How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cauchy's theorem: if a prime divides , then has an element of order
Statement
Let be a finite group and let be prime. If , then contains an element of order .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and a prime dividing .
A finite -group acting on a finite set satisfies the fixed-point congruence (If a finite -group acts on a finite set , then ).
The additive group is a group with elements and hence is a finite -group (For every natural , is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold, The congruence class and the quotient set , For , every class in has one representative with , so ; while is in bijection with , A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
If and are finite, the set of functions has cardinality (The set of functions between finite sets is finite, with , Exponentiation of natural numbers, , and its agreement with the integer power in ).
A prime is greater than and has only and itself as positive divisors (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
A congruence means that divides , and divisibility means existence of an integer factor (Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and , Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
The order of an element is the least positive exponent giving the identity (The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity, If then iff is an integer multiple of , the powers are distinct, and has exactly elements; if has infinite order then only for ).
Proof
Let be the set of -tuples whose ordered product is . The first coordinates determine the last uniquely as , so [L3] gives ; since and , one has .
Let act on by cyclic rotation. If , then , so rotation preserves ; rotations are the identity, and [L2] therefore gives an action of the finite -group .
A tuple is fixed by every rotation exactly when it is constant, say , and it lies in exactly when .
By [L1], . Step 1.1 makes the left side divisible by , so the number of fixed tuples is divisible by . The constant identity tuple is fixed, and a positive multiple of cannot equal , so there is another fixed tuple.
By step 3.1, this second tuple is for some with . By [L6], the positive order of divides the prime and is not , so it is .
Depends on
- If a finite $p$-group $P$ acts on a finite set $X$, then $|X|\equiv|X^P|\pmod p$
- A finite $p$-group has order $p^n$ for a prime $p$ and some $n\in\mathbb N$
- For every natural $n$, $(\mathbb{Z}/n,+)$ is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold
- The congruence class $[a]_n$ and the quotient set $\mathbb{Z}/n$
- For $n\ge 1$, every class in $\mathbb{Z}/n$ has one representative $r$ with $0\le r<n$, so $\lvert\mathbb{Z}/n\rvert=n$; while $\mathbb{Z}/0$ is in bijection with $\mathbb{Z}$
- The set $A^{B}$ of functions $B \to A$ between finite sets is finite, with $\lvert A^{B}\rvert = \lvert A\rvert^{\lvert B\rvert}$
- Exponentiation of natural numbers, $m^{n}$, and its agreement with the integer power in $\mathbb{R}$
- Prime and composite integers: $p$ is prime when $p > 1$ and its only positive divisors are $1$ and $p$
- Congruence modulo an integer: $a\equiv b\pmod n$ when $n\mid(a-b)$, including the moduli $0$ and $1$
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- The order $|G|$ of a finite group and the order $\operatorname{ord}(g)$ of an element, with $\operatorname{ord}(g) = \infty$ when no positive power of $g$ is the identity
- If $\operatorname{ord}(g) = n$ then $g^{k} = e$ iff $k$ is an integer multiple of $n$, the powers $g^{0}, \dots, g^{n-1}$ are distinct, and $\langle g \rangle$ has exactly $n$ elements; if $g$ has infinite order then $g^{j} = g^{k}$ only for $j = k$
Used by
- The kernel of the automorphism action on P/Φ(P) is a p-group Corollary
- The subgroup ⟨(1 2 3),(1 2)(3 4)⟩≤ S₄ has order 12 but no subgroup of order 6, so Cauchy's theorem does not extend to composite divisors Counterexample
- For primes p<q, nontrivial actions of Cₚ on C_q exist exactly when p∣(q-1) and are unique up to automorphisms Lemma
- If p<q are primes and |G|=pq, then G has a normal subgroup of order q Lemma
- Finite 2-transitive groups have affine or almost simple socle type Proposition
- A finite group is solvable if and only if all its composition factors are cyclic of prime order Theorem
- Classification of groups of order pq for primes p<q Theorem
- Every group of order 30 has normal Sylow 3- and 5-subgroups and is not simple Theorem
- For a finite group and a field of characteristic p, the group algebra is local exactly when the group is a p-group Theorem
- For prime p, a transitive subgroup of Sₚ containing a transposition is all of Sₚ Theorem
- Hall–Burnside: coprime automorphisms are detected on the Frattini quotient Theorem
- Maximal subgroups of finite nilpotent groups are normal of prime index Theorem
- Schur-Zassenhaus conjugacy when the kernel or quotient is solvable Theorem
- Schur-Zassenhaus existence theorem Theorem
- Sylow and maximal-subgroup characterizations of finite nilpotence Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, 14.2 (standard reference, not scraped)