Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1 and abca \mid bc then aca \mid c; and if aca \mid c, bcb \mid c and gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1 then abcab \mid c

Statement

Let a,b,cZa, b, c \in \mathbb{Z}.

  1. If gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1 and abca \mid bc, then aca \mid c.
  2. If aca \mid c, bcb \mid c and gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1, then abcab \mid c.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers a,b,ca, b, c.

[L3]

Divisibility is reflexive and transitive; if dud \mid u and dvd \mid v then dux+vyd \mid ux + vy for all x,yx, y; and dud \mid u implies duwd \mid uw (Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on Z\mathbb{Z}, and is linear: if dad \mid a and dbd \mid b then dax+byd \mid ax + by for all integers x,yx, y; also dad \mid a implies dacd \mid ac, da-d \mid a and dad \mid -a).

[L4]

dud \mid u means u=dqu = dq for some qZq \in \mathbb{Z} (Divisibility in Z\mathbb{Z}: dad \mid a when a=dqa = dq for some integer qq).

[L5]

Z\mathbb{Z} is a commutative ring: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, x1=xx \cdot 1 = x, and multiplication distributes over addition (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Claim 1. Assume gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1 and abca \mid bc, and fix x,yx, y with ax+by=1ax + by = 1.

L1choose
1.2

Claim 2. Assume aca \mid c, bcb \mid c and gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1. Write c=asc = as with sZs \in \mathbb{Z}.

L4choose
2.1

Multiplying ax+by=1ax + by = 1 by cc gives a(xc)+(bc)y=ca(xc) + (bc)y = c, using associativity, commutativity and distributivity.

step 1.1L5
3.1

Now aaa \mid a, hence aa(xc)a \mid a(xc) by [L3]; and abca \mid bc, hence a(bc)ya \mid (bc)y by [L3]. Applying linearity to these two with coefficients 11 and 11 gives aa(xc)+(bc)y=ca \mid a(xc) + (bc)y = c.

step 1.1step 2.1L3L5
4.1

Then bc=asb \mid c = as, and gcd(b,a)=gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(b,a) = \gcd(a,b) = 1 by [L2], so claim 1 applied with bb, aa, ss in place of aa, bb, cc gives bsb \mid s.

step 3.1step 1.2L2
5.1

Write s=bts = bt; then c=as=a(bt)=(ab)tc = as = a(bt) = (ab)t, so abcab \mid c.

step 1.2step 4.1L4L5

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 52 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources