choice produces an -indexed chain for an entire relation on a nonempty set (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
If a subspace admits an ordered basis of finite length, then it is closed (A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed).
Riesz's lemma gives a unit vector at distance from every proper closed subspace (Riesz lemma).
The span of a subset is the set of its finite linear combinations (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span as the smallest linear subspace containing ).
Proof
Let be the set of all finite lists of unit vectors in such that for all . The set is nonempty because any single unit vector lies in it: choose any nonzero and normalize it.
Define a relation on by when is obtained from by appending one more unit vector with . If , then the finite span is generated by a finite list, so by deleting dependent terms one obtains an ordered basis of finite length for . Since is not the span of any finite list, ; by [L2] it is closed. Now [L3] applies to and produces a unit vector with , so has an -successor. Thus is entire on .
By [L1], there is a sequence in with for every . Because each successor appends exactly one new term, the first entries stabilize: if denotes the last entry appended when passing from to , then every earlier remains in all later lists.
For , the vector was chosen with , and lies in that span. Hence . Every is a unit vector by the definition of . Therefore is the required separated sequence.
Remarks
- This lemma is the optional DC witness from the design. The compactness results on the page do not need it.
Depends on
- Riesz lemma
- A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Linear combination of a finite list, and the span $\operatorname{span}(S)$ as the smallest linear subspace containing $S$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Paul Howard and Eleftherios Tachtsis, On infinite-dimensional Banach spaces and weak forms of the axiom of choice (standard reference, not scraped)