How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distinct normal Sylow subgroups centralize one another
Statement
Normal Sylow subgroups for distinct primes centralize one another. See Sylow -subgroups of a finite group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
Let be a finite group, let be prime, and write with and . A subgroup is a Sylow -subgroup when . Equivalently, its order is the largest power of dividing . This is a property of a subgroup and does not presume that such a subgroup exists; existence is proved in thm-sylow-first-theorem. (Sylow -subgroups of a finite group).
For subgroups , their subgroup commutator is where (def-commutator-and-commutator-subgroup, def-generated-subgroup). The lower central series is Each is characteristic in , and the series descends because whenever . (Subgroup commutators and the lower central series).
Let be a group and let be a subgroup (def-subgroup). For , write The subgroup is normal in when In that case write . Equivalently, every inner conjugation of maps onto itself. The connection with equality of the left and right cosets of def-coset is proved in thm-normal-subgroup-characterisations. (Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation).
Let be a finite group and . Then Consequently, under the canonical embedding , divides . (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
Proof
For normal Sylow - and -subgroups with , every commutator lies in their intersection.
Lagrange makes that intersection trivial because its order divides coprime prime powers. This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 73 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Consequences of the Sylow Theorems, Sections 1-5 (standard reference, not scraped)