How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If is nonzero then and are coprime
Statement
Let and put (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ), and suppose , equivalently . Since and , there are unique integers, written and , with
uniqueness holding because and has cancellation (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation). Then
that is, and are coprime (Coprime integers: ).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers with , and .
when , , and is a common divisor of and (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ).
means for some (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
is a commutative ring with (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers); its order is total, antisymmetric and transitive (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).
and are coprime exactly when (Coprime integers: ).
Proof
Since we have , so and , whence .
is a common divisor of and , so there are integers and with and ; each is unique, since with gives by cancellation. Write and .
By [L2] applied with , and : .
Also , so with , and cancellation gives : the integers and are coprime.
Remarks
-
The hypothesis is not a restriction in disguise. It fails only at , where and are not defined at all, since division by determines nothing.
-
This is the standard "reduce a fraction to lowest terms" statement, proved without any fractions: is defined as the unique integer solving , and lives in throughout.
Depends on
- $\gcd(ca, cb) = |c|\,\gcd(a,b)$ for all integers $a, b, c$, the identity holding at $c = 0$ and at $(a,b) = (0,0)$ as well
- Coprime integers: $\gcd(a,b) = 1$
- Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor $\gcd(a,b)$, with the convention $\gcd(0,0) := 0$
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- The absolute value $|a|$ of an integer
- Absolute value in $\mathbb{Z}$: $|a| \ge 0$; $|a| = 0$ exactly when $a = 0$; $|-a| = |a|$; $|ab| = |a|\,|b|$; $-|a| \le a \le |a|$; and $|a| \le c$ exactly when $-c \le a \le c$
- The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation
- The integers form a commutative ring
- Arithmetic on the integers
- The integers form a totally ordered ring
- Order on the integers
Used by
- A rational root of xᵏ = m is an integer: if k ≥ 1, m ∈ ℤ, x ∈ ℚ and xᵏ is the image of m, then x is the image of an integer Corollary
- The Dirichlet function 1_ℚ, and Thomae's function t with t(x) = 1/q at a rational x = p/q in lowest terms with q ≥ 1 and t(x) = 0 at every irrational x Definition
- Bézout coefficients are not unique: 1071 · (-3) + 462 · 7 = 21 and 1071 · 19 + 462 · (-44) = 21, and for nonzero a, b every solution has the form (x₀ + t b/d, y₀ - t a/d) Example
- For coprime positive m,n, every pair of residue classes modulo m and n has a unique simultaneous class modulo mn Lemma
- If n≥1, d=gcd(a,n) and d∣ b, then ax≡ bpmod n reduces to a congruence with coprime coefficient modulo n/d Lemma
- Every common multiple of a and b is a multiple of lcm(a,b), and gcd(a,b) · lcm(a,b) = |ab| Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 56 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Greatest common divisor (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)