Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If d=gcd(a,b)d = \gcd(a,b) is nonzero then a/da/d and b/db/d are coprime

Statement

Let a,bZa, b \in \mathbb{Z} and put d:=gcd(a,b)d := \gcd(a,b) (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd(a,b)\gcd(a,b), with the convention gcd(0,0):=0\gcd(0,0) := 0), and suppose d0d \ne 0, equivalently (a,b)(0,0)(a,b) \ne (0,0). Since dad \mid a and dbd \mid b, there are unique integers, written a/da/d and b/db/d, with

a  =  d(a/d),b  =  d(b/d),a \;=\; d \cdot (a/d), \qquad b \;=\; d \cdot (b/d) ,

uniqueness holding because d0d \ne 0 and Z\mathbb{Z} has cancellation (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation). Then

gcd(a/d,  b/d)  =  1,\gcd(a/d,\; b/d) \;=\; 1 ,

that is, a/da/d and b/db/d are coprime (Coprime integers: gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers a,ba, b with (a,b)(0,0)(a,b) \ne (0,0), and d:=gcd(a,b)d := \gcd(a,b).

[L1]

gcd(u,v)1\gcd(u,v) \ge 1 when (u,v)(0,0)(u,v) \ne (0,0), gcd(0,0)=0\gcd(0,0) = 0, and gcd(u,v)\gcd(u,v) is a common divisor of uu and vv (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd(a,b)\gcd(a,b), with the convention gcd(0,0):=0\gcd(0,0) := 0).

[L3]

If xz=yzxz = yz and z0z \ne 0 then x=yx = y (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).

[L4]
[L6]

Z\mathbb{Z} is a commutative ring with x1=xx \cdot 1 = x (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers); its order is total, antisymmetric and transitive (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).

[L7]

uu and vv are coprime exactly when gcd(u,v)=1\gcd(u,v) = 1 (Coprime integers: gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since (a,b)(0,0)(a,b) \ne (0,0) we have d1d \ge 1, so d0d \ne 0 and d0d \ge 0, whence d=d|d| = d.

L1L5L6
2.1

dd is a common divisor of aa and bb, so there are integers aa' and bb' with a=daa = d a' and b=dbb = d b'; each is unique, since da=dad a' = d a'' with d0d \ne 0 gives a=aa' = a'' by cancellation. Write a=a/da' = a/d and b=b/db' = b/d.

step 1.1L1L3L4L6
3.1

By [L2] applied with c=dc = d, u=au = a' and v=bv = b': d=gcd(a,b)=gcd(da,db)=dgcd(a,b)=dgcd(a,b)d = \gcd(a,b) = \gcd(d a', d b') = |d| \gcd(a',b') = d\,\gcd(a',b').

step 1.1step 2.1L2
4.1

Also d=d1d = d \cdot 1, so dgcd(a,b)=d1d \cdot \gcd(a',b') = d \cdot 1 with d0d \ne 0, and cancellation gives gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a',b') = 1: the integers a/da/d and b/db/d are coprime.

step 1.1step 3.1L3L6L7

Remarks

  • The hypothesis d0d \ne 0 is not a restriction in disguise. It fails only at (a,b)=(0,0)(a,b) = (0,0), where a/da/d and b/db/d are not defined at all, since division by 00 determines nothing.

  • This is the standard "reduce a fraction to lowest terms" statement, proved without any fractions: a/da/d is defined as the unique integer solving a=dxa = d \cdot x, and lives in Z\mathbb{Z} throughout.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 56 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources