Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-02 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bézout coefficients are not unique: 1071(3)+4627=211071 \cdot (-3) + 462 \cdot 7 = 21 and 107119+462(44)=211071 \cdot 19 + 462 \cdot (-44) = 21, and for nonzero a,ba, b every solution has the form (x0+tb/d,  y0ta/d)(x_0 + t b/d,\; y_0 - t a/d)

Example

Bézout's identity: for integers a,ba, b not both zero, gcd(a,b)\gcd(a,b) is the least positive element of {ax+by:x,yZ}\{\, ax + by : x, y \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}; in particular ax+by=gcd(a,b)ax + by = \gcd(a,b) has an integer solution asserts that ax+by=gcd(a,b)ax + by = \gcd(a,b) has a solution; it does not assert that the solution is unique, and it is not. For a=1071a = 1071 and b=462b = 462, where gcd(a,b)=21\gcd(a,b) = 21 (gcd(1071,462)=21\gcd(1071, 462) = 21 by the Euclidean algorithm, with the back-substitution giving 21=74623107121 = 7 \cdot 462 - 3 \cdot 1071),

1071(3)+4627  =  21and107119+462(44)  =  21.1071 \cdot (-3) + 462 \cdot 7 \;=\; 21 \qquad \text{and} \qquad 1071 \cdot 19 + 462 \cdot (-44) \;=\; 21 .

The general statement, for aa and bb both nonzero, is this. Put d=gcd(a,b)d = \gcd(a,b), a=a/da' = a/d and b=b/db' = b/d (If d=gcd(a,b)d = \gcd(a,b) is nonzero then a/da/d and b/db/d are coprime), and let (x0,y0)(x_0, y_0) be any solution of ax+by=dax + by = d. Then the solutions of that equation are exactly the pairs

(x,y)  =  (x0+tb,  y0ta)  =  (x0+tb/d,  y0ta/d),tZ.(x,\,y) \;=\; (x_0 + t\,b',\; y_0 - t\,a') \;=\; \bigl(x_0 + t\,b/d,\; y_0 - t\,a/d\bigr), \qquad t \in \mathbb{Z} .

For the pair above, d=21d = 21, a=51a' = 51 and b=22b' = 22, and t=1t = 1 carries (3,7)(-3, 7) to (19,44)(19, -44).

Numerals. For kNk \in \mathbb{N} the symbol kk written inside Z\mathbb{Z} means ι(k)\iota(k), the embedding of The naturals embed in the integers; every numerical identity below is the image of the corresponding identity in N\mathbb{N}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Nonzero integers aa and bb, d:=gcd(a,b)d := \gcd(a,b), and a solution (x0,y0)(x_0,y_0) of ax+by=dax + by = d; and, for the numerical part, a=1071a = 1071, b=462b = 462, d=21d = 21.

[L1]

Z\mathbb{Z} is a commutative ring: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, x1=xx \cdot 1 = x, x0=0x \cdot 0 = 0, multiplication distributes over addition, and every xx has an additive inverse; we write uvu - v for u+(v)u + (-v) (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).

[L3]

If d=gcd(a,b)0d = \gcd(a,b) \ne 0 then a=daa = d a' and b=dbb = d b' for unique integers a=a/da' = a/d and b=b/db' = b/d, and gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a',b') = 1 (If d=gcd(a,b)d = \gcd(a,b) is nonzero then a/da/d and b/db/d are coprime, Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd(a,b)\gcd(a,b), with the convention gcd(0,0):=0\gcd(0,0) := 0, Coprime integers: gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1).

[L6]
[L7]

If xz=yzxz = yz and z0z \ne 0 then x=yx = y; and a product of nonzero integers is nonzero (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Since a0a \ne 0 and b0b \ne 0 we have (a,b)(0,0)(a,b) \ne (0,0), so d1d \ge 1 and in particular d0d \ne 0; fix a,ba', b' with a=daa = d a', b=dbb = d b' and gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a',b') = 1. Both aa' and bb' are nonzero, since da=a0d a' = a \ne 0 and db=b0d b' = b \ne 0.

givenL1L3
2.1

Every pair of the stated form is a solution: for tZt \in \mathbb{Z}, a(x0+tb)+b(y0ta)=(ax0+by0)+t(abba)=d+t((da)b(db)a)=d+t0=da(x_0 + t b') + b(y_0 - t a') = (a x_0 + b y_0) + t(a b' - b a') = d + t\bigl((d a')b' - (d b')a'\bigr) = d + t \cdot 0 = d.

step 1.1givenL1
2.2

Conversely, let (x,y)(x,y) satisfy ax+by=dax + by = d. Subtracting ax0+by0=da x_0 + b y_0 = d gives a(xx0)=b(yy0)a(x - x_0) = -\,b(y - y_0), that is da(xx0)=db(yy0)d a'(x - x_0) = -\,d b'(y - y_0); cancelling d0d \ne 0 gives a(xx0)=b(yy0)a'(x - x_0) = -\,b'(y - y_0).

step 1.1givenL1L7
2.3

The numerical instance. Here d=21d = 21 by [L8], and 2151=107121 \cdot 51 = 1071, 2122=46221 \cdot 22 = 462, so a=51a' = 51 and b=22b' = 22. The pair (3,7)(-3,7) is a solution, since 1071(3)+4627=3213+3234=211071 \cdot (-3) + 462 \cdot 7 = -3213 + 3234 = 21.

step 1.1L1L8algebra
3.1

Hence ba(xx0)b' \mid a'(x - x_0), and gcd(b,a)=gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(b',a') = \gcd(a',b') = 1, so bxx0b' \mid x - x_0 by [L5]: write xx0=tbx - x_0 = t b' for some tZt \in \mathbb{Z}.

step 2.2L4L5L6
4.1

Substituting into step 2.2, atb=b(yy0)a' t b' = -\,b'(y - y_0); cancelling b0b' \ne 0 gives at=(yy0)a' t = -(y - y_0), that is y=y0tay = y_0 - t a'. So (x,y)=(x0+tb,y0ta)(x,y) = (x_0 + t b',\, y_0 - t a').

step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1L1L7
5.1

With step 2.1 this shows the solutions are exactly the pairs (x0+tb,y0ta)(x_0 + t b', y_0 - t a'), tZt \in \mathbb{Z}.

step 2.1step 4.1
6.1

Taking t=1t = 1 in step 5.1 gives (3+22,  751)=(19,44)(-3 + 22,\; 7 - 51) = (19, -44), and directly 107119+462(44)=2034920328=211071 \cdot 19 + 462 \cdot (-44) = 20349 - 20328 = 21. So the same equation has at least the two solutions (3,7)(-3,7) and (19,44)(19,-44), and they are distinct because 319-3 \ne 19.

step 5.1step 2.3L1algebra

Remarks

  • The family is infinite. Distinct values of tt give distinct pairs, since b0b' \ne 0 and x0+tb=x0+tbx_0 + t b' = x_0 + t' b' forces t=tt = t' by cancellation. So a Bézout equation with a,ba, b both nonzero never has a unique solution.

  • Why the statement is restricted to a,ba, b both nonzero. With b=0b = 0 and a0a \ne 0 the quotient b/db/d is 00 and the family collapses to (x0,y0ta/d)(x_0,\, y_0 - t a/d), which is still the complete solution set but for a different reason: xx is then forced and yy is free. The uniform statement above is the one used elsewhere, and the degenerate case is recorded here so that its absence from the claim is deliberate rather than an oversight.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 66 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources