How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sylow data for finite groups of order at most
Example
For finite groups of positive order at most , the Sylow subgroup orders and possible counts are as follows. An entry gives the Sylow order and the permitted values of its count.
The order- entry also uses the order- classification; no classification at orders or is asserted. See Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow -subgroup.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
Let be finite, let be prime, and write with . Then has a subgroup of order , hence a Sylow -subgroup (def-sylow-p-subgroup). (Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow -subgroup).
Let with . Then the number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies . (Sylow III: and when with ).
A Sylow -subgroup of a finite group is normal if and only if it is the unique Sylow -subgroup. (A Sylow -subgroup is normal if and only if it is unique).
Let be primes. - If , every group of order is cyclic. - If , there are exactly two isomorphism classes of groups of order : the cyclic group and one nonabelian semidirect product . (Classification of groups of order for primes ).
Every finite -group is nilpotent. The trivial group is included and has nilpotency class zero. (Every finite -group is nilpotent).
Verification
Factoring each order and applying together with gives every entry through order , including the two independent possibilities displayed at order .
At order , Sylow III forces , while the order- classification makes the group cyclic and hence also gives . The entries at orders and record only Sylow data, not isomorphism types.
At order no prime divides the group order, so there is no Sylow subgroup to list. This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 127 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Consequences of the Sylow Theorems, Sections 1-5 (standard reference, not scraped)