Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If d=gcd⁡(a,b) is nonzero then a/d and b/d are coprime

Statement

Let a,b∈Z and put d:=gcd⁡(a,b) (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd⁡(a,b), with the convention gcd⁡(0,0):=0), and suppose d≠0, equivalently (a,b)≠(0,0). Since d∣a and d∣b, there are unique integers, written a/d and b/d, with

a  =  d⋅(a/d),b  =  d⋅(b/d),

uniqueness holding because d≠0 and Z has cancellation (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation). Then

gcd⁡(a/d,  b/d)  =  1,

that is, a/d and b/d are coprime (Coprime integers: gcd⁡(a,b)=1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers a,b with (a,b)≠(0,0), and d:=gcd⁡(a,b).

[L1]

gcd⁡(u,v)≥1 when (u,v)≠(0,0), gcd⁡(0,0)=0, and gcd⁡(u,v) is a common divisor of u and v (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd⁡(a,b), with the convention gcd⁡(0,0):=0).

[L3]

If xz=yz and z≠0 then x=y (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).

[L4]
[L6]

Z is a commutative ring with x⋅1=x (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers); its order is total, antisymmetric and transitive (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).

[L7]

u and v are coprime exactly when gcd⁡(u,v)=1 (Coprime integers: gcd⁡(a,b)=1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since (a,b)≠(0,0) we have d≥1, so d≠0 and d≥0, whence ∣d∣=d.

L1L5L6
2.1

d is a common divisor of a and b, so there are integers a′ and b′ with a=da′ and b=db′; each is unique, since da′=da′′ with d≠0 gives a′=a′′ by cancellation. Write a′=a/d and b′=b/d.

step 1.1L1L3L4L6
3.1

By [L2] applied with c=d, u=a′ and v=b′: d=gcd⁡(a,b)=gcd⁡(da′,db′)=∣d∣gcd⁡(a′,b′)=d gcd⁡(a′,b′).

step 1.1step 2.1L2
4.1

Also d=d⋅1, so d⋅gcd⁡(a′,b′)=d⋅1 with d≠0, and cancellation gives gcd⁡(a′,b′)=1: the integers a/d and b/d are coprime.

step 1.1step 3.1L3L6L7∎

Remarks

  • The hypothesis d≠0 is not a restriction in disguise. It fails only at (a,b)=(0,0), where a/d and b/d are not defined at all, since division by 0 determines nothing.

  • This is the standard "reduce a fraction to lowest terms" statement, proved without any fractions: a/d is defined as the unique integer solving a=d⋅x, and lives in Z throughout.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources