How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive-degree exact free complexes split over a depth-zero local ring
Statement
Let be a Noetherian local ring with a nonzero annihilated by (equivalently, has depth zero). Let be a finite free complex exact in every positive degree. Then it is isomorphic to a direct sum of contractible two-term identity complexes and a free module concentrated in degree zero. In particular, with , each differential has rank and its ideal of -minors is the unit ideal (with the usual -minor convention).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The depth-zero local ring, nonzero socle element, and positively exact finite free complex.
A unit matrix entry in a differential splits off a contractible two-term identity pair, reducing the total number of positive-degree basis vectors (A unit differential entry splits a contractible two-term summand).
Proof
If for every , the complex is just in degree zero and the decomposition holds. Otherwise let be the highest index with . Positive-degree exactness makes injective. If every matrix coefficient of lay in , take a basis vector . The nonzero vector would map to zero, since , contradicting injectivity. Thus has a unit matrix entry.
By [F1], split off one contractible identity pair. The remaining complex is still positively exact because the split pair has zero homology. Its sum of ranks in positive degrees is strictly smaller. Repeating the argument of step 1.1 therefore stops after finitely many splits and leaves only a free degree-zero term. This is the asserted decomposition.
In the decomposition, let be the number of identity pairs whose nonzero differential has degree . Then for , with . Descending from gives . The map is identity on and zero on the complementary summand, so its largest nonzero minor size is , and an -minor is . No choice principle beyond finite bases is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Algebra, Lemma 10.102.3 (tag 00MY), depth-zero splitting (standard reference, not scraped)