Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

g={gn:nZ}\langle g \rangle = \{\, g^{n} : n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}, and every cyclic group is abelian

Statement

Let GG be a group and gGg \in G, with integer powers as in Powers gng^{n}: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=eg^{0} = e. Then

g  =  {gn  :  nZ},\langle g \rangle \;=\; \{\, g^{n} \;:\; n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\} ,

the cyclic subgroup generated by gg (The subgroup S\langle S \rangle generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup g\langle g \rangle, and cyclic groups) being exactly the set of integer powers of gg. Consequently every cyclic group is abelian, and so is every cyclic subgroup of any group.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group GG with identity ee, an element gGg \in G, and the set P:={gn:nZ}P := \{\, g^{n} : n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\} of its integer powers (Powers gng^{n}: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=eg^{0} = e).

[L1]

g\langle g \rangle is the smallest subgroup of GG containing gg: it is a subgroup, it contains gg, and it is contained in every subgroup containing gg (The subgroup S\langle S \rangle generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup g\langle g \rangle, and cyclic groups).

[L2]

Exponent laws: gm+n=gmgng^{m+n} = g^{m}g^{n}, gm=(gm)1g^{-m} = (g^{m})^{-1}, and gmgn=gngmg^{m}g^{n} = g^{n}g^{m}, for all m,nZm, n \in \mathbb{Z} (Exponent laws in a group: gm+n=gmgng^{m+n} = g^{m}g^{n} and (gm)n=gmn(g^{m})^{n} = g^{mn} for all m,nZm, n \in \mathbb{Z}, and (gh)n=gnhn(gh)^{n} = g^{n}h^{n} when gg and hh commute).

[L3]

g0=eg^{0} = e, g1=gg^{1} = g, and gσ(k)=gkgg^{\sigma(k)} = g^{k} g for kNk \in \mathbb{N}; a natural number kk in an exponent means the integer ι(k)\iota(k) (Powers gng^{n}: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=eg^{0} = e, The naturals embed in the integers).

[L4]

One-step test: a nonempty SGS \subseteq G with xy1Sx y^{-1} \in S for all x,ySx, y \in S is a subgroup (One-step subgroup test: a nonempty HGH \subseteq G is a subgroup iff gh1Hgh^{-1} \in H for all g,hHg, h \in H; the identity and the inverses of HH are then those of GG, Subgroup).

[L5]

Z\mathbb{Z} is a commutative ring, so m+(n)m + (-n) is again an integer and addition is commutative (The integers form a commutative ring, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals); its order is total, and every x0x \ge 0 is ι(k)\iota(k) for a unique natural kk while every x<0x < 0 has x=ι(k)-x = \iota(k) for a unique natural kk (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers, The naturals embed in the integers).

[L6]

Induction on N\mathbb{N} (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

PP is nonempty, since g0=ePg^{0} = e \in P, and PGP \subseteq G by construction.

L3given
1.2

For x=gmx = g^{m} and y=gny = g^{n} in PP: xy1=gm(gn)1=gmgn=gm+(n)Px y^{-1} = g^{m}(g^{n})^{-1} = g^{m} g^{-n} = g^{m+(-n)} \in P, since m+(n)m + (-n) is an integer.

L2L5
1.3

g=g1Pg = g^{1} \in P.

L3
1.4

Let HH be any subgroup of GG with gHg \in H. Then gkHg^{k} \in H for every natural kk: the set of such kk contains 00, because g0=eHg^{0} = e \in H, and it is closed under σ\sigma, because gσ(k)=gkgg^{\sigma(k)} = g^{k} g is a product of two elements of HH; induction finishes it.

L3L4L6given
2.1

By steps 1.1 and 1.2 and the one-step test, PP is a subgroup of GG, and by step 1.3 it contains gg; hence gP\langle g \rangle \subseteq P, since g\langle g \rangle is contained in every subgroup containing gg.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L1L4
2.2

Let HH be any subgroup of GG with gHg \in H, and let xZx \in \mathbb{Z}. If x0x \ge 0 then x=ι(k)x = \iota(k) and gx=gkHg^{x} = g^{k} \in H by step 1.4. If x<0x < 0 then x=ι(k)-x = \iota(k), so gx=(gk)1g^{x} = (g^{k})^{-1}, which lies in HH because gkHg^{k} \in H by step 1.4 and HH is closed under inverses. So PHP \subseteq H.

step 1.4L3L4L5
3.1

Taking H=gH = \langle g \rangle in step 2.2, which is legitimate because g\langle g \rangle is a subgroup containing gg, gives PgP \subseteq \langle g \rangle; with step 2.1 this proves g=P\langle g \rangle = P.

step 2.1step 2.2L1
4.1

Any two elements of PP commute: gmgn=gngmg^{m} g^{n} = g^{n} g^{m} for all integers m,nm, n. Hence g\langle g \rangle is abelian, by step 3.1.

step 3.1L2
5.1

If GG is cyclic, say G=gG = \langle g \rangle, then GG is abelian by step 4.1; and every cyclic subgroup of any group is abelian for the same reason.

step 3.1step 4.1L1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 58 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources