How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every finite -group is nilpotent
Statement
Every finite -group is nilpotent. The trivial group is included and has nilpotency class zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime and a finite group of order for some .
is the inverse image of under the quotient map (The upper central series).
is nilpotent if for some ; the trivial group has class zero (Nilpotent groups and nilpotency class).
Every nontrivial finite -group has nontrivial center (Every nontrivial finite -group has nontrivial center, in fact divides ).
For , in the finite case (If is finite then ; for finite this equals , Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
Subgroups of correspond to subgroups of containing (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of correspond to subgroups of containing , with normality preserved).
Proof
If , then , so is nilpotent of class zero by [F2].
Assume and that every -group of order smaller than is nilpotent.
By [L1], is nontrivial. Its order is a positive power with , and [L2] gives .
By induction, is nilpotent, so its upper central series reaches the whole quotient at some term .
Starting with , [F1] shows inductively that the inverse image in of is . Since the quotient series reaches at , one has .
Thus is nilpotent by [F2], completing the induction.
Depends on
- The upper central series
- Nilpotent groups and nilpotency class
- Every nontrivial finite $p$-group has nontrivial center, in fact $p$ divides $|Z(P)|$
- Lagrange's theorem: $|G|=[G:H]|H|$ for every subgroup $H$ of a finite group $G$
- If $[G:N]$ is finite then $|G/N|=[G:N]$; for finite $G$ this equals $|G|/|N|$
- Correspondence theorem: subgroups of $G/N$ correspond to subgroups of $G$ containing $N$, with normality preserved
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 89 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Chapter 6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, Subgroup Series I (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Igusa, Notes on Jordan-Hölder, section 5 (standard reference, not scraped)