How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sylow's Theorems, -Groups and Nilpotent Groups — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Conjugacy in Sₙ, Generation, and the Simplicity of Aₙ
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Semidirect Products, Automorphism Groups and Split Extensions
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The Sylow subgroups of
Example
The group has three Sylow -subgroups, each of order , and four Sylow -subgroups, each generated by a pair of inverse -cycles. See The number of Sylow -subgroups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
For a finite group and a prime , let be the set of Sylow -subgroups (def-sylow-p-subgroup). Define This cardinal is defined even before existence is proved because is a subset of the finite power set of ; thm-sylow-first-theorem later shows it is nonzero. (The number of Sylow -subgroups).
Let with . Then the number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies . (Sylow III: and when with ).
Let , so that (def-natural-numbers). The symmetric group on letters is the group of all bijections of under composition (def-symmetric-group), with the composition convention. (The finite symmetric group , one-line notation, and cycle notation).
For , there is a with if and only if and have the same cycle type, including their numbers of fixed points. (Two elements of are conjugate if and only if they have the same cycle type).
Verification
Relabel the underlying set as . Each of its three partitions into two unordered pairs has a stabilizer of order : one may swap within either pair and may swap the two pairs. These three distinct stabilizers are therefore Sylow -subgroups.
A subgroup of order is generated by a -cycle. Choosing its unique fixed point gives four subgroups, because the two cycles on the remaining three letters are inverse generators of the same subgroup. Thus and , consistent with , , , and . This proves the stated claim.
The Sylow subgroups of
Example
The group has five Sylow -subgroups, ten Sylow -subgroups, and six Sylow -subgroups. See The number of Sylow -subgroups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
For a finite group and a prime , let be the set of Sylow -subgroups (def-sylow-p-subgroup). Define This cardinal is defined even before existence is proved because is a subset of the finite power set of ; thm-sylow-first-theorem later shows it is nonzero. (The number of Sylow -subgroups).
Let with . Then the number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies . (Sylow III: and when with ).
For , the alternating group is the kernel of the sign homomorphism, Thus consists exactly of the even permutations. The subgroup and normality assertions implicit in the word “group” follow from thm-image-subgroup-and-kernel-normal. (The alternating group of even permutations).
The conjugacy classes of are in bijection with the tuples of nonnegative integers satisfying For , the unique empty tuple indexes the identity class of . (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with ).
Verification
There are three-cycles, and each order- subgroup has two nonidentity elements, giving . There are five-cycles, and each order- subgroup has four nonidentity elements, giving .
Each of the five choices of a fixed letter gives the Klein four group of the three double transpositions on the remaining letters. The resulting five groups partition the fifteen double transpositions, so . The values satisfy , , and the respective congruences modulo , , and . This proves the stated claim.
Sylow subgroups of : and
Example
In , the translation subgroup is the unique Sylow -subgroup and the five point stabilizers are the Sylow -subgroups. Thus and . See Sylow III: and when with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
Let with . Then the number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies . (Sylow III: and when with ).
A Sylow -subgroup of a finite group is normal if and only if it is the unique Sylow -subgroup. (A Sylow -subgroup is normal if and only if it is unique).
Let and be groups (def-group), and let be an action by automorphisms (def-action-by-automorphisms). The external semidirect product is the set with multiplication. ( The external semidirect product ).
For every prime , the operations of addition and multiplication on make it a field (def-field). (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field).
Verification
Composition identifies the affine maps , with and , with . The multiplier map has the translation subgroup as its kernel, so that normal subgroup has order and is the unique Sylow -subgroup.
For each , the stabilizer of consists of the four maps . It has order , the full -part of the group order , and hence is Sylow.
The five point stabilizers are distinct, and Sylow III permits at most five Sylow -subgroups. Consequently they are all of them, so and . This proves the stated claim.
The unique Sylow -subgroup of
Example
For every prime , the affine group of has a unique Sylow -subgroup, consisting of the maps with . It has order , including when . See Sylow III: and when with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
Let with . Then the number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies . (Sylow III: and when with ).
A Sylow -subgroup of a finite group is normal if and only if it is the unique Sylow -subgroup. (A Sylow -subgroup is normal if and only if it is unique).
Let and be groups (def-group), and let be an action by automorphisms (def-action-by-automorphisms). The external semidirect product is the set with multiplication. ( The external semidirect product ).
For every prime and natural , Equivalently, among the standard classes modulo , the nonunits are exactly those whose standard representatives are divisible by . (For a prime and , ).
Let and . Then is a unit of (def-unit-group-modulo-n-and-euler-totient) if and only if that is, if and only if and are coprime (def-coprime). Consequently the condition depends only on the class . (For , is a unit if and only if ).
Verification
The affine group is and has order . Reduction of the multiplier modulo is a homomorphism to .
Its kernel consists of arbitrary translations and the units with . It is therefore normal of order , the full -part of the affine-group order, and so is the unique Sylow -subgroup.
For , both units modulo are congruent to modulo , so the kernel is the whole affine group of order ; the same conclusion holds without exception. This proves the stated claim.
The finite Heisenberg group is the unique Sylow -subgroup of its coordinate upper-triangular group
Example
Let with , and let act by diagonal coordinate scaling. In the coordinate upper-triangular group , the subgroup is the unique Sylow -subgroup. See The external direct product with componentwise multiplication.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
Let and be groups. Their external direct product has underlying set and componentwise operation The fact that this operation makes a group, with the indicated identity and inverses, is proved in thm-external-direct-product-is-a-group. Until that result is used, this definition introduces only the set and its componentwise binary operation. (The external direct product with componentwise multiplication).
For groups and , the componentwise operation of def-external-direct-product-of-groups makes a group. Its identity is , and Moreover the coordinate maps and are group homomorphisms. ( is a group with identity , coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections).
An action of a group on a group by automorphisms is a homomorphism Here automorphisms are those of def-group-isomorphism-and-automorphism. Writing , this means that every is an automorphism of , , and . Equivalently, by thm-group-actions-correspond-to-homomorphisms, it is a group action (def-group-action) on the underlying set of for which every acting permutation is an automorphism. (An action of a group on a group by automorphisms).
For an action , the external semidirect product is with multiplication ( The external semidirect product ).
Let be an action by automorphisms. The multiplication makes a group with identity and inverse . ( The semidirect-product multiplication makes a group).
In , the canonical copies and are subgroups, is normal, their intersection is trivial, every element has a unique factorization , and (The canonical copy of is normal, the canonical copy of is a complement, and conjugation induces the action).
A Sylow -subgroup of a finite group is normal if and only if it is the unique Sylow -subgroup. (A Sylow -subgroup is normal if and only if it is unique).
For every prime , the operations of addition and multiplication on make it a field (def-field). (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field).
Let be a positive integer. Every class in (def-integers-modulo-n) contains exactly one integer with . Consequently the map is a bijection from the von Neumann natural to , and . This includes , where the only representative is . For , the map is a bijection . (For , every class in has one representative with , so ; while is in bijection with ).
For , the unit group is and Euler's totient is . (The unit group and Euler's totient for ).
Euler's totient satisfies . If is prime (def-prime), then . (, and for every prime ).
- If and are finite then is finite and (def-finite-cardinality). 2. Let and let be finite sets. Write Then is finite and , the right-hand product being the -valued one of def-nat-finite-sum-and-product. (The product rule: , and ).
Verification
In , expanding both triple products gives the same third coordinate ; hence the operation is associative, with identity and inverse .
For , the scaling factors on are , , and . This identity preserves the cross term , so the scaling is an automorphism, and coordinate multiplication makes a homomorphism.
The semidirect product is therefore defined, and its canonical copy of is normal.
Since and , has the full -part of ; normality makes it the unique Sylow -subgroup. For , is trivial and . This proves the stated claim.
Sylow -subgroups of :
Example
For , the Sylow -subgroups of have order and number . Distinct ones meet trivially, and their union contains exactly nonidentity elements. See For prime , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
For every prime , . (For prime , ).
Let be a finite group, let be prime, and write with and . A subgroup is a Sylow -subgroup when . Equivalently, its order is the largest power of dividing . This is a property of a subgroup and does not presume that such a subgroup exists; existence is proved in thm-sylow-first-theorem. (Sylow -subgroups of a finite group).
For a finite group and a prime , let be the set of Sylow -subgroups (def-sylow-p-subgroup). Define This cardinal is defined even before existence is proved because is a subset of the finite power set of ; thm-sylow-first-theorem later shows it is nonzero. (The number of Sylow -subgroups).
If is a Sylow -subgroup of a finite group , then . (Sylow III*: ).
For every prime , the operations of addition and multiplication on make it a field (def-field). (For every prime , the two operations on make it a field).
Let be a finite group and . Then Consequently, under the canonical embedding , divides . (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
Verification
For , the maps satisfy , so has order . Because , it is a Sylow -subgroup.
The common fixed subgroup of is , since for every exactly when . A normalizer preserves ; conversely, a coordinate automorphism preserving conjugates each to another element of .
Such an automorphism has the form with , giving choices. The normalizer-index formula therefore gives .
Two distinct order- subgroups meet trivially, so their nonidentity elements are disjoint and number . At , the normalizer has order in a group of order , giving three Sylow subgroups and three nonidentity elements. This proves the stated claim.
Sylow data for finite groups of order at most
Example
For finite groups of positive order at most , the Sylow subgroup orders and possible counts are as follows. An entry gives the Sylow order and the permitted values of its count.
The order- entry also uses the order- classification; no classification at orders or is asserted. See Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow -subgroup.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
Let be finite, let be prime, and write with . Then has a subgroup of order , hence a Sylow -subgroup (def-sylow-p-subgroup). (Sylow I: every finite group has a Sylow -subgroup).
Let with . Then the number of Sylow -subgroups satisfies . (Sylow III: and when with ).
A Sylow -subgroup of a finite group is normal if and only if it is the unique Sylow -subgroup. (A Sylow -subgroup is normal if and only if it is unique).
Let be primes. - If , every group of order is cyclic. - If , there are exactly two isomorphism classes of groups of order : the cyclic group and one nonabelian semidirect product . (Classification of groups of order for primes ).
Every finite -group is nilpotent. The trivial group is included and has nilpotency class zero. (Every finite -group is nilpotent).
Verification
Factoring each order and applying together with gives every entry through order , including the two independent possibilities displayed at order .
At order , Sylow III forces , while the order- classification makes the group cyclic and hence also gives . The entries at orders and record only Sylow data, not isomorphism types.
At order no prime divides the group order, so there is no Sylow subgroup to list. This proves the stated claim.
The four isomorphism types of groups of order
Example
Up to isomorphism, the groups of order are the four semidirect products in which the involution acts trivially, by inversion on both prime factors, by inversion on only, or by inversion on only. See Every group of order has normal Sylow - and -subgroups and is not simple.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
Every group of order has normal Sylow - and -subgroups and is not simple. (Every group of order has normal Sylow - and -subgroups and is not simple).
Let be primes. - If , every group of order is cyclic. - If , there are exactly two isomorphism classes of groups of order : the cyclic group and one nonabelian semidirect product . (Classification of groups of order for primes ).
Let be actions. If and satisfy then . (Actions changed by automorphisms of the kernel and complement give isomorphic semidirect products).
Let and be groups (def-group), and let be an action by automorphisms (def-action-by-automorphisms). The external semidirect product is the set with multiplication. ( The external semidirect product ).
Verification
The normal Sylow - and -subgroups commute and form a cyclic normal subgroup . A Sylow -subgroup meets trivially and , so .
Under , an involutory automorphism acts independently on the prime factors. Each factor admits either the trivial action or inversion, giving the four actions stated in the Example.
The corresponding centers have orders , , , and , respectively, so the groups are pairwise nonisomorphic. Every group of order arose in step 1.1, proving exhaustiveness. This proves the stated claim.
is not nilpotent
Example
The group has a normal Klein four Sylow -subgroup and four nonnormal Sylow -subgroups. Consequently is not nilpotent. See Sylow and maximal-subgroup characterizations of finite nilpotence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
For a finite group , the following are equivalent: is nilpotent; every Sylow subgroup is normal; is the internal direct product of its Sylow subgroups; and every maximal subgroup of is normal. (Sylow and maximal-subgroup characterizations of finite nilpotence).
For , the alternating group is the kernel of the sign homomorphism, Thus consists exactly of the even permutations. The subgroup and normality assertions implicit in the word “group” follow from thm-image-subgroup-and-kernel-normal. (The alternating group of even permutations).
A Sylow -subgroup of a finite group is normal if and only if it is the unique Sylow -subgroup. (A Sylow -subgroup is normal if and only if it is unique).
Verification
The eight -cycles in occur in four inverse pairs, so they generate four distinct subgroups of order . These are all the Sylow -subgroups.
Since there is more than one Sylow -subgroup, none is normal and the Sylow characterization rules out nilpotence. By contrast, the identity together with the three double transpositions is a conjugation-invariant Klein four group, hence the normal Sylow -subgroup. This proves the stated claim.
The Fitting and Frattini subgroups of
Example
For , one has , , , and . Hence . See The Fitting subgroup of a finite group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
For a finite group , the Fitting subgroup is the product of its -cores (def-p-core-of-a-finite-group). The factors are normal, so their finite product is a normal subgroup and does not depend on the order of multiplication. For the trivial group the product is empty and equals . (The Fitting subgroup of a finite group).
For a finite group , the Frattini subgroup is If , the family is empty and its intersection inside is itself. Thus . (The Frattini subgroup as the intersection of the maximal subgroups of a finite group).
For every finite group , is nilpotent and normal, and every normal nilpotent subgroup of is contained in . (The Fitting subgroup is nilpotent and is the largest normal nilpotent subgroup of a finite group).
Let , so that (def-natural-numbers). The symmetric group on letters is the group of all bijections of under composition (def-symmetric-group), with the composition convention. (The finite symmetric group , one-line notation, and cycle notation).
Verification
The subgroup is the unique Sylow -subgroup, so . The three order- subgroups are conjugate, so no nontrivial -subgroup is normal and . Therefore .
The maximal subgroups are and the three order- subgroups, whose intersection is ; hence . The quotient identity reduces to and is therefore satisfied. This proves the stated claim.
The -cores, Fitting subgroup, and Frattini subgroup of
Example
For , one has , for every odd prime , , and . Hence . See The -core as the largest normal -subgroup.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
For a finite group and a prime , the -core is the subgroup generated by all normal -subgroups of . There are finitely many such subgroups, their product is normal, and repeated use of shows that the product is again a -group. It contains every normal -subgroup, so it is the unique largest normal -subgroup. (The -core as the largest normal -subgroup).
For a finite group , the Fitting subgroup is the product of its -cores (def-p-core-of-a-finite-group). The factors are normal, so their finite product is a normal subgroup and does not depend on the order of multiplication. For the trivial group the product is empty and equals . (The Fitting subgroup of a finite group).
For a finite group , the Frattini subgroup is If , the family is empty and its intersection inside is itself. Thus . (The Frattini subgroup as the intersection of the maximal subgroups of a finite group).
For every finite group , . ( for every finite group).
Let , so that (def-natural-numbers). The symmetric group on letters is the group of all bijections of under composition (def-symmetric-group), with the composition convention. (The finite symmetric group , one-line notation, and cycle notation).
Verification
The identity and the three double transpositions form a normal Klein four group . Since the three Sylow -subgroups are not normal, no normal -subgroup can properly contain , so . The four Sylow -subgroups are nonnormal, and no other odd prime divides , so every odd -core is trivial and .
The four point stabilizers are maximal subgroups isomorphic to , and their intersection fixes every point and is therefore . Thus the intersection of all maximal subgroups is . Again the quotient formula reduces to the identity . This proves the stated claim.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.