How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
Definition
On the set of pairs of natural numbers, define
This is an equivalence relation (The integer-defining relation is an equivalence relation). The integers are the quotient
and we write for the equivalence class of .
Remarks
- The pair encodes the formal difference ; the defining relation is the equation "" restated using only addition, which is all has.
- and its arithmetic (commutativity, associativity, distributivity, cancellation of addition, the order) are taken as given background throughout this construction.
Depends on
Used by
- A rational root of xᵏ = m is an integer: if k ≥ 1, m ∈ ℤ, x ∈ ℚ and xᵏ is the image of m, then x is the image of an integer Corollary
- Compact and discrete transforms are the two extreme Plancherel cases Corollary
- Division with remainder for any nonzero divisor: for a ∈ ℤ and b ≠ 0 there are unique q, r ∈ ℤ with a = qb + r and 0 ≤ r < |b| Corollary
- Every nonzero integer n is u ∏_i<r pᵢ with u ∈ {1,-1} and every pᵢ prime; u and r are determined by n, and the list is determined up to a permutation Corollary
- For an integer p > 1: p is prime if and only if, for all integers a and b, p ∣ ab implies p ∣ a or p ∣ b Corollary
- If a prime p divides a finite product ∏_i<n aᵢ of integers then p ∣ aᵢ for some i < n; at n = 0 the product is 1 and the hypothesis cannot hold Corollary
- The extended Euclidean algorithm: the same descent produces integers x, y with ax + by = gcd(a,b), so Bézout coefficients are computed and not merely shown to exist Corollary
- The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it Corollary
- The principal logarithm is the normalised holomorphic branch on the slit plane Corollary
- The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by 2π Corollary
- Two-dimensional simple symmetric walk is recurrent Corollary
- 2ℤ is closed under addition, negation and multiplication and is not a subring of ℤ, because it does not contain 1 Counterexample
- 6 ∣ 4 · 9 while 6 ∤ 4 and 6 ∤ 9: dividing a product does not force dividing a factor, and the coprimality hypothesis is what fails Counterexample
- A continuous function on [0,1] can have unbounded variation Counterexample
- A naive signed count without the quotient orientation can fail to square to zero Counterexample
- A nonempty subset of a group closed under the operation need not be a subgroup: the nonnegative integers inside (ℤ, +) Counterexample
- Forgetting the compact-open topology destroys Pontryagin duality Counterexample
- If 1 were admitted as a prime, uniqueness would fail: 6 = 2 · 3 = 1 · 2 · 3 = 1 · 1 · 2 · 3, lists of different lengths that no permutation matches Counterexample
- In the multiplicative monoid H = {1, 4, 7, 10, …} of positive integers one more than a multiple of 3, the element 100 has two genuinely different factorisations into irreducibles, 4 · 25 and 10 · 10 Counterexample
- The collapsing recursion has no solution on (ℤ,<) Counterexample
- The common divisors of (0,0) are all of ℤ and have no greatest element in the order of ℤ, so gcd(0,0) cannot be defined as a maximum and is fixed by convention Counterexample
- The integers do not have property (T) Counterexample
- The lexicographic order on ℤ×ℤ is not a well-order Counterexample
- The map n ↦ (n,0) from ℤ to ℤ × ℤ preserves addition and multiplication and does not preserve 1, so the clause f(1) = 1 is not redundant Counterexample
- The shift x↦ x+1 is a nonidentity order automorphism of (ℤ,<) Counterexample
- ℤ and {n + 1/n : n ≥ 2} are disjoint closed subsets of ℝ at distance 0, so the set-to-set distance is not a metric Counterexample
- ℤ is closed and not compact, and (0,1) is bounded and not compact: neither hypothesis of Heine-Borel can be dropped Counterexample
- ψ(1/x) has no limit at 0: two sequences tending to 0 give values constantly 0 and constantly 1/2 Counterexample
- Arithmetic on the integers Definition
- Complex chains, their traces, and cycles Definition
- Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function Definition
- Diagonal lattice paths with steps U=(1,1) and D=(1,-1), and the height function Definition
- Divisibility in ℤ: d ∣ a when a = dq for some integer q Definition
- Dyadic cubes of all generations in ℝⁿ Definition
- Dyadic cubes of generation k in ℝⁿ Definition
- Finite-channel reaction propensity systems and their generator Definition
- Fredholm operator cokernel and index Definition
- Integer powers aᵐ Definition
- Integer powers in the complex field Definition
- Lagged lattice covariance and variogram estimators Definition
…and 123 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Landau, Foundations of Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Integer — construction from pairs of naturals (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)