How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite group is nilpotent if and only if all Sylow subgroups are normal, if and only if it is their internal direct product
Statement
For a finite group , the following are equivalent: is nilpotent; every Sylow subgroup is normal; and is the internal direct product of its Sylow subgroups. See Every proper subgroup of a finite nilpotent group is properly contained in its normalizer.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
Every proper subgroup of a finite nilpotent group is properly contained in its normalizer. (Every proper subgroup of a finite nilpotent group is properly contained in its normalizer).
Let be a Sylow -subgroup of a finite group . If , then . In particular, . (A subgroup containing the normalizer of a Sylow subgroup is self-normalizing).
Let be finite, let be prime, and write with . Then has a subgroup of order , hence a Sylow -subgroup (def-sylow-p-subgroup). (Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow -subgroup).
Normal Sylow subgroups for distinct primes centralize one another. (Distinct normal Sylow subgroups centralize one another).
Let . The following are equivalent: the form an internal direct product of ; every has a unique expression with ; and the multiplication map is an isomorphism. These statements include the empty family and the one-factor case. (Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation).
Every subgroup and every quotient of a nilpotent group is nilpotent. Every finite direct product of nilpotent groups is nilpotent; the class of a subgroup or quotient is at most the class of the original group, and the class of a nonempty finite product is at most the maximum of the factor classes. The empty product is the trivial group of class zero. (Subgroups, quotients, and finite direct products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent).
Every finite -group is nilpotent. The trivial group is included and has nilpotency class zero. (Every finite -group is nilpotent).
Proof
If is nilpotent and is Sylow, self-normalization of contradicts the normalizer condition unless .
Normal Sylow subgroups for distinct primes commute and have trivial intersections; their product has order , so it is the internal direct product.
Conversely each factor is a finite -group and hence nilpotent, and a finite direct product of nilpotent groups is nilpotent.
The two degenerate cases are admitted by [L5] and hold. For the family of Sylow subgroups is empty, the empty internal direct product is the trivial group, and is nilpotent of class zero by [L7]. If is a power of a single prime, the family has one member, namely itself, the one-factor internal direct product is , and [L7] again makes nilpotent. This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
- Every proper subgroup of a finite nilpotent group is properly contained in its normalizer
- A subgroup containing the normalizer of a Sylow subgroup is self-normalizing
- Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow $p$-subgroup
- Distinct normal Sylow subgroups centralize one another
- Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation
- Subgroups, quotients, and finite direct products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent
- Every finite $p$-group is nilpotent
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 83 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Consequences of the Sylow Theorems, Sections 1-5 (standard reference, not scraped)