Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classification of groups of order pq for primes p<q

Statement

Let p<q be primes.

  • If p∤(q−1), every group of order pq is cyclic.
  • If p∣(q−1), there are exactly two isomorphism classes of groups of order pq: the cyclic group Cpq and one nonabelian semidirect product Cq⋊Cp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Primes p<q and a group G of order pq.

[L3]

A normal factor and a complement with trivial intersection realise an external semidirect product ( Recognition theorem: G=NH with N⊴G, N∩H=1 exactly realises an external semidirect product).

[L4]

Nontrivial actions of Cp on Cq exist exactly when p∣(q−1) and give a unique semidirect-product type ( For primes p<q, nontrivial actions of Cp on Cq exist exactly when p∣(q−1) and are unique up to automorphisms).

[L8]

Finite cyclic groups are determined up to isomorphism by their order (Every cyclic group is isomorphic to (Z,+) or to (Z/n,+) for its finite order n≥1).

Proof

technique · cases
1.1L1L2L5L7algebra

Choose Q and P as in [L1] and [L2]. By [L7], the order of Q∩P divides both primes, so the intersection is trivial. Since Q is normal, QP is a subgroup by [L5]. Its cosets xP for x∈Q are distinct because xP=x′P would give x′−1x∈Q∩P, and each has p elements. Thus ∣QP∣=pq=∣G∣, so G=QP.

2.1step 1.1L2L3

Both Q and P are cyclic by [L2], and [L3] gives G≅Cq⋊Cp.

3.1step 2.1L5L6

[assume-case first] Suppose the action is trivial. Let x,y generate the commuting factors of orders q,p. If (xy)m=1, then xm=y−m belongs to their trivial intersection, so q∣m and p∣m by [L5]. Since p,q are coprime, [L6] gives pq∣m. Hence xy has order pq, and G is cyclic.

3.2step 2.1L4

[assume-case second] Suppose the action is nontrivial. Then [L4] says that this is possible exactly when p∣(q−1) and that all such products are isomorphic. The product is nonabelian because some element of P acts nontrivially on Q.

4.1step 3.1step 3.2L4L8∎

[cases-exhaustive] If p∤(q−1) only step 3.1 occurs. If p∣(q−1), steps 3.1 and 3.2 give two types, distinguished by commutativity; [L8] gives uniqueness of the cyclic type and [L4] gives uniqueness of the nonabelian type.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources