Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-sonnet-5)audited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow p-subgroup

Statement

Let G be finite, let p be prime, and write ∣G∣=pam with p∤m. Then G has a subgroup of order pa, hence a Sylow p-subgroup (Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group). See Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.

[L1]

Let G be a finite group, let p be prime, and write ∣G∣=pam with a∈N and p∤m. A subgroup P≤G is a Sylow p-subgroup when ∣P∣=pa. Equivalently, its order is the largest power of p dividing ∣G∣. This is a property of a subgroup and does not presume that such a subgroup exists; existence is proved in thm-sylow-first-theorem. (Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group).

[L2]

Let p be prime and let a,m∈N satisfy p∤m. Then vp ⁣((pampa))=0. The valuation is applied only to nonzero integers. (If ∣G∣=pam with p∤m, then vp(pampa)=0).

[L3]

Let G act on X and let x∈X. The rule Φ:G/Gx⟶G⋅x,Φ(gGx)=g⋅x, is well-defined and bijective. Thus every orbit is naturally in bijection with the left cosets of its stabilizer. (Orbit-stabiliser: G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a well-defined bijection).

[L4]

For an action of G on X and x∈X, ∣G⋅x∣=[G:Gx] whenever either side is finite. In particular, if G is finite, then ∣G∣=∣Gx∣ ∣G⋅x∣.. (Orbit-stabiliser cardinality: ∣G⋅x∣=[G:Gx] whenever either side is finite, and ∣G∣=∣Gx∣ ∣G⋅x∣ for finite G).

[L5]

Let G be a finite group and H≤G. Then ∣G∣=[G:H] ∣H∣. Consequently, under the canonical embedding ι:N→Z, ∣H∣ divides ∣G∣. (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[L6]

Let P be a property of naturals such that for every n∈N, if P(m) holds for all m<n then P(n). Then P(n) holds for all n∈N. (At n=0 the hypothesis is vacuous, so P(0) is forced.). (Strong (complete) induction).

[L7]

For a left action of G on X, the relation x∼y defined by y=g⋅x for some g∈G is an equivalence relation whose class at x is G⋅x, and the distinct orbits partition X (The orbits of a group action are the equivalence classes of x∼y iff y=g⋅x for some g, and hence partition the acted-on set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2L6givenalgebra

Argue by strong induction [L6] on ∣G∣, the induction statement being that every finite group of order n has a subgroup of order pa whenever n=pam with p∤m. Let Ω be the set of subsets of G of size pa and let G act on Ω by left translation, g⋅A:=gA; this is an action, and ∣gA∣=∣A∣ because left translation is a bijection of G. Counting subsets gives ∣Ω∣=(pampa), so [L2] yields vp(∣Ω∣)=0, that is p∤∣Ω∣.

2.1step 1.1L3L4L7choose

By [L7] the orbits partition Ω, so ∣Ω∣ is the sum of the orbit sizes. Were p to divide every orbit size it would divide ∣Ω∣, so some orbit O has p∤∣O∣. Choose A∈O and put H=GA={g∈G:gA=A}. The bijection of [L3] between G/H and O gives ∣O∣=[G:H], so [L4] gives pam=∣G∣=∣H∣ ∣O∣; since p∤∣O∣, the full power pa divides ∣H∣.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra

Suppose H=G. Then gA=A for every g∈G, so for any x∈A the set A contains Gx=G, whence A=G and pa=∣A∣=∣G∣=pam. Thus m=1 and G itself is a subgroup of order pa.

3.2step 2.1L5L6givenalgebra

Suppose instead H≠G, so ∣H∣<∣G∣. By [L5], ∣H∣ divides pam; writing ∣H∣=pbm′ with p∤m′, step 2.1 gives b≥a, while pb∣pam with p∤m gives b≤a. Hence ∣H∣=pam′ with p∤m′, and the induction hypothesis applied to H supplies a subgroup of H of order pa, which is a subgroup of G.

4.1L1step 3.1step 3.2given∎

Steps 3.1 and 3.2 are exhaustive, so G has a subgroup P of order pa, and ∣P∣ is the largest power of p dividing ∣G∣, so P is a Sylow p-subgroup by [L1]. At a=0 the argument returns the trivial subgroup, of order p0=1; for the trivial group ∣G∣=1 this is G itself, and m=1 is the case settled in step 3.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources