Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure

Statement

Let f:X→Y be a continuous map.

  1. If F is a sheaf on X, then f∗F is a sheaf on Y.
  2. If F is a sheaf of groups, rings, or modules on X, then f∗F is a sheaf of the same kind on Y.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous map f:X→Y.

[F1]

The direct image is defined by (f∗F)(V)=F(f−1(V)) (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map).

[L1]

A sheaf is exactly a presheaf whose compatible local sections glue uniquely on every open cover (A sheaf on a topological space).

[L2]

A sheaf of groups, rings, or modules is a set-valued sheaf together with objectwise algebraic operations preserved by restriction (Presheaves and sheaves of groups, rings, and modules).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1givenconstruct

Let F be a sheaf on X, let V=⋃iVi be an open cover in Y, and let si∈(f∗F)(Vi)=F(f−1(Vi)) be compatible on overlaps. By [F1], the sets f−1(Vi) cover f−1(V), so [L1] gives a unique section s∈F(f−1(V)) restricting to every si. This section is exactly an element of (f∗F)(V), so f∗F is a sheaf.

2.1F1L2step 1.1

If F is a sheaf of groups, rings, or modules, then each section set of f∗F is literally the corresponding section set of F over a preimage open set. Hence the algebraic operations are inherited objectwise, and the restriction maps are the same homomorphisms as before. By [L2] and step 1.1, f∗F is a sheaf of the same kind.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove both assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources