How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every nontrivial finite -group has a normal subgroup of index
Statement
Every nontrivial finite -group has a normal subgroup of index . See Every finite -group is nilpotent.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
Every finite -group is nilpotent. The trivial group is included and has nilpotency class zero. (Every finite -group is nilpotent).
Every maximal proper subgroup of a finite nilpotent group is normal and has prime index. (Maximal subgroups of finite nilpotent groups are normal of prime index).
Let be a finite group and . Then Consequently, under the canonical embedding , divides . (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
Proof
In the finite nonempty collection of proper subgroups choose one maximal by inclusion.
The nilpotent maximal-subgroup theorem makes its index prime, while Lagrange makes that index divide a power of , so it is .
The maximal-subgroup theorem also makes normal, so is the required normal subgroup of index . This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, The Sylow Theorems, Sections 1-2 (standard reference, not scraped)