How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Arithmetic on the integers
Definition
On (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals) define, on representatives,
These do not depend on the chosen representatives (Integer addition and negation are well defined ↗, Integer multiplication is well defined ↗).
Remarks
- The product formula is forced by the intended meaning: if stands for and for , then .
- Negation swaps the components: .
Depends on
Used by
- A rational root of xᵏ = m is an integer: if k ≥ 1, m ∈ ℤ, x ∈ ℚ and xᵏ is the image of m, then x is the image of an integer Corollary
- Division with remainder for any nonzero divisor: for a ∈ ℤ and b ≠ 0 there are unique q, r ∈ ℤ with a = qb + r and 0 ≤ r < |b| Corollary
- Every nonzero integer n is u ∏_i<r pᵢ with u ∈ {1,-1} and every pᵢ prime; u and r are determined by n, and the list is determined up to a permutation Corollary
- For an integer p > 1: p is prime if and only if, for all integers a and b, p ∣ ab implies p ∣ a or p ∣ b Corollary
- If a prime p divides a finite product ∏_i<n aᵢ of integers then p ∣ aᵢ for some i < n; at n = 0 the product is 1 and the hypothesis cannot hold Corollary
- If d = gcd(a,b) is nonzero then a/d and b/d are coprime Corollary
- The extended Euclidean algorithm: the same descent produces integers x, y with ax + by = gcd(a,b), so Bézout coefficients are computed and not merely shown to exist Corollary
- 2ℤ is closed under addition, negation and multiplication and is not a subring of ℤ, because it does not contain 1 Counterexample
- 6 ∣ 4 · 9 while 6 ∤ 4 and 6 ∤ 9: dividing a product does not force dividing a factor, and the coprimality hypothesis is what fails Counterexample
- A nonempty subset of a group closed under the operation need not be a subgroup: the nonnegative integers inside (ℤ, +) Counterexample
- If 1 were admitted as a prime, uniqueness would fail: 6 = 2 · 3 = 1 · 2 · 3 = 1 · 1 · 2 · 3, lists of different lengths that no permutation matches Counterexample
- In the multiplicative monoid H = {1, 4, 7, 10, …} of positive integers one more than a multiple of 3, the element 100 has two genuinely different factorisations into irreducibles, 4 · 25 and 10 · 10 Counterexample
- The common divisors of (0,0) are all of ℤ and have no greatest element in the order of ℤ, so gcd(0,0) cannot be defined as a maximum and is fixed by convention Counterexample
- The map n ↦ (n,0) from ℤ to ℤ × ℤ preserves addition and multiplication and does not preserve 1, so the clause f(1) = 1 is not redundant Counterexample
- Common multiple, and the least common multiple lcm(a,b), taken to be 0 when a = 0 or b = 0 Definition
- Divisibility in ℤ: d ∣ a when a = dq for some integer q Definition
- Integer powers aᵐ Definition
- Powers gⁿ: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g⁰ = e Definition
- Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p > 1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p Definition
- The absolute value |a| of an integer Definition
- The formal Laurent series ℝ((t⁻¹)): support bounded below, valuation, leading coefficient Definition
- The p-adic valuation vₚ(a) of a nonzero integer: the greatest k ∈ ℕ with pᵏ ∣ a Definition
- (ℤ, +) is an abelian group, (ℤ, ·) is a commutative monoid that is not a group, and its group of units is {1, -1} Example
- 12ℤ + 18ℤ = 6ℤ and 12ℤ ∩ 18ℤ = 36ℤ, the arithmetic of gcd and lcm read off the subgroups of (ℤ,+) Example
- 2 is prime, and it is the only even prime: every even integer n > 2 is composite Example
- 360 = 2³ · 3² · 5 and 84 = 2² · 3 · 7, with gcd(360,84) = 12 and lcm(360,84) = 2520 read off the exponents Example
- A product of two rings with 1 ≠ 0 always has zero divisors: (1,0)(0,1) = (0,0) in ℤ × ℤ, so a product of integral domains is never an integral domain Example
- ax + by = c has an integer solution exactly when gcd(a,b) ∣ c: 6x + 15y = 9 is solvable and 6x + 15y = 7 is not Example
- Bézout coefficients are not unique: 1071 · (-3) + 462 · 7 = 21 and 1071 · 19 + 462 · (-44) = 21, and for nonzero a, b every solution has the form (x₀ + t b/d, y₀ - t a/d) Example
- Consecutive Fibonacci numbers are coprime, and for every m ∈ ℕ the Euclidean algorithm on (Fₘ₊₃, Fₘ₊₂) takes exactly m+1 divisions, with quotient 1 in the first m of them and quotient 2 in the last Example
- For every n ∈ ℕ there are n consecutive composite integers: with N := ∏_j<n(j+2), each of N+2, …, N+n+1 is composite Example
- For n ≥ 1 the congruence classes modulo n form an abelian group (ℤ/n, +) of order n, generated by the class of 1 Example
- gcd at the boundary: gcd(a,0) = |a|, gcd(0,0) = 0, and the convention gcd(0,0) = 0 is exactly what makes gcd(ca,cb) = |c|gcd(a,b) true at c = 0 Example
- gcd(1071, 462) = 21 by the Euclidean algorithm, with the back-substitution giving 21 = 7 · 462 - 3 · 1071 Example
- No rational squares to 3 or to 6, and none cubes to 2: three instances of the rational-root corollary Example
- nℤ is a subgroup of (ℤ, +) for every n ∈ ℤ, and every subgroup of (ℤ, +) has this form Example
- ℤ is a commutative ring and an ordered ring, the published construction being an instance of the general definitions Example
- ℤ is an integral domain of characteristic 0 whose group of units is {1,-1}, so it is not a field: 2 is nonzero and not invertible Example
- ℤ sits inside ℚ as a subring that is not a subfield, so the inverse-closure clause of the subfield definition is doing work Example
- FALSE: every Fermat number 2^2ⁿ + 1 is prime False statement
…and 44 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 14 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Integer — construction from pairs of naturals (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)