Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

10 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 10 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The symmetric group acts on its finite underlying set, and the orbit-partition theorem applies to the cyclic subgroup generated by a permutation. Finite cardinality and the count of bijections supply the size of SnS_n, while kernels of group homomorphisms supply normal subgroups. These results make cycle structure and parity available without introducing polynomial machinery.

The development first fixes SnS_n itself together with the one-line and cycle notations that name its elements, and the composition convention they are read under. Support and cycle type then lead to the unique disjoint-cycle decomposition, the order formula, and generation by transpositions. Inversion number then defines sign; the transposition lemma proves factorisation parity is well defined and makes sign a homomorphism. The cycle-sign formula identifies even permutations, after which the alternating group is defined as the sign kernel and its normality, cardinality, and homomorphism characterisation follow.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-08-11 (claude-opus-5)Open item page →

The finite symmetric group SnS_n, one-line notation, and cycle notation

Definition

Let nNn\in\mathbb N, so that n={0,1,,n1}n=\{0,1,\dots,n-1\} (The natural numbers N\mathbb{N} (von Neumann)). The symmetric group on nn letters is

Sn:=Sym(n)=Sym({0,1,,n1}),S_n:=\operatorname{Sym}(n)=\operatorname{Sym}(\{0,1,\dots,n-1\}),

the group of all bijections of nn under composition (The symmetric group Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X): the bijections of a set XX under composition), with the composition convention

(στ)(i):=(στ)(i)=σ(τ(i))(in),(\sigma\tau)(i):=(\sigma\circ\tau)(i)=\sigma(\tau(i))\qquad(i\in n),

so that in a product the right-hand factor acts first. An element of SnS_n is named by either of the two notations below.

One-line notation. For σSn\sigma\in S_n, its one-line form is the list of its values in order of their arguments,

σ=[σ(0),σ(1),,σ(n1)].\sigma=[\sigma(0),\sigma(1),\dots,\sigma(n-1)].

This list has length nn and its entries are 0,1,,n10,1,\dots,n-1, each occurring once, because σ\sigma is a bijection of nn. Conversely, a list [b0,b1,,bn1][b_0,b_1,\dots,b_{n-1}] whose entries are 0,1,,n10,1,\dots,n-1 each occurring once is the one-line form of exactly one element of SnS_n, namely the map sending each ini\in n to bib_i: that map is injective because the entries are distinct, and surjective because every element of nn occurs among them. So one-line notation is a bijection from SnS_n to the arrangements of 0,1,,n10,1,\dots,n-1 in a list. For n=0n=0 the one-line form of the unique element of S0S_0 is the empty list.

Cycle notation. For distinct a0,a1,,ak1na_0,a_1,\dots,a_{k-1}\in n with k2k\ge2, the symbol (a0a1ak1)(a_0\,a_1\,\cdots\,a_{k-1}) denotes the element of SnS_n that sends aia_i to ai+1a_{i+1} for each i<k1i<k-1, sends ak1a_{k-1} to a0a_0, and fixes every element of nn outside {a0,,ak1}\{a_0,\dots,a_{k-1}\} (The symmetric group Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X): the bijections of a set XX under composition); it is called a kk-cycle, and a 22-cycle is a transposition. Writing cycle symbols side by side means composing them, so (ab)(cd)(a\,b)(c\,d) is (ab)(cd)(a\,b)\circ(c\,d), and the empty juxtaposition of cycle symbols is the identity id\operatorname{id}.

Unlike one-line notation, cycle notation does not name each permutation once: the symbol may be started at any of its entries, so

(a0a1ak1)=(a1ak1a0)(a_0\,a_1\,\cdots\,a_{k-1})=(a_1\,\cdots\,a_{k-1}\,a_0)

and each kk-cycle is written by exactly kk symbols of this shape. A cycle symbol also does not record nn, which must be supplied by the context.

Remarks

  • The brackets carry the meaning, so the same list of numbers reads two different ways. Square brackets are one-line notation and round brackets are cycle notation. In S3S_3 the one-line form [1,2,0][1,2,0] and the cycle symbol (012)(0\,1\,2) happen to name the same permutation, the one sending 010\mapsto1, 121\mapsto2, 202\mapsto0; but [0,1,2][0,1,2] is the identity while (012)(0\,1\,2) is not, and [2,1,0][2,1,0] is the transposition exchanging 00 and 22 while (210)(2\,1\,0) is a 33-cycle. Inside a cycle symbol this library separates the entries by thin spaces rather than by commas, which keeps the two notations apart on the page.

  • Relation to the two-row form. Many texts write a permutation as the array σ=(01n1σ(0)σ(1)σ(n1))\sigma=\begin{pmatrix}0&1&\cdots&n-1\\\sigma(0)&\sigma(1)&\cdots&\sigma(n-1)\end{pmatrix}, whose first row lists the arguments and whose second row lists their images. One-line notation is that array with its first row deleted, which loses nothing because the first row is the same for every σSn\sigma\in S_n.

  • Why the identity is a product of no cycles rather than a cycle. The cycle symbols are restricted to k2k\ge2, so a fixed point is never written. The identity is therefore the empty product, and a permutation is written by listing only the cycles that move something. Which permutations admit such a factorisation, and in how many ways, is Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation; the fixed points that cycle notation suppresses are restored as one-cycles when a cycle type is recorded (Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type).

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type

Definition

Let XX be a finite set and let σSym(X)\sigma\in\operatorname{Sym}(X), with cycle notation and composition as in The symmetric group Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X): the bijections of a set XX under composition.

The support and fixed-point set of σ\sigma are

supp(σ):={xX:σ(x)x},Fix(σ):={xX:σ(x)=x}.\operatorname{supp}(\sigma):=\{x\in X:\sigma(x)\ne x\},\qquad \operatorname{Fix}(\sigma):=\{x\in X:\sigma(x)=x\}.

A cycle (a0a1ak1)(a_0\,a_1\,\ldots\,a_{k-1}) has length kk and support {a0,,ak1}\{a_0,\ldots,a_{k-1}\}. Two cycles are disjoint when their supports are disjoint. A disjoint-cycle decomposition of σ\sigma is an expression for σ\sigma as a product of pairwise disjoint cycles of length at least 22. One-cycles are omitted, and the empty product is the identity permutation.

When X=n|X|=n, the cycle type of σ\sigma is the list of natural numbers c1(σ),,cn(σ)c_1(\sigma),\ldots,c_n(\sigma), where ck(σ)c_k(\sigma) is the number of kk-element orbits of the action generated by σ\sigma. Thus c1(σ)c_1(\sigma) is the number of fixed points. Equivalently, the cycle type records the lengths of all cycles after each fixed point is inserted as a one-cycle.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Cycles with disjoint supports commute

Statement

Cycles with disjoint supports commute. More precisely, if XX is finite and α\alpha and β\beta are cycles in Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X) and supp(α)supp(β)=\operatorname{supp}(\alpha)\cap\operatorname{supp}(\beta)=\varnothing, then αβ=βα\alpha\beta=\beta\alpha.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite set XX and two cycles α,βSym(X)\alpha,\beta\in\operatorname{Sym}(X) with disjoint supports.

[L1]

A cycle fixes every point outside its support, and two cycles are disjoint exactly when their supports are disjoint (Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Every xXx\in X lies in supp(α)\operatorname{supp}(\alpha), in supp(β)\operatorname{supp}(\beta), or in neither support, and the first two alternatives cannot both hold.

givenL1
2.1

If xsupp(α)x\in\operatorname{supp}(\alpha), then β\beta fixes both xx and α(x)\alpha(x), so αβ(x)=βα(x)=α(x)\alpha\beta(x)=\beta\alpha(x)=\alpha(x); the symmetric argument applies on supp(β)\operatorname{supp}(\beta), while outside both supports both cycles fix xx. Thus the two composites agree at every point.

step 1.1L1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation

Statement

Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering the factors and cyclically rotating the entries within each cycle. The identity permutation has the empty disjoint-cycle decomposition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite set XX and a permutation σSym(X)\sigma\in\operatorname{Sym}(X); the cyclic subgroup σ\langle\sigma\rangle acts on XX by evaluation.

[L1]

A disjoint-cycle decomposition is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles of length at least 22; its omitted one-cycles are the fixed points (Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type).

[L3]

The cyclic subgroup σ\langle\sigma\rangle is exactly the set of integer powers {σr:rZ}\{\sigma^r:r\in\mathbb Z\} (g={gn:nZ}\langle g \rangle = \{\, g^{n} : n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}, and every cyclic group is abelian).

[L4]

Cycles with disjoint supports commute (Cycles with disjoint supports commute).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The evaluation rule is an action by the Given, and [L3] identifies its orbit at xx as {σr(x):rZ}\{\sigma^r(x):r\in\mathbb Z\}; by [L2] these orbits partition XX.

givenL2L3
2.1

Fix an orbit OO. Since OO is finite, the sequence x,σ(x),σ2(x),x,\sigma(x),\sigma^2(x),\ldots first repeats; bijectivity of σ\sigma makes the first repeated value xx. If the least positive return time is dd, then O={x,σ(x),,σd1(x)}O=\{x,\sigma(x),\ldots,\sigma^{d-1}(x)\} and σ\sigma restricts to the cycle (xσ(x)σd1(x))(x\,\sigma(x)\,\ldots\,\sigma^{d-1}(x)); when d=1d=1, xx is fixed.

step 1.1L1
3.1

The cycles obtained from the non-singleton orbits have pairwise disjoint supports, and their product agrees with σ\sigma on each orbit and fixes every singleton orbit. Their product is therefore σ\sigma; if every orbit is a singleton, this is the empty product.

step 2.1L1L2
4.1

In any disjoint-cycle decomposition of σ\sigma, [L4] allows powers to be taken factor by factor, while every factor except the unique one supporting a given point fixes that point. Thus successive powers of σ\sigma move the point exactly around that factor's support, so the support is the point's intrinsic σ\langle\sigma\rangle-orbit. Hence the factor supports are forced, and the cycle on each support is forced up to its starting point, which is cyclic rotation; only the order of the disjoint factors remains free.

step 3.1L1L2L3L4
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The order of a permutation is the least positive common multiple of its nontrivial cycle lengths, with value 11 for the identity

Statement

Let the nontrivial cycles in the disjoint-cycle decomposition of a permutation σ\sigma have lengths d1,,drd_1,\ldots,d_r. The order of σ\sigma is the least positive natural number divisible by every did_i. For the identity, where r=0r=0, the order is 11.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A permutation σ\sigma of a finite set and its order as the least positive exponent giving the identity.

[L1]

Every finite permutation has a disjoint-cycle decomposition, unique up to reordering and cyclic rotation (Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation).

[L2]

Cycles with disjoint supports commute (Cycles with disjoint supports commute).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write σ=γ1γr\sigma=\gamma_1\cdots\gamma_r as in [L1]. Since the factors commute by [L2], σk=γ1kγrk\sigma^k=\gamma_1^k\cdots\gamma_r^k for every natural kk.

givenL1L2
2.1

The kk-th power of a did_i-cycle shifts its displayed entries by kk positions, so it is the identity exactly when k0(moddi)k\equiv0\pmod{d_i}, equivalently when did_i divides kk. Because the supports are disjoint, σk\sigma^k is the identity exactly when every γik\gamma_i^k is the identity.

step 1.1L1L2
3.1

Thus the positive exponents giving the identity are precisely the positive common multiples of d1,,drd_1,\ldots,d_r, so their least element is the order of σ\sigma by [L3]. If r=0r=0, then σ\sigma is the identity and its order is 11.

step 2.1L1L3
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every finite permutation is a product of transpositions, so the transpositions generate SnS_n

Statement

Every permutation of a finite set is a product of transpositions. Consequently, for every natural nn, the transpositions in Sn=Sym(n)S_n=\operatorname{Sym}(n) generate SnS_n. The identity, including the only permutations in S0S_0 and S1S_1, is represented by the empty product.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite set XX and a permutation σSym(X)\sigma\in\operatorname{Sym}(X), with the right-hand factor in a product acting first.

[L1]

Every finite permutation is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, with the identity represented by the empty product (Every permutation of a finite set is a product of pairwise disjoint cycles, uniquely up to reordering and cyclic rotation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For k2k\ge2, pointwise evaluation gives (a0a1ak1)=(a0ak1)(a0a2)(a0a1)(a_0\,a_1\,\ldots\,a_{k-1})=(a_0\,a_{k-1})\cdots(a_0\,a_2)(a_0\,a_1): the rightmost factor sends a0a_0 to a1a_1, each aia_i to ai+1a_{i+1}, and the leftmost factor sends ak1a_{k-1} back to a0a_0, while all other points are fixed.

givenL1
2.1

Replace each cycle in the decomposition supplied by [L1] with the factorisation in step 1.1 and concatenate the resulting finite lists. This expresses σ\sigma as a product of transpositions.

step 1.1L1
3.1

If σ\sigma is the identity, the decomposition and the resulting list are empty. Thus the conclusion includes n=0n=0 and n=1n=1, and every element of SnS_n lies in the smallest subgroup containing all transpositions, which by [L2] says that the transpositions generate SnS_n.

step 2.1L1L2
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Inversions, inversion number, the sign sgn(σ)=(1)inv(σ)\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}, and even and odd permutations

Definition

Let nNn\in\mathbb N and σSn=Sym(n)\sigma\in S_n=\operatorname{Sym}(n). An inversion of σ\sigma is a pair (i,j)(i,j) with i<j<ni<j<n and σ(i)>σ(j)\sigma(i)>\sigma(j). The inversion set and inversion number are

Inv(σ):={(i,j)n×n:i<j and σ(i)>σ(j)},inv(σ):=Inv(σ).\operatorname{Inv}(\sigma):=\{(i,j)\in n\times n:i<j\text{ and }\sigma(i)>\sigma(j)\},\qquad \operatorname{inv}(\sigma):=|\operatorname{Inv}(\sigma)|.

The sign of σ\sigma is the integer

sgn(σ):=(1)inv(σ){+1,1}.\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma):=(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}\in\{+1,-1\}.

The permutation is even when its sign is +1+1, equivalently when its inversion number is even, and odd when its sign is 1-1, equivalently when its inversion number is odd. For n=0n=0 or n=1n=1, every inversion set is empty, so the unique permutation is even.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Composing with a transposition reverses (1)inv(σ)(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}

Statement

Let σSn\sigma\in S_n and let τ\tau be a transposition. Then

(1)inv(στ)=(1)inv(σ),(1)inv(τσ)=(1)inv(σ).(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma\tau)}=-(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)},\qquad (-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\tau\sigma)}=-(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}.

Thus composing on either side with a transposition reverses inversion sign.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural nn, a permutation σSn\sigma\in S_n, and a transposition τ\tau; composition acts from right to left.

[L1]

The inversion number counts pairs i<ji<j whose values occur in decreasing order, and inversion sign is (1)(-1) raised to that number (Inversions, inversion number, the sign sgn(σ)=(1)inv(σ)\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}, and even and odd permutations).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If sa=(aa+1)s_a=(a\,a+1) is an adjacent transposition, right composition by sas_a swaps the values of σ\sigma in positions aa and a+1a+1. Their mutual pair toggles its inversion status, while for every third position the two affected pairs merely exchange their total contribution. Hence the inversion number changes by an odd number and the inversion sign is negated.

givenL1
2.1

For a<ba<b, the transposition (ab)(a\,b) equals sasa+1sb2sb1sb2sa+1sas_a s_{a+1}\cdots s_{b-2}s_{b-1}s_{b-2}\cdots s_{a+1}s_a, a product of 2(ba)12(b-a)-1 adjacent transpositions.

step 1.1L1
3.1

Repeatedly applying step 1.1 along the odd-length product in step 2.1 gives the first formula. For the second, τσ=σ(σ1τσ)\tau\sigma=\sigma(\sigma^{-1}\tau\sigma) and σ1τσ\sigma^{-1}\tau\sigma is the transposition obtained by applying σ1\sigma^{-1} to the two moved points, so the first formula applied on the right gives the second.

step 2.1L1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every transposition factorisation of σ\sigma has parity (1)inv(σ)(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}

Statement

If σ=τ1τr\sigma=\tau_1\cdots\tau_r is any factorisation of a finite permutation into transpositions, then

(1)r=(1)inv(σ).(-1)^r=(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}.

Consequently any two transposition factorisations of the same permutation have the same parity, and every transposition factorisation of the identity has even length.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural nn and a factorisation σ=τ1τr\sigma=\tau_1\cdots\tau_r in SnS_n, where each τi\tau_i is a transposition.

[L1]

Every finite permutation has a transposition factorisation, and multiplying a permutation on either side by one transposition reverses its inversion sign (Every finite permutation is a product of transpositions, so the transpositions generate SnS_n, Composing with a transposition reverses (1)inv(σ)(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The identity has no inversions, so the empty factorisation has inversion sign 1=(1)01=(-1)^0.

givenL1
2.1

Starting with the identity and multiplying successively by the rr transpositions, [L1] reverses the inversion sign once at each multiplication; after rr multiplications the resulting sign is therefore (1)r(-1)^r.

step 1.1L1
3.1

The resulting permutation is σ\sigma, so (1)r=(1)inv(σ)(-1)^r=(-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}. Applying this equality to any two factorisations proves equal parity, and applying it to the identity gives even length.

step 2.1L1
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The sign is a homomorphism Sn{+1,1}S_n\to\{+1,-1\}, surjective exactly when n2n\ge 2

Statement

For every natural nn, the function sgn:Sn{+1,1}\operatorname{sgn}:S_n\to\{+1,-1\} is a group homomorphism. It is surjective exactly when n2n\ge2; for n=0n=0 and n=1n=1 its image is {1}\{1\}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural nn and permutations σ,ρSn\sigma,\rho\in S_n.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose transposition factorisations σ=τ1τr\sigma=\tau_1\cdots\tau_r and ρ=υ1υs\rho=\upsilon_1\cdots\upsilon_s. Their concatenation is a transposition factorisation σρ=τ1τrυ1υs\sigma\rho=\tau_1\cdots\tau_r\upsilon_1\cdots\upsilon_s in the library's composition order.

givenL1
2.1

By [L1], sgn(σρ)=(1)r+s=(1)r(1)s=sgn(σ)sgn(ρ)\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma\rho)=(-1)^{r+s}=(-1)^r(-1)^s=\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)\operatorname{sgn}(\rho), and the identity has sign 11; hence sign is a group homomorphism.

step 1.1L1
3.1

If n2n\ge2, the transposition (01)(0\,1) belongs to SnS_n and has sign 1-1, while the identity has sign 11, so sign is surjective. If n=0n=0 or n=1n=1, SnS_n contains only the identity and the image is {1}\{1\}.

step 2.1L1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A kk-cycle has sign (1)k1(-1)^{k-1}, and sgn(σ)=(1)nc(σ)\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=(-1)^{n-c(\sigma)} when fixed points are counted as cycles

Statement

A cycle of length kk has sign (1)k1(-1)^{k-1}. If σSn\sigma\in S_n and c(σ)c(\sigma) is the number of cycles after every fixed point is included as a one-cycle, then

sgn(σ)=(1)nc(σ).\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=(-1)^{n-c(\sigma)}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural nn and a permutation σSn\sigma\in S_n.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The standard factorisation of a kk-cycle has k1k-1 transpositions, so [L1] gives sign (1)k1(-1)^{k-1}.

givenL1
2.1

Write the disjoint-cycle decomposition of σ\sigma with lengths k1,,krk_1,\ldots,k_r. Multiplicativity of sign and step 1.1 give sgn(σ)=(1)i(ki1)\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=(-1)^{\sum_i(k_i-1)}.

step 1.1L1
3.1

Insert each fixed point as a one-cycle. Then the cycle lengths sum to nn, the number of cycles is c(σ)c(\sigma), and i(ki1)=nc(σ)\sum_i(k_i-1)=n-c(\sigma), which gives the formula.

step 2.1L1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The alternating group An=ker(sgn)A_n=\ker(\operatorname{sgn}) of even permutations

Definition

For nNn\in\mathbb N, the alternating group is the kernel of the sign homomorphism,

An:=ker(sgn:Sn{+1,1})={σSn:sgn(σ)=1}.A_n:=\ker(\operatorname{sgn}:S_n\to\{+1,-1\})=\{\sigma\in S_n:\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=1\}.

Thus AnA_n consists exactly of the even permutations. The subgroup and normality assertions implicit in the word “group” follow from The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup and its kernel is a normal subgroup.

CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

AnA_n is normal in SnS_n; for n2n\ge2, 2An=n!2\,|A_n|=n!, while An=SnA_n=S_n for n=0,1n=0,1

Statement

For every natural nn, AnA_n is a normal subgroup of SnS_n. If n2n\ge2, then 2An=n!2|A_n|=n!. If n=0n=0 or n=1n=1, then An=SnA_n=S_n.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] and [L2], AnA_n is a normal subgroup of SnS_n.

givenL1L2
2.1

Suppose n2n\ge2. By [L4], choose τSn\tau\in S_n with sgn(τ)=1\operatorname{sgn}(\tau)=-1. Left multiplication στσ\sigma\mapsto\tau\sigma is a bijection from the even fibre of sign to the odd fibre, with inverse left multiplication by τ1\tau^{-1}, because [L4] gives sgn(τσ)=sgn(σ)\operatorname{sgn}(\tau\sigma)=-\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma).

step 1.1L1L4
3.1

The even and odd fibres are disjoint and have union SnS_n, and step 2.1 gives them equal finite cardinality. Thus [L5] and [L3] give n!=Sn=An+An=2Ann!=|S_n|=|A_n|+|A_n|=2|A_n|.

step 2.1L1L3L5
4.1

If n=0n=0 or n=1n=1, [L4] says that sign has image {1}\{1\}, so its kernel is all of SnS_n and An=SnA_n=S_n.

step 3.1L1L4
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

For n2n\ge2, sign is the unique nontrivial homomorphism Sn{+1,1}S_n\to\{+1,-1\}

Statement

For n2n\ge2, the sign homomorphism is the unique nontrivial group homomorphism Sn{+1,1}S_n\to\{+1,-1\}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n2n\ge2 and a group homomorphism φ:Sn{+1,1}\varphi:S_n\to\{+1,-1\}.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Any two transpositions are conjugate in SnS_n: for their two-point supports, the identity handles equality, a transposition handles one common point, and the product of two disjoint transpositions handles disjoint supports, producing a permutation π\pi with π(ab)π1=(cd)\pi(a\,b)\pi^{-1}=(c\,d).

givenL1
2.1

Since {+1,1}\{+1,-1\} is abelian, φ(πτπ1)=φ(τ)\varphi(\pi\tau\pi^{-1})=\varphi(\tau); hence φ\varphi takes one common value on every transposition.

step 1.1L1
3.1

By [L1], if the common value is 11 then φ\varphi is trivial. If it is 1-1, a product of rr transpositions has image (1)r(-1)^r, which is also its image under sign because sign sends every transposition to 1-1. Thus φ=sgn\varphi=\operatorname{sgn}, and sign is the unique nontrivial homomorphism.

step 2.1L1

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources