How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
The symmetric group acts on its finite underlying set, and the orbit-partition theorem applies to the cyclic subgroup generated by a permutation. Finite cardinality and the count of bijections supply the size of , while kernels of group homomorphisms supply normal subgroups. These results make cycle structure and parity available without introducing polynomial machinery.
The development first fixes itself together with the one-line and cycle notations that name its elements, and the composition convention they are read under. Support and cycle type then lead to the unique disjoint-cycle decomposition, the order formula, and generation by transpositions. Inversion number then defines sign; the transposition lemma proves factorisation parity is well defined and makes sign a homomorphism. The cycle-sign formula identifies even permutations, after which the alternating group is defined as the sign kernel and its normality, cardinality, and homomorphism characterisation follow.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The finite symmetric group , one-line notation, and cycle notation
Definition
Let , so that (The natural numbers (von Neumann)). The symmetric group on letters is
the group of all bijections of under composition (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition), with the composition convention
so that in a product the right-hand factor acts first. An element of is named by either of the two notations below.
One-line notation. For , its one-line form is the list of its values in order of their arguments,
This list has length and its entries are , each occurring once, because is a bijection of . Conversely, a list whose entries are each occurring once is the one-line form of exactly one element of , namely the map sending each to : that map is injective because the entries are distinct, and surjective because every element of occurs among them. So one-line notation is a bijection from to the arrangements of in a list. For the one-line form of the unique element of is the empty list.
Cycle notation. For distinct with , the symbol denotes the element of that sends to for each , sends to , and fixes every element of outside (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition); it is called a -cycle, and a -cycle is a transposition. Writing cycle symbols side by side means composing them, so is , and the empty juxtaposition of cycle symbols is the identity .
Unlike one-line notation, cycle notation does not name each permutation once: the symbol may be started at any of its entries, so
and each -cycle is written by exactly symbols of this shape. A cycle symbol also does not record , which must be supplied by the context.
Remarks
-
The brackets carry the meaning, so the same list of numbers reads two different ways. Square brackets are one-line notation and round brackets are cycle notation. In the one-line form and the cycle symbol happen to name the same permutation, the one sending , , ; but is the identity while is not, and is the transposition exchanging and while is a -cycle. Inside a cycle symbol this library separates the entries by thin spaces rather than by commas, which keeps the two notations apart on the page.
-
Relation to the two-row form. Many texts write a permutation as the array , whose first row lists the arguments and whose second row lists their images. One-line notation is that array with its first row deleted, which loses nothing because the first row is the same for every .
-
Why the identity is a product of no cycles rather than a cycle. The cycle symbols are restricted to , so a fixed point is never written. The identity is therefore the empty product, and a permutation is written by listing only the cycles that move something. Which permutations admit such a factorisation, and in how many ways, is Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation; the fixed points that cycle notation suppresses are restored as one-cycles when a cycle type is recorded (Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type).
Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type
Definition
Let be a finite set and let , with cycle notation and composition as in The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition.
The support and fixed-point set of are
A cycle has length and support . Two cycles are disjoint when their supports are disjoint. A disjoint-cycle decomposition of is an expression for as a product of pairwise disjoint cycles of length at least . One-cycles are omitted, and the empty product is the identity permutation.
When , the cycle type of is the list of natural numbers , where is the number of -element orbits of the action generated by . Thus is the number of fixed points. Equivalently, the cycle type records the lengths of all cycles after each fixed point is inserted as a one-cycle.
Cycles with disjoint supports commute
Statement
Cycles with disjoint supports commute. More precisely, if is finite and and are cycles in and , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite set and two cycles with disjoint supports.
A cycle fixes every point outside its support, and two cycles are disjoint exactly when their supports are disjoint (Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type).
Proof
Every lies in , in , or in neither support, and the first two alternatives cannot both hold.
If , then fixes both and , so ; the symmetric argument applies on , while outside both supports both cycles fix . Thus the two composites agree at every point.
Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation
Statement
Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering the factors and cyclically rotating the entries within each cycle. The identity permutation has the empty disjoint-cycle decomposition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite set and a permutation ; the cyclic subgroup acts on by evaluation.
A disjoint-cycle decomposition is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles of length at least ; its omitted one-cycles are the fixed points (Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type).
For a left action, the distinct orbits partition the acted-on set (The orbits of a group action are the equivalence classes of iff for some , and hence partition the acted-on set).
The cyclic subgroup is exactly the set of integer powers (, and every cyclic group is abelian).
Cycles with disjoint supports commute (Cycles with disjoint supports commute).
Proof
The evaluation rule is an action by the Given, and [L3] identifies its orbit at as ; by [L2] these orbits partition .
Fix an orbit . Since is finite, the sequence first repeats; bijectivity of makes the first repeated value . If the least positive return time is , then and restricts to the cycle ; when , is fixed.
The cycles obtained from the non-singleton orbits have pairwise disjoint supports, and their product agrees with on each orbit and fixes every singleton orbit. Their product is therefore ; if every orbit is a singleton, this is the empty product.
In any disjoint-cycle decomposition of , [L4] allows powers to be taken factor by factor, while every factor except the unique one supporting a given point fixes that point. Thus successive powers of move the point exactly around that factor's support, so the support is the point's intrinsic -orbit. Hence the factor supports are forced, and the cycle on each support is forced up to its starting point, which is cyclic rotation; only the order of the disjoint factors remains free.
The order of a permutation is the least positive common multiple of its nontrivial cycle lengths, with value for the identity
Statement
Let the nontrivial cycles in the disjoint-cycle decomposition of a permutation have lengths . The order of is the least positive natural number divisible by every . For the identity, where , the order is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A permutation of a finite set and its order as the least positive exponent giving the identity.
Every finite permutation has a disjoint-cycle decomposition, unique up to reordering and cyclic rotation (Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation).
Cycles with disjoint supports commute (Cycles with disjoint supports commute).
The order of an element is the least positive natural exponent giving the identity (The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity).
Proof
Write as in [L1]. Since the factors commute by [L2], for every natural .
The -th power of a -cycle shifts its displayed entries by positions, so it is the identity exactly when , equivalently when divides . Because the supports are disjoint, is the identity exactly when every is the identity.
Thus the positive exponents giving the identity are precisely the positive common multiples of , so their least element is the order of by [L3]. If , then is the identity and its order is .
Every finite permutation is a product of transpositions, so the transpositions generate
Statement
Every permutation of a finite set is a product of transpositions. Consequently, for every natural , the transpositions in generate . The identity, including the only permutations in and , is represented by the empty product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite set and a permutation , with the right-hand factor in a product acting first.
Every finite permutation is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, with the identity represented by the empty product (Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation).
The subgroup generated by a subset is the smallest subgroup containing that subset (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups).
Proof
For , pointwise evaluation gives : the rightmost factor sends to , each to , and the leftmost factor sends back to , while all other points are fixed.
Replace each cycle in the decomposition supplied by [L1] with the factorisation in step 1.1 and concatenate the resulting finite lists. This expresses as a product of transpositions.
If is the identity, the decomposition and the resulting list are empty. Thus the conclusion includes and , and every element of lies in the smallest subgroup containing all transpositions, which by [L2] says that the transpositions generate .
Inversions, inversion number, the sign , and even and odd permutations
Definition
Let and . An inversion of is a pair with and . The inversion set and inversion number are
The sign of is the integer
The permutation is even when its sign is , equivalently when its inversion number is even, and odd when its sign is , equivalently when its inversion number is odd. For or , every inversion set is empty, so the unique permutation is even.
Composing with a transposition reverses
Statement
Let and let be a transposition. Then
Thus composing on either side with a transposition reverses inversion sign.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural , a permutation , and a transposition ; composition acts from right to left.
The inversion number counts pairs whose values occur in decreasing order, and inversion sign is raised to that number (Inversions, inversion number, the sign , and even and odd permutations).
Proof
If is an adjacent transposition, right composition by swaps the values of in positions and . Their mutual pair toggles its inversion status, while for every third position the two affected pairs merely exchange their total contribution. Hence the inversion number changes by an odd number and the inversion sign is negated.
For , the transposition equals , a product of adjacent transpositions.
Repeatedly applying step 1.1 along the odd-length product in step 2.1 gives the first formula. For the second, and is the transposition obtained by applying to the two moved points, so the first formula applied on the right gives the second.
Every transposition factorisation of has parity
Statement
If is any factorisation of a finite permutation into transpositions, then
Consequently any two transposition factorisations of the same permutation have the same parity, and every transposition factorisation of the identity has even length.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural and a factorisation in , where each is a transposition.
Every finite permutation has a transposition factorisation, and multiplying a permutation on either side by one transposition reverses its inversion sign (Every finite permutation is a product of transpositions, so the transpositions generate , Composing with a transposition reverses ).
Proof
The identity has no inversions, so the empty factorisation has inversion sign .
Starting with the identity and multiplying successively by the transpositions, [L1] reverses the inversion sign once at each multiplication; after multiplications the resulting sign is therefore .
The resulting permutation is , so . Applying this equality to any two factorisations proves equal parity, and applying it to the identity gives even length.
The sign is a homomorphism , surjective exactly when
Statement
For every natural , the function is a group homomorphism. It is surjective exactly when ; for and its image is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural and permutations .
Every finite permutation has a transposition factorisation, the sign is , and every such factorisation has that parity (Every finite permutation is a product of transpositions, so the transpositions generate , Inversions, inversion number, the sign , and even and odd permutations, Every transposition factorisation of has parity ).
Proof
Choose transposition factorisations and . Their concatenation is a transposition factorisation in the library's composition order.
By [L1], , and the identity has sign ; hence sign is a group homomorphism.
If , the transposition belongs to and has sign , while the identity has sign , so sign is surjective. If or , contains only the identity and the image is .
A -cycle has sign , and when fixed points are counted as cycles
Statement
A cycle of length has sign . If and is the number of cycles after every fixed point is included as a one-cycle, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural and a permutation .
Sign is a homomorphism, every finite permutation has a disjoint-cycle decomposition, and a -cycle is a product of transpositions (The sign is a homomorphism , surjective exactly when , Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation, Every finite permutation is a product of transpositions, so the transpositions generate ).
Proof
The standard factorisation of a -cycle has transpositions, so [L1] gives sign .
Write the disjoint-cycle decomposition of with lengths . Multiplicativity of sign and step 1.1 give .
Insert each fixed point as a one-cycle. Then the cycle lengths sum to , the number of cycles is , and , which gives the formula.
The alternating group of even permutations
Definition
For , the alternating group is the kernel of the sign homomorphism,
Thus consists exactly of the even permutations. The subgroup and normality assertions implicit in the word “group” follow from The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup and its kernel is a normal subgroup.
is normal in ; for , , while for
Statement
For every natural , is a normal subgroup of . If , then . If or , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural , the sign homomorphism on , and the alternating group .
is the kernel of sign (The alternating group of even permutations).
The kernel of every group homomorphism is a normal subgroup (The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup and its kernel is a normal subgroup).
The symmetric group of an -element set has elements (A finite set with has exactly bijections onto itself, and bijections onto any set of the same cardinality).
Sign is a homomorphism whose image is exactly when , and is for (The sign is a homomorphism , surjective exactly when ).
The cardinality of a disjoint union of two finite sets is the sum of their cardinalities (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition).
Proof
By [L1] and [L2], is a normal subgroup of .
Suppose . By [L4], choose with . Left multiplication is a bijection from the even fibre of sign to the odd fibre, with inverse left multiplication by , because [L4] gives .
The even and odd fibres are disjoint and have union , and step 2.1 gives them equal finite cardinality. Thus [L5] and [L3] give .
If or , [L4] says that sign has image , so its kernel is all of and .
For , sign is the unique nontrivial homomorphism
Statement
For , the sign homomorphism is the unique nontrivial group homomorphism .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural and a group homomorphism .
The transpositions generate , and sign is a homomorphism sending every transposition to (Every finite permutation is a product of transpositions, so the transpositions generate , The sign is a homomorphism , surjective exactly when ).
Proof
Any two transpositions are conjugate in : for their two-point supports, the identity handles equality, a transposition handles one common point, and the product of two disjoint transpositions handles disjoint supports, producing a permutation with .
Since is abelian, ; hence takes one common value on every transposition.
By [L1], if the common value is then is trivial. If it is , a product of transpositions has image , which is also its image under sign because sign sends every transposition to . Thus , and sign is the unique nontrivial homomorphism.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.
- Permutation (Wikipedia)
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §5.1
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, §4
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §5.1, Proposition 5.2
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §5.1, Theorem 5.3
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Proposition 4.26
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, §4, cycle decompositions
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §5.1, Proposition 5.4
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Corollary 4.27
- Stanford Math 51H, Permutations
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §5.1, Lemma 5.5 and Theorem 5.6
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, §4, the sign homomorphism
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §5.1, Theorem 5.7 and Proposition 5.8
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Remark 4.25